Babylon 5 - is this all I need?

Author
Discussion

chris watton

Original Poster:

22,477 posts

262 months

Wednesday 8th February 2012
quotequote all
I have never watched one episode of Babylon 5, but I have since heard that it is very good, with good effects and excellent story arcs. With this in mind, I have bought series 1-4 and the movie 'In the Beginning', as, from what I have read, series 5 has little to do with the main story, and the other movies and offshoots are not very good at all. Would that be a fair thing to say?

chris watton

Original Poster:

22,477 posts

262 months

Wednesday 8th February 2012
quotequote all
joe_90 said:
Have you watched BSG?
Of course! I have the whole collection - what self-respecting sci-fi nut wouldn't? hehe

chris watton

Original Poster:

22,477 posts

262 months

Wednesday 8th February 2012
quotequote all
joe_90 said:
chris watton said:
Of course! I have the whole collection - what self-respecting sci-fi nut wouldn't? hehe
And you think B5 will trump it.. Nothing can.. or ever will, its just downhill from now..
So, what you're saying is don't bother watching any other sci-fi series, as BSG has rendered all others unworthy?

I just fancied something a little different to watch, instead of the same stuff I usually watch (for the Nth time). Many seem to rate Babylon 5, so I thought I'd give it a go (having missed this one completely), what I bought didn't even amount to £20...

chris watton

Original Poster:

22,477 posts

262 months

Wednesday 8th February 2012
quotequote all
RemaL said:
yet you have not watched Babylon 5.
An oversight that I have just rectified. smile

chris watton

Original Poster:

22,477 posts

262 months

Wednesday 8th February 2012
quotequote all
Happy82 said:
Season 1 is very early 90s cheese, especially the Commando style music laugh However the acting picks up in season 2, as do the effects and music and it's one of the best sci fi series out there smile You'll see similarities to DS9, and also the reason that the writer of B5 was so pissed off when Paramount originally turned him down and then 'created' DS9shortly after hehe

BSG will need something epic to take it's #1 spot for sci fi series, but B5 is a good contender smile

I assume you've seen the other cheese-fest that is Andromeda?
Cheers for that (and others smile )

I don't think I watched B5 at the time because there were so many crap'n'cheesy US Sci-Fi series’ at the time, Andromeda being one of them - I just thought that B5 was just another annoyingly mediocre, too American series – so I steered clear. I never liked or got into the Star gate series’ either – most are way too soap-opera-ish.

I say that, but I think some of the Star Trek TNG are OK/tolerable, but only the ones without Wesley crusher, Rodenberry’s Jar Jar Binks for sure – some episodes are so cringworthingly bad I simply cannot watch them. Also Voyager, when they dedicate episodes to Chakoty (sp!) – are we really meant to believe he still practices his Indian religion, even though they class 1937 as ‘ancient history’ – it would be like an English sci-fi series who’s main character still practiced Druidy – both equally implausible and ridiculous.

chris watton

Original Poster:

22,477 posts

262 months

Wednesday 8th February 2012
quotequote all
Twincam16 said:
I know what you mean - I have a love-hate relationship with Star Trek. Generally speaking, I think the movies are terrific (with the exception of Generations), but I've never really got to grips with the TV series. The original '60s one is endearing but badly dated at times. That said, the acting isn't bad, which overcomes the fact that all the sets are made of cardboard and they land on the same planet every week.

However, I really can't get on with TNG, Voyager or Enterprise. DS9 was a masterstroke and added genuine depth to the characters (who, as in any drama, are far more important than anything to do with the special effects). TNG funnily enough hasn't visually dated much, but its politics have - it's clearly from a time when the Cold War was coming to an end, the Californian ex-hippies were running American commerce and Bill Clinton was president, and as a result it comes across as though it's been written by the Liberal Democrats. Funnily enough, the plots seem to be a left-wing version of 'Team America: Galaxy Police', where this wise and benevolent Federation gads about the cosmos solving everyone else's problems. Same goes for Voyager. Neither would work post-Iraq without looking like hypocrisy.

Also, the problem I found with TNG was their over-reliance on made-up technology to provide whole chunks of the plot. As I understand it they employed physicists to make sure it all theoretically 'worked', but the result is that you need to be a total-immersion geek to 'get' it, and I don't have time for that. I remember the kids at school who did though :shudder:.

And then you get Enterprise, which seems to me to be an opportunity for Trekkies to fill in the gaps in a very self-congratulatory way. I just couldn't get into it at all.

I have a feeling I'll enjoy the new series of films far more.
Nicely put!

I too love the new Star Trek, even the kid's liked it, and they hate TNG!

ETA - regarding overtly injecting US left wing politics (Democrats) into otherwise decent shows stopped me buying the last 2 seasons of Boston legal - as they were nothing more than political broadcasts for Obama - so I just have seasons 1-3, and am quite happy with that...

Edited by chris watton on Wednesday 8th February 18:22

chris watton

Original Poster:

22,477 posts

262 months

Wednesday 8th February 2012
quotequote all
Rich_W said:
Not a Sci Fi person by any means. But B5 was very good and held my intrest.

Not sure I'd have bought the box set on a whim mind.
I am going to Italy for three weeks at the end of next week, so have a couple of very boring weekends and evenings. It has snowed badly, so no chance of getting anywhere so I anticipate I'll be in my hotel room quite a bit after work - hence the rush to buy and back up onto HD a few series. smile

In any case, spending less than £20 on what amounts to 24 DVD's containg 4 episodes each isn't what I'd call frivolous...

Edited by chris watton on Wednesday 8th February 19:51

chris watton

Original Poster:

22,477 posts

262 months

Wednesday 8th February 2012
quotequote all
My God!

hehe

chris watton

Original Poster:

22,477 posts

262 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
vxr8mate said:
You could almost miss the entire 1st season and just skip to the 2nd. Its later on they start referring back to what happened in the first season and then there’s not much of a reference.
I shall skip the 1st season then, and start at the 2nd. I can always watch the 1st if I need to at any point...

Edited by chris watton on Thursday 9th February 16:43

chris watton

Original Poster:

22,477 posts

262 months

Thursday 9th February 2012
quotequote all
rasto said:
If you do that you will miss out on 'arc' storyline setups though. If you can try and watch episodes 1,5,6,8,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,21 and 22. And if that is too many then try at least 18,19,20 and 22. But it is really worth watching it all as I think you may end up having a better understanding of why certain characters behave the way they do.
Cheers, have written the episodes down. smile