24 Hours in Police Custody: Ch4
Discussion
johnboy1975 said:
Legacywr said:
Did you all see The Met this week?
That was very good.
Saw the first one...rest bookmarked. That was very good.
Still don't understand why the mum got 23 years for giving them a lift. I'd have thought "accessory to" would be the charge, and be (substantially) less than the four boys...?
andymc said:
johnboy1975 said:
Legacywr said:
Did you all see The Met this week?
That was very good.
Saw the first one...rest bookmarked. That was very good.
Still don't understand why the mum got 23 years for giving them a lift. I'd have thought "accessory to" would be the charge, and be (substantially) less than the four boys...?
johnboy1975 said:
Legacywr said:
Did you all see The Met this week?
That was very good.
Saw the first one...rest bookmarked. That was very good.
Still don't understand why the mum got 23 years for giving them a lift. I'd have thought "accessory to" would be the charge, and be (substantially) less than the four boys...?
k her. Good programme. Second one is a mystery... half way through it.
Programme guide says this is series 3 - I'll search iplayer for the others!
number2 said:
johnboy1975 said:
Legacywr said:
Did you all see The Met this week?
That was very good.
Saw the first one...rest bookmarked. That was very good.
Still don't understand why the mum got 23 years for giving them a lift. I'd have thought "accessory to" would be the charge, and be (substantially) less than the four boys...?
k her. Good programme. Second one is a mystery... half way through it.
Programme guide says this is series 3 - I'll search iplayer for the others!
"Mum, can you give me and three mates a lift to hack a kid to death with machetes?"
"Righto son. We won't worry about my car and registration being picked up by CCTV or your mate's tag. Let's go".
Didn't exactly need Sherlock Holmes to solve that one. But I cannot comprehend what they were thinking. If they did any thinking at all that is.
I imagine the son got a lighter sentence because he had a better lawyer.
jtremlett said:
wonder how that conversation went?
"Mum, can you give me and three mates a lift to hack a kid to death with machetes?"
"Righto son. We won't worry about my car and registration being picked up by CCTV or your mate's tag. Let's go".
Didn't exactly need Sherlock Holmes to solve that one. But I cannot comprehend what they were thinking. If they did any thinking at all that is.
I imagine the son got a lighter sentence because he had a better lawyer.
Have we had an explanation as to what the, er, disagreement was about?"Mum, can you give me and three mates a lift to hack a kid to death with machetes?"
"Righto son. We won't worry about my car and registration being picked up by CCTV or your mate's tag. Let's go".
Didn't exactly need Sherlock Holmes to solve that one. But I cannot comprehend what they were thinking. If they did any thinking at all that is.
I imagine the son got a lighter sentence because he had a better lawyer.
jtremlett said:
wonder how that conversation went?
"Mum, can you give me and three mates a lift to hack a kid to death with machetes?"
"Righto son. We won't worry about my car and registration being picked up by CCTV or your mate's tag. Let's go".
Didn't exactly need Sherlock Holmes to solve that one. But I cannot comprehend what they were thinking. If they did any thinking at all that is.
I imagine the son got a lighter sentence because he had a better lawyer.
Police is now a numbers game to solve these crimes across gathering digital and forensic evidence. Nobody is thick enough to not realise this, they are all living in a world where they have a mindset that they will get away with it, they will be fine and someone else is going to cop the blame. "Mum, can you give me and three mates a lift to hack a kid to death with machetes?"
"Righto son. We won't worry about my car and registration being picked up by CCTV or your mate's tag. Let's go".
Didn't exactly need Sherlock Holmes to solve that one. But I cannot comprehend what they were thinking. If they did any thinking at all that is.
I imagine the son got a lighter sentence because he had a better lawyer.
It's very alarming, and I've seen Episode 2 that is even worse regarding this.
Bluedot said:
Anyone know if tonight's one is a repeat ? Not one I remember I must say.
'A man lies dead in a park in Peterborough and the positioning of his body raises intense suspicions, but rigor mortis has already set in and the trail of evidence is going cold. '
Is this the one where he died elsewhere and his friend moved the body from her flat (?) to the park ?'A man lies dead in a park in Peterborough and the positioning of his body raises intense suspicions, but rigor mortis has already set in and the trail of evidence is going cold. '
Vasco said:
Bluedot said:
Anyone know if tonight's one is a repeat ? Not one I remember I must say.
'A man lies dead in a park in Peterborough and the positioning of his body raises intense suspicions, but rigor mortis has already set in and the trail of evidence is going cold. '
Is this the one where he died elsewhere and his friend moved the body from her flat (?) to the park ?'A man lies dead in a park in Peterborough and the positioning of his body raises intense suspicions, but rigor mortis has already set in and the trail of evidence is going cold. '
Did watch tonight’s one first time around but watched it again tonight.
It’s easy to live a ‘normal’ life and not have anything to do with the people featured but it really is a view of how destructive drugs and addiction are, literally turning people into zombies. Felt for both the victim and offender in this one.
It’s easy to live a ‘normal’ life and not have anything to do with the people featured but it really is a view of how destructive drugs and addiction are, literally turning people into zombies. Felt for both the victim and offender in this one.
Gassing Station | TV, Film, Video Streaming & Radio | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff