Cameron & Co attracting business during Olympics

Cameron & Co attracting business during Olympics

Author
Discussion

johnfm

Original Poster:

13,668 posts

251 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
On the news just now. Showing how they have set up an 'Embassy' to promote UK as a business destination.

Parked outside, promoting UK business brands, are a new Jaguar and a Landrover.

Are these British businesses any more? I thought JLR was a wholly owned subsidiary of TATA?

Shar2

2,222 posts

214 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
Well, they may be owned by TATA, but at least Jaguar and Landrover are built in this country and are doing rather well at the moment. So they may actually be something to show off.

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

158 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
johnfm said:
On the news just now. Showing how they have set up an 'Embassy' to promote UK as a business destination.

Parked outside, promoting UK business brands, are a new Jaguar and a Landrover.

Are these British businesses any more? I thought JLR was a wholly owned subsidiary of TATA?
You could apply that to most car manufacturers - who owns Ford, GM, Mercedes etc. How do you define the nationality of a company - where they design and build or the country the majority of the shareholders live?

johnfm

Original Poster:

13,668 posts

251 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
Caulkhead said:
You could apply that to most car manufacturers - who owns Ford, GM, Mercedes etc. How do you define the nationality of a company - where they design and build or the country the majority of the shareholders live?
Well, I would suggest a company that was not doing too well for its previous owners (Ford, maybe?) and rescued by an Indian company isn't really a British company. It is, undoubtedly a British brand - and a very good pair of brands they are.

Gargamel

15,028 posts

262 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
johnfm said:
Well, I would suggest a company that was not doing too well for its previous owners (Ford, maybe?) and rescued by an Indian company isn't really a British company. It is, undoubtedly a British brand - and a very good pair of brands they are.
Keeping up with the trends in Globalisation are your John. the Brits have always been relaxed about National Icons. Our patron Saint is Spanish or Something. Our National Drink is grown in Africa, China or India. Our best batsman is Saffer, our Queen is German and our Marbles are Greek.


Welshbeef

49,633 posts

199 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
Caulkhead said:
You could apply that to most car manufacturers - who owns Ford, GM, Mercedes etc. How do you define the nationality of a company - where they design and build or the country the majority of the shareholders live?
It doesn't matter to me what nationality a company is its where the product is made and made to world class standards. Ie that it would be difficult for the company to move production elsewhere without suffering an inferior product.
I'm very proud of all our British car production and all the suppliers who are in that network.

Good on Jag and LR well deserved.
Good on Mini too
Good on McLaren
To name but a few.



New POD

3,851 posts

151 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
johnfm said:
On the news just now. Showing how they have set up an 'Embassy' to promote UK as a business destination.

Parked outside, promoting UK business brands, are a new Jaguar and a Landrover.

Are these British businesses any more? I thought JLR was a wholly owned subsidiary of TATA?
An Indian Company, who bought 2 Iconic British names from an American Company, One of which was previously owned by a German Company, and invested (with the UK tax payers help) in both product design and manufacturing facilities in the UK, after the unions agreed to be more flexible. It's pretty much the best manufacturing story we have isn't it.

I suppose we have the Trent 900, 1000 and XWB at Rolls Royce in Derby. and the JCB's from Staffordshire, and 100000 plus , aerospace, defence and automotive suppliers who are still making bits in the UK, because they can't be arsed to outsourse to china.



New POD

3,851 posts

151 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
Welshbeef said:
It doesn't matter to me what nationality a company is its where the product is made and made to world class standards. Ie that it would be difficult for the company to move production elsewhere without suffering an inferior product.
I'm very proud of all our British car production and all the suppliers who are in that network.

Good on Jag and LR well deserved.
Good on Mini too
Good on McLaren
To name but a few.
Marcos, Westfield, Caterham, Ginetta, Morgan, Honda, Toyota, Nissan, BMW (who make Rolls Royce Cars) VW (who make Bentleys), Vauxhall, sorry GM, (who make the astra)

Caulkhead

4,938 posts

158 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
johnfm said:
Caulkhead said:
You could apply that to most car manufacturers - who owns Ford, GM, Mercedes etc. How do you define the nationality of a company - where they design and build or the country the majority of the shareholders live?
Well, I would suggest a company that was not doing too well for its previous owners (Ford, maybe?) and rescued by an Indian company isn't really a British company. It is, undoubtedly a British brand - and a very good pair of brands they are.
Well, Chrysler were rescued by Mercedes so Jeeps were German, Ford own Mazda so an MX5 is American, but the Ford family only own 2% of the shares now and many are Chinese owned maybe the MX5 is Chinese and a GTR is French 'coz Renault own Nissan using your method.

martin84

5,366 posts

154 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
I don't know why we get so bogged down with who owns the company when it comes to cars. Jeeps are American, Jaguars are British and Mazdas are Japanese. End of. They may be subsideries of companies from another country but that doesn't mean the company or brand changes.

Asda is a subsidery of Wal-Mart but do we view Asda as American? No, it's a British company. A British company owned by an American company but a British company none the less.

Cyder

7,067 posts

221 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
Caulkhead said:
johnfm said:
Caulkhead said:
You could apply that to most car manufacturers - who owns Ford, GM, Mercedes etc. How do you define the nationality of a company - where they design and build or the country the majority of the shareholders live?
Well, I would suggest a company that was not doing too well for its previous owners (Ford, maybe?) and rescued by an Indian company isn't really a British company. It is, undoubtedly a British brand - and a very good pair of brands they are.
Well, Chrysler were rescued by Mercedes so Jeeps were German, Ford own Mazda so an MX5 is American, but the Ford family only own 2% of the shares now and many are Chinese owned maybe the MX5 is Chinese and a GTR is French 'coz Renault own Nissan using your method.
And a Clio is Japanese cos Nissan also own part of Renault nuts

It's a grey old area and very difficult to define, to give an example, the Qashqai was styled, designed, engineered and built in the UK using a very high percentage of parts sourced from the UK and Europe.

martin84

5,366 posts

154 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
I do wonder why Ford - the worlds fifth biggest car maker and at one point in the 00s the third - couldn't make a proper success of Jaguar/LandRover but some company nobodies heard of in India is doing it so much better.

fido

16,842 posts

256 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
I don't know why we get so bogged down with who owns the company when it comes to cars. Jeeps are American, Jaguars are British and Mazdas are Japanese. End of. They may be subsideries of companies from another country but that doesn't mean the company or brand changes.
So by your logic what is a Mini Countryman? It's a British marque but it isn't made here.

martin84

5,366 posts

154 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
fido said:
So by your logic what is a Mini Countryman?
It's st.

fido

16,842 posts

256 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
It's st.
Well i wouldn't personally disagree with that description - but is it British st or German st or Austrian st? wink

martin84

5,366 posts

154 months

Thursday 26th July 2012
quotequote all
German st of course. If it was good then it'd be British.

XCP

16,956 posts

229 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
'Our queen is German'
Funny, I thought she was born in London.

glazbagun

14,295 posts

198 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
I do wonder why Ford - the worlds fifth biggest car maker and at one point in the 00s the third - couldn't make a proper success of Jaguar/LandRover but some company nobodies heard of in India is doing it so much better.
Because Ford have been useless for years and TATA are massive. When I heard they were going to buy out Jaguar I thought it would be the best thing to happen to the company since the XK6.

A.J.M

7,940 posts

187 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
martin84 said:
I do wonder why Ford - the worlds fifth biggest car maker and at one point in the 00s the third - couldn't make a proper success of Jaguar/LandRover but some company nobodies heard of in India is doing it so much better.
Ford spent loads on Landrover, the discovery 3, range rover sport, the 05 facelift of the range rover to Jag engines and freelander 2 were all conceived under their control. Same with jag for the XF, XK and XJ. All started under Ford but Ford were in major financial trouble and the man put in charge to fix it, was told to fix FORD. Not Aston Martin, or Jaguar or Landrover, so they were all sold off to help bring in some quick cash, even though Aston and Landrover were huge profit maker's, Jaguar were at the turning point from years in the red to getting back into the black.

Tata are now reaping the harvest that was sown from Ford.

Anyway, Jaguar and Landrover are British, the world know's them as a British brand and they play that image to their advantage. Long may it continue.


martin84

5,366 posts

154 months

Friday 27th July 2012
quotequote all
I do remember when Ford were buying up car companies with gay abandon and it was obvious they'd have to sell when they ran into trouble. Ford are a great company and I've always been a big fan of their cars. I like the Jag's from the Ford era also, I'm not keen on the styling of the new ones as I prefer four round headlights on a Jaguar.

Do Ford still own Volvo?