Bond 23 - Skyfall

Author
Discussion

Regiment

2,799 posts

161 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
Saw it for the first time lastnight, few plot holes that really stood out that spoilt it a bit for me.

P-Jay

10,645 posts

193 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
Caught it last night, really enjoyed it - bit of a departure from the usual Bond fayre, not so triumphant. Bond's on the back-foot all the way. Enjoyed seeing more back-story.

One aspect I didn't like so much, he's gone from New Boy to "I'm too old for this st" in 3 films. Possibly because of my own fear of ageing.

Product placement wasn't as bad as I'd feared from some reviews.

Q, new M, Moneypenny, don't think this version of JB needs them, but it seemed to work well.

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
Ignoring all the plot holes, and suspending one's sense of disbelief for a bit, i quite enjoyed Skyfall. The Quality of the cinematography was i think high, nice lighting and framing, and even the bit pat players seems to be decent actors. Considering the trailers suggested a complete action-fest, there were long periods of dialogue and no action, which i enjoyed actually.

My two criticisms revolve around the love interest with Severine not really being played out, i think there was room to expand on that jepardy situation a bit more, and Silva not really getting much screen time of being allowed to build a proper sense of malice with Bonds character.

Some scenes were particularily well done though, the sequence in the skyscraper, with the external advertising hording lights being reflected in the glass partitions was really quite excellent for example.

A solid 7/10 for me, not bad, but perhaps the script wasn't as strong as you might have hoped given the quality of the cast.

Ari

19,363 posts

217 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
Sad old men wishing they were James Bond overrating a film which isn't even that decent compared to films in its own genre let alone the entire film word. Absurd to call it 'brilliant' and wouldn't be done by anyone who had actually seen a brilliant film.
Lovely to see some intelligent insightful comment! biggrin

31mph

1,308 posts

137 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
Regiment said:
Saw it for the first time lastnight, few plot holes that really stood out that spoilt it a bit for me.
Such as?

Mojooo

12,833 posts

182 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
JonRB said:
Mojooo said:
Oh yea?

Well its not as good as Titanic (fact).
In your opinion.

Titanic is actually a bit crap, as anyone who has actually seen a brilliant film would know. evil
As Joey Tribbiani once said "You're dead inside".

Mind you my point was that box office revenues are not the best indicator. I bet loads of James Bond wannabes went to see it multiple times!


JonRB

75,191 posts

274 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
Mind you my point was that box office revenues are not the best indicator. I bet loads of James Bond wannabes went to see it multiple times!
And I bet it gives you a hard-on knowing how superior you are to them. wink

Not really understanding why you give a st either way, to be quite honest.

Mojooo

12,833 posts

182 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
Its not something that keeps me up at night but it does irk me to see an average film praised as though its something special. Its not IMO.


TheHeretic

73,668 posts

257 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
Its not something that keeps me up at night but it does irk me to see an average film praised as though its something special. Its not IMO.
People and their differing opinions. It is annoying isn't it! If only everyone thought the same, we could all agree then.

Edited by TheHeretic on Sunday 24th February 22:29

Mojooo

12,833 posts

182 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
TheHeretic said:
People and there differing opinions. It is annoying isn't it! If only everyone thought the same, we could all agree then.
I haven't got a problem with the fanboys - they just need to know they are wrong!

TheHeretic

73,668 posts

257 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
Damn you, quoting my grammatical error!

JonRB

75,191 posts

274 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
I haven't got a problem with the fanboys - they just need to know they are wrong!
I still don't understand why you even *care*.

Anyway, no matter. I'm off to bed now.

wheedler

419 posts

139 months

Sunday 24th February 2013
quotequote all
I cannot believe I actually got dragged out to the cinema to see this film, a waste of two hours

goldblum

10,272 posts

169 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
wheedler said:
I cannot believe I actually got dragged out to the cinema to see this film, a waste of two hours
I was astonished how poor Skyfall was, especially given all the hype.

Went with my better half to the cinema last night for the first time since the Skyfall disappointment. Die Hard 4/5/6 or whatever. It's a sad day when time is better spent with John McClane than James Bond.



Ari

19,363 posts

217 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
Its not something that keeps me up at night but it does irk me to see an average film praised as though its something special. Its not IMO.
The answer is in your TLA. (Look it up).

im

34,302 posts

219 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
goldblum said:
Die Hard 4/5/6 or whatever. It's a sad day when time is better spent with John McClane than James Bond.
Thankfully that day hasn't arrived yet.

goldblum

10,272 posts

169 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
im said:
goldblum said:
Die Hard 4/5/6 or whatever. It's a sad day when time is better spent with John McClane than James Bond.
Thankfully that day hasn't arrived yet.
Hasn't it? How foolish of me I'll change my opinion to match yours then.

vixen1700

23,307 posts

272 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Watched it yesterday and quite enjoyed it, not a classic Bond but a decent enough dreary, cold Sunday afternoon flick. smile

MX7

7,902 posts

176 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
Watched it yesterday and thought it was quite good, but I thought that the way that Silva let himself be caught as if he was Russell Crowe in 3:10 to Yuma was a bit too much.

After watching it though, in my mind Craig is the 2nd best Bond.

JonnyFive

29,413 posts

191 months

Monday 25th February 2013
quotequote all
MX7 said:
in my mind Craig is the 2nd best Bond.
1st best is?