Would you take a 4 year old to a certificate 12a film?

Would you take a 4 year old to a certificate 12a film?

Poll: Would you take a 4 year old to a certificate 12a film?

Total Members Polled: 89

I wouldn't take any child under 12: 20%
I would take one, but 4 is too young: 55%
Perhaps - depends on the child: 17%
Yes, no problem. 12's are for babies: 8%
Author
Discussion

blindswelledrat

Original Poster:

25,257 posts

234 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
I want to go and see Monsters at the weekend which is a certificate 12 which means something along the lines of "not recommended for under 12s although they are allowed if accompanied by an adult".
It sounds like this film is a bit scary along the lines of CLovefield with a couple of eff words.
So anyway- I want to take my 4 year old with me but can't help feeling irresponsible etc thus Im leaning towards not doing it.

What do you all reckon? What age would you take a child to see a 12 rated film?

Daniel1

2,931 posts

200 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
Depends on the film: Spiderman maybe, but not monsters.

Mojooo

12,813 posts

182 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
I would not take a 4 year old to a cinema at all.

Not least for a 12 rated film they may get bored and start kicking up a fuss.

PedantLosesGrip

4,106 posts

212 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
A 10 or 11 yr old, maybe, but not 4.

Mrs Fish

30,018 posts

260 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
I have taken my 3 year old and 5 year old to the cinema, no problems with either of them.

I wouldn't take them to see a 12 film though unless I had vetted it first. For instance I have let my 5 year old watch films such as Ironman (12) but I watched it first smile

davepoth

29,395 posts

201 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
One of two things will happen.

1)Kid will get bored and ruin the film for you and everyone in the cinema; or

2)Kid will get st scared and cry, and ruin the film for you and everyone in the cinema, as well as wetting the bed for the next 9 years.

Your choice really. wink

toxicated

718 posts

215 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
I remember seeing the Return of the King from Lord of the Rings on the day it was released (rated 12). At the front of the queue for the 11pm showing was a couple with kids around 6 and 8 - definitely not the right age for either the time or film.

y282

20,566 posts

174 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
are you the f***er that keeps ruining filums for me?

blindswelledrat

Original Poster:

25,257 posts

234 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
WHy move this to TV and Film? Is it some kind of moderators aspergers which makes you see the word "film" and have to move it like an OCD housewife?
This is a question about children and age guidances. How does that belong in TV and film?

Big Al.

68,967 posts

260 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
Sorry haven't you heard we're shutting down the lounge! wink

Fatman2

1,464 posts

171 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
Some friends took their 7 and 10 year old to see the Dark Knight when it came out because they thought Batman would be cool.

They're not sheltered kids but screamed the cinema down and they had to leave after 20 mins.

I'm probably a bit OTT with my kids but there's no way I'd expose them to the type of subject matter a 12 would contain. Some may be able to handle it but at the age of 4 I wouldn't personally take the risk.

That's not a judgement of what you are suggesting, as it's worth a good discussion but, it's a fine line at that age IMHO.

y282

20,566 posts

174 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
if you're anything less than 100% sure the child is ok with it, why ruin several hundred peoples evening?

this is a real pet hate of mine.

JQ

5,787 posts

181 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
No chance. I've seen some pretty gruesome 12 rated movies. As I recall King Kong (the modern one) was a 12 and I thought at the time it inappropriate even for a 12 year old.

Pothole

34,367 posts

284 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
WHy move this to TV and Film? Is it some kind of moderators aspergers which makes you see the word "film" and have to move it like an OCD housewife?
This is a question about children and age guidances. How does that belong in TV and film?
don't try and apply logic to jerking knees...

Adam B

27,415 posts

256 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
a bit scary along the lines of CLovefield with a couple of eff words.
wtf? that would be a no then. I have taken my (just) 4 year old to the cinema twice to see Toy Story 3 and Shrek 3, she loved the 3D glasses and set there mesmerised apart from when the seat spring pushed her back with her legs in the air rofl but cute

would never take her to anything that had human violence or swearing

sparks_E39

12,738 posts

215 months

Thursday 2nd December 2010
quotequote all
I had seen the first 3 Lethal Weapon and Die Hard films by age ten in 1997, at home with my dad. Loved them then love them now.

Carl_Spackler

2,664 posts

190 months

Friday 3rd December 2010
quotequote all
My 4 year old didn't like Transformers 2 at all, the Transformer girl and her tounge had him a bit upset.

I forward through most bits of The Dark Knight too, Dent's two face, pencil in the eye and various other bit's would have him with that worried look on his face.

I'd say no.

(All of these are Blueray watching, not cinema)

swiftpete

1,894 posts

195 months

Friday 3rd December 2010
quotequote all
My 5 year old niece started crying while watching ratatouille. I can't even imagine what she would have been like watching monsters. Also, what are small children most scared of? Monsters. S/he will be stting themselves, probably literally.

Jasandjules

70,012 posts

231 months

Friday 3rd December 2010
quotequote all
4 years old is too young IMHO to sit in a cinema and watch a film for an hour without getting bored and wanting to play up and run around. So No.

130R

6,815 posts

208 months

Friday 3rd December 2010
quotequote all
I've seen this film and I wouldn't think it is suitable for a 4 year old. There is nothing particularly bad in it but the (infrequently shown) monsters would be too scary for a 4 year old I would have thought. There is also some mild gore, with dead bodies shown, and a couple of instances of bad language I think. Additionally a 4 year old would probably be bored stupid by 99% of the film.