24 Hours in Police Custody: Ch4
Discussion
Gameface said:
It's a start??? What the f
k do you think I owe you???
I don't have to tell you st.
You want links, more information, you're talking to the wrong bloke.
The repercussions of that firearms case are still ongoing.
The judge was highly critical in his summation. He admonished the force involved for leaving him no choice but to administer such a trivial sentence.
The st flowed from the judge downwards. People's law enforcement careers were affected and as a result they made it a priority to try and take down those involved by other means, to save face.
So why the fk would I say more than I have?
I only told you as courtesy and courtesy only goes so far...
Thank you.k do you think I owe you??? I don't have to tell you s
t.You want links, more information, you're talking to the wrong bloke.
The repercussions of that firearms case are still ongoing.
The judge was highly critical in his summation. He admonished the force involved for leaving him no choice but to administer such a trivial sentence.
The s
t flowed from the judge downwards. People's law enforcement careers were affected and as a result they made it a priority to try and take down those involved by other means, to save face.So why the f
k would I say more than I have?I only told you as courtesy and courtesy only goes so far...
I do hope I haven't upset you. I would hate that.
I meant that perhaps you could post a link to a news report of the case. Nobody would be able to identify you - would they?
Trax said:
Gameface said:
Police and especially the CPS are their own worst enemies sometimes.
They could've made the right charges stick but got greedy and royally fked it up. 6 months work for fk all.
I've been a beneficiary of such poor judgement by Essex police and the CPS. This is not an unusual occurrence.
Surprised they let their incompetence be broadcast.
It was a bit strange. When they questioned him further after his statement, they were saying he had made it up just reacting to the information they had released to him. Seemingly forgetting that the homeless guys statement backed what he was saying.....They could've made the right charges stick but got greedy and royally f
ked it up. 6 months work for fk all.I've been a beneficiary of such poor judgement by Essex police and the CPS. This is not an unusual occurrence.
Surprised they let their incompetence be broadcast.
It was fair to say that he had in fact only said things in his statement that they had told him and that would suit it.
Mojooo said:
Trax said:
Gameface said:
Police and especially the CPS are their own worst enemies sometimes.
They could've made the right charges stick but got greedy and royally fked it up. 6 months work for fk all.
I've been a beneficiary of such poor judgement by Essex police and the CPS. This is not an unusual occurrence.
Surprised they let their incompetence be broadcast.
It was a bit strange. When they questioned him further after his statement, they were saying he had made it up just reacting to the information they had released to him. Seemingly forgetting that the homeless guys statement backed what he was saying.....They could've made the right charges stick but got greedy and royally f
ked it up. 6 months work for fk all.I've been a beneficiary of such poor judgement by Essex police and the CPS. This is not an unusual occurrence.
Surprised they let their incompetence be broadcast.
It was fair to say that he had in fact only said things in his statement that they had told him and that would suit it.
Solve the crime, don't try and stitch someone up so you can add another feather to your cap.
Legacywr said:
I don't have much respect for the police at all.
I don't have any respect for the criminals either. Nearly every case these days is solved by gathering mobile phone usage and location information. I mean ffs if you are going out to commit a crime you don't take your mobile phone with you and you don't text or call anyone involved either before or after the event. Makes the Police look good!BrabusMog said:
Yet the police always show themselves in these shows to be after a "result". These lot were the worst I've seen and, to be fair, it was actually embarrassing.
Solve the crime, don't try and stitch someone up so you can add another feather to your cap.
I think when you are dealing with bad people all day every day it becomes easy to get into that sort of mindsetSolve the crime, don't try and stitch someone up so you can add another feather to your cap.
To me part of the blame lies with the CPS - someone should have examined the evidence in the cold light of day and made a judgement on whether he had a defence/good reason to do what he did
Munter said:
The Mad Monk said:
Thesprucegoose said:
my experience of the police is they do lie to get convictions. I pled guilty but they still lied to bolster their case. It would clearly be habitual as it was pointless challenging them and they knew what to get away with.
pled.Is that a word?
I quite enjoyed Murder 24/7 last night, was initially surprised that the County Lines lad got not guilty, but then again the two homeless blokes did try to violently rob him down a dark alley, so a jury could be inclined to go with the self defence angle as they did here
That Essex DCI came across as a bit of a plum. He was all, "me, me, me, my suspect, my murderer" like a cross between David Brent and someone who has watched far too many 70's cop shows. The reality was that it was a huge team operation.
That Essex DCI came across as a bit of a plum. He was all, "me, me, me, my suspect, my murderer" like a cross between David Brent and someone who has watched far too many 70's cop shows. The reality was that it was a huge team operation.
Mojooo said:
I think when you are dealing with bad people all day every day it becomes easy to get into that sort of mindset
To me part of the blame lies with the CPS - someone should have examined the evidence in the cold light of day and made a judgement on whether he had a defence/good reason to do what he did
I'd say most of the blame lies with the CPS. They make a decision to prosecute, and on what grounds, based on whether they feel the evidence is enough to secure a conviction. But Essex came across very badly in this one, and I for one was actually rooting for a not guilty decision. Based on the evidence presented in the programme a guilty decision seemed wholly unjust.To me part of the blame lies with the CPS - someone should have examined the evidence in the cold light of day and made a judgement on whether he had a defence/good reason to do what he did
PurpleTurtle said:
I quite enjoyed Murder 24/7 last night, was initially surprised that the County Lines lad got not guilty, but then again the two homeless blokes did try to violently rob him down a dark alley, so a jury could be inclined to go with the self defence angle as they did here
That Essex DCI came across as a bit of a plum. He was all, "me, me, me, my suspect, my murderer" like a cross between David Brent and someone who has watched far too many 70's cop shows. The reality was that it was a huge team operation.
it was 4 hobos.That Essex DCI came across as a bit of a plum. He was all, "me, me, me, my suspect, my murderer" like a cross between David Brent and someone who has watched far too many 70's cop shows. The reality was that it was a huge team operation.
They way he was looking over at him in the booking in area, pure Brent.
Thesprucegoose said:
PurpleTurtle said:
I quite enjoyed Murder 24/7 last night, was initially surprised that the County Lines lad got not guilty, but then again the two homeless blokes did try to violently rob him down a dark alley, so a jury could be inclined to go with the self defence angle as they did here
That Essex DCI came across as a bit of a plum. He was all, "me, me, me, my suspect, my murderer" like a cross between David Brent and someone who has watched far too many 70's cop shows. The reality was that it was a huge team operation.
it was 4 hobos.That Essex DCI came across as a bit of a plum. He was all, "me, me, me, my suspect, my murderer" like a cross between David Brent and someone who has watched far too many 70's cop shows. The reality was that it was a huge team operation.
They way he was looking over at him in the booking in area, pure Brent.
PurpleTurtle said:
I quite enjoyed Murder 24/7 last night, was initially surprised that the County Lines lad got not guilty, but then again the two homeless blokes did try to violently rob him down a dark alley, so a jury could be inclined to go with the self defence angle as they did here
That Essex DCI came across as a bit of a plum. He was all, "me, me, me, my suspect, my murderer" like a cross between David Brent and someone who has watched far too many 70's cop shows. The reality was that it was a huge team operation.
He knew full well the murder charge was never going to stick, otherwise he would have been at court for the verdict ready to lap up the media attention.That Essex DCI came across as a bit of a plum. He was all, "me, me, me, my suspect, my murderer" like a cross between David Brent and someone who has watched far too many 70's cop shows. The reality was that it was a huge team operation.
BadBull said:
Greendubber said:
Some DCIs are a bit like that but fortunately most of them are normal people doing a difficult job very well.
As a copper what's your take on them pursuing the murder charge?Greendubber said:
BadBull said:
Greendubber said:
Some DCIs are a bit like that but fortunately most of them are normal people doing a difficult job very well.
As a copper what's your take on them pursuing the murder charge?Gameface said:
It's a start??? What the fk do you think I owe you???
I don't have to tell you st.
You want links, more information, you're talking to the wrong bloke.
The repercussions of that firearms case are still ongoing.
The judge was highly critical in his summation. He admonished the force involved for leaving him no choice but to administer such a trivial sentence.
The st flowed from the judge downwards. People's law enforcement careers were affected and as a result they made it a priority to try and take down those involved by other means, to save face.
So why the fk would I say more than I have?
I only told you as courtesy and courtesy only goes so far...
Blimey, slight anger issue there k do you think I owe you??? I don't have to tell you s
t.You want links, more information, you're talking to the wrong bloke.
The repercussions of that firearms case are still ongoing.
The judge was highly critical in his summation. He admonished the force involved for leaving him no choice but to administer such a trivial sentence.
The s
t flowed from the judge downwards. People's law enforcement careers were affected and as a result they made it a priority to try and take down those involved by other means, to save face.So why the f
k would I say more than I have?I only told you as courtesy and courtesy only goes so far...
Drclarke said:
Gameface said:
It's a start??? What the fk do you think I owe you???
I don't have to tell you st.
You want links, more information, you're talking to the wrong bloke.
The repercussions of that firearms case are still ongoing.
The judge was highly critical in his summation. He admonished the force involved for leaving him no choice but to administer such a trivial sentence.
The st flowed from the judge downwards. People's law enforcement careers were affected and as a result they made it a priority to try and take down those involved by other means, to save face.
So why the fk would I say more than I have?
I only told you as courtesy and courtesy only goes so far...
Blimey, slight anger issue there k do you think I owe you??? I don't have to tell you s
t.You want links, more information, you're talking to the wrong bloke.
The repercussions of that firearms case are still ongoing.
The judge was highly critical in his summation. He admonished the force involved for leaving him no choice but to administer such a trivial sentence.
The s
t flowed from the judge downwards. People's law enforcement careers were affected and as a result they made it a priority to try and take down those involved by other means, to save face.So why the f
k would I say more than I have?I only told you as courtesy and courtesy only goes so far...
BadBull said:
Gameface said:
gave that little scrote some massive street rep.
That kid will now be a legend among his little gang for getting off a murder charge.And because those he answers to have seen he can keep his mouth shut he will have moved up the ladder so to speak.
Great result.
Surprised it went to Court, TBH.
He admitted self defence and the guy on the street admitted they planned to rob him, and tried to do so, so why did the CPS waste the money for less than a 50/50 chance of conviction? That said, the young lad was a proper scumbag, no emotion shown or f
ks given when he was arrested or charged, and he will rise the ranks of the gang he's part of.Karma will get him.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff