Dambusters film

Author
Discussion

PF62

3,777 posts

175 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
The film has a national cinema release on the 17th May 2018, the 75th anniversary of the operation.

The promotion material says - "Experience the film like never before with a brand new 4K restoration, complete with a live satellite broadcast straight from the Royal Albert Hall. TV historian Dan Snow will host the commemorative screening, paying tribute to Wing Commander Guy Gibson and his comrades of the legendary 617 squadron, with music from the world-famous Glenn Miller Orchestra. Special guests will also include family members of the Dam Busters crew and former members of the squadron, as well as historian Paul Beaver and Professor Hugh Hunt, who will explore the history of the iconic raid and how it led to the making of the classic British film."

kowalski655

14,733 posts

145 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
Yeah,all very good, but what will they call the DOG? smile

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
awful, he had no nose!


erm

Vipers

32,959 posts

230 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
kowalski655 said:
Yeah,all very good, but what will they call the DOG? smile
With the PC brigade its propably a white persian cat now.

williamp

19,326 posts

275 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
Here we go again. One mord time: who cares. The Dog didnt design the bomb and it didnt fly any of the aircraft. I think the only reason the dog is included as it portrays gibson as a singular man...just him and his dog against the world etc.

What was the name of his Wife?? We never see her because she didnt do any of the above either. But the same people who say "its not racist......" etc are the same who dont know, or dont care he had a wife. Or even knew....

GadgeS3C

4,516 posts

166 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
Don't think his wife was run over and killed though.

But agree, not the biggest deal ever.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

263 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
williamp said:
Here we go again. One mord time: who cares. The Dog didnt design the bomb and it didnt fly any of the aircraft. I think the only reason the dog is included as it portrays gibson as a singular man...just him and his dog against the world etc.

What was the name of his Wife?? We never see her because she didnt do any of the above either. But the same people who say "its not racist......" etc are the same who dont know, or dont care he had a wife. Or even knew....
From what I read, Gibson specifically asked for the dog to be buried at the same time he was scheduled to attack the dam, possibly implying he expected to be in a hole in the ground at the same time. Also the dog's name was the codeword for a successful bomb run, so it was obviously important to Gibson.

Obviously a remake could be done without mentioning the dog at all, probably a wise move. But it would lose something.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

286 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
4k? Going to have to get that.

Wonder how the new film is going.

AMG Merc

11,954 posts

255 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
Vipers said:
kowalski655 said:
Yeah,all very good, but what will they call the DOG? smile
With the PC brigade its propably a white persian cat now.
They'd better call him by his real name - no one has the right to alter history just to suit whatever is current PC shoot

Eric Mc

122,335 posts

267 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
I wish he'd never bought a bloody dog. It messes up ANY discussion on the actual mission.

Evangelion

7,795 posts

180 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
I don't see why they couldn't just miss out the dog entirely, or at least any reference to his name. Then you'd just see a guy on a telephone receiving the codeword without the viewer even needing to know what it was.

Vipers

32,959 posts

230 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
AMG Merc said:
Vipers said:
kowalski655 said:
Yeah,all very good, but what will they call the DOG? smile
With the PC brigade its propably a white persian cat now.
They'd better call him by his real name - no one has the right to alter history just to suit whatever is current PC shoot
Totally agree, history is history. I always remember the dogs name, but have never used that name in any other context, and don't associate it with other than that dog.

Another 30 pages at least me thinks.

bad company

18,864 posts

268 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
Evangelion said:
I don't see why they couldn't just miss out the dog entirely, or at least any reference to his name. Then you'd just see a guy on a telephone receiving the codeword without the viewer even needing to know what it was.
The dog is an important part of the story.

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
Evangelion said:
I don't see why they couldn't just miss out the dog entirely, or at least any reference to his name. Then you'd just see a guy on a telephone receiving the codeword without the viewer even needing to know what it was.
Exactly, it's inconsequential.
After checking wiki, it seems, "Guy sometimes used to call his dog Nigsy, so I think that's what we will call it. Stephen has been coming up with other names, but this is the one I want."

Eric Mc

122,335 posts

267 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
The problem is that they used the actual dog's name as a code word for when a damn went over - so it gets used in more places than just when Gibson is calling after his dog. It's an integral part of the actual events and needs to be included.

What annoys me is that it seems to be the only thing about the whole amazing mission that anybody ever seems to want to talk about.

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The problem is that they used the actual dog's name as a code word for when a damn went over - so it gets used in more places than just when Gibson is calling after his dog. It's an integral part of the actual events and needs to be included.

What annoys me is that it seems to be the only thing about the whole amazing mission that anybody ever seems to want to talk about.
Yes, but the actual word isn't necessary to detonate the bombs, it didn't require that particular arrangement of letters for the bombs to explode, using the dog's name for the codeword is a part of history, though even that bit isn't really intrinsic to the story, it's not a documentary.
I've not watched Dunkirk, or read the thread, but sorts in there were getting bent out of shape over train seats? Or something.
When you think about what gets left out of war films, Battle of the Bulge for example, leaving out the fact that the name of a dog was the codeword isn't that large.


edit for speeeling

Edited by Halb on Saturday 3rd March 22:15

Ayahuasca

27,428 posts

281 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
Never mind the dog, will any new film use the original Dam Busters' March in its soundtrack?

A bouncing bomb without the 'daaaaa daaaaa dada dada da da' is inconceivable.




stichill99

1,055 posts

183 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
If it is alright for Quentin Tarantino to use the N word quite often in his movies it's surely quite acceptable to use it in the Dambusters.......it's surely ok to use it for historical purposes.

Vipers

32,959 posts

230 months

Saturday 3rd March 2018
quotequote all
All said and done, looking forward to seeing the film.

SCEtoAUX

4,119 posts

83 months

Sunday 4th March 2018
quotequote all
stichill99 said:
If it is alright for Quentin Tarantino to use the N word quite often in his movies it's surely quite acceptable to use it in the Dambusters.......it's surely ok to use it for historical purposes.
Naggers?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu8giYLHU9g