Bianca Williams partner stopped by police again
Discussion
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/aug/14/sp...
He recorded the interaction in his Tesla. I don't think he has done himself any favours this time by doing so.
He recorded the interaction in his Tesla. I don't think he has done himself any favours this time by doing so.
272BHP said:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/aug/14/sp...
He recorded the interaction in his Tesla. I don't think he has done himself any favours this time by doing so.
Really, given what happened the previous time, when both of them were handcuffed whilst the baby was left alone in the car. Do you think it is appropriate that seven police officers were sent to deal with this, you know, someone suspected of using their mobile phone whilst driving? Their three year old child's details are now on a police database - why?He recorded the interaction in his Tesla. I don't think he has done himself any favours this time by doing so.
The Met Police have a very bad history, very bad indeed and you don't need to scratch the surface very deeply to come up with absolute horror stories about them.
I would advise anyone to record any interaction like this one with police, because quite frankly, they cannot be trusted.
I’d like to see the bit of the video in between him pulling alongside the police car, and then the stop.
Because according to other reports, he exchanged words with the police and then drove off for another 5 minutes. That’s a long time to find a spot to stop. So I can understand why the police treated it as a fail to stop.
That said, you’d have thought they’d have checked his plate and seen notes against it. Failure of the attitude test on both sides really.
Because according to other reports, he exchanged words with the police and then drove off for another 5 minutes. That’s a long time to find a spot to stop. So I can understand why the police treated it as a fail to stop.
That said, you’d have thought they’d have checked his plate and seen notes against it. Failure of the attitude test on both sides really.
andyA700 said:
Really, given what happened the previous time, when both of them were handcuffed whilst the baby was left alone in the car. Do you think it is appropriate that seven police officers were sent to deal with this, you know, someone suspected of using their mobile phone whilst driving? Their three year old child's details are now on a police database - why?
The Met Police have a very bad history, very bad indeed and you don't need to scratch the surface very deeply to come up with absolute horror stories about them.
I would advise anyone to record any interaction like this one with police, because quite frankly, they cannot be trusted.
Let’s just put this into perspective The Met Police have a very bad history, very bad indeed and you don't need to scratch the surface very deeply to come up with absolute horror stories about them.
I would advise anyone to record any interaction like this one with police, because quite frankly, they cannot be trusted.
It was 4am .. officers in one car saw the Tesla being driven and believed the driver was using a mobile phone
They indicated for it to stop
The vehicle failed to stop and the officers in the first car called for advanced pursuit trained assistance (someone on Twitter has plotted the distance and it was about 2 miles)
When the advanced pursuit vehicles with pursuit trained officers arrived and signalled for the car to stop .. it didn’t
A Police Armed response vehicle overtook the car and slowed in front of it
The Tesla attempted to drive around the Police ARV
The Armed offficers were there as they were in
1. An advanced pursuit authorised vehicle
2. They are advanced trained drivers who are authorised to pursue
Summons him for using a phone (if he was) and failing to stop for police
Complete non story
CheesecakeRunner said:
Surely they see the registered keeper? And if what he says about him and his kids have records against them, then that’d pop up.
No it wouldn’t In any case what relevance does it have an unidentified person in the vehicle committing an offence that the officers are dealing with in real time ?
Does having a previous “publicised” interaction with the police mean you can just do what you like with a “get out of jail free card” ?
CheesecakeRunner said:
Surely they see the registered keeper? And if what he says about him and his kids have records against them, then that’d pop up.
It would show the registered keeper's name and vehicle details but it doesn't immediately show dealings that person has had with the police. And if you'd never heard of the bloke, you wouldn't think anything of it.Besides, you wouldn't be reading everything about him in that situation, you'd be dealing with the fact he was failing to stop.
Earthdweller said:
Let’s just put this into perspective
It was 4am .. officers in one car saw the Tesla being driven and believed the driver was using a mobile phone
They indicated for it to stop
The vehicle failed to stop and the officers in the first car called for advanced pursuit trained assistance (someone on Twitter has plotted the distance and it was about 2 miles)
When the advanced pursuit vehicles with pursuit trained officers arrived and signalled for the car to stop .. it didn’t
A Police Armed response vehicle overtook the car and slowed in front of it
The Tesla attempted to drive around the Police ARV
The Armed offficers were there as they were in
1. An advanced pursuit authorised vehicle
2. They are advanced trained drivers who are authorised to pursue
Summons him for using a phone (if he was) and failing to stop for police
Complete non story
This exactly, from his own video he drove past lots of places where it was perfectly safe to stop. He seems out to create situations for his own agenda. It was 4am .. officers in one car saw the Tesla being driven and believed the driver was using a mobile phone
They indicated for it to stop
The vehicle failed to stop and the officers in the first car called for advanced pursuit trained assistance (someone on Twitter has plotted the distance and it was about 2 miles)
When the advanced pursuit vehicles with pursuit trained officers arrived and signalled for the car to stop .. it didn’t
A Police Armed response vehicle overtook the car and slowed in front of it
The Tesla attempted to drive around the Police ARV
The Armed offficers were there as they were in
1. An advanced pursuit authorised vehicle
2. They are advanced trained drivers who are authorised to pursue
Summons him for using a phone (if he was) and failing to stop for police
Complete non story
Wonder if the officer(s) in the first car will get disciplinary for racially profiling him as the last lot did. Ie they pulled him over because it was 4am and they didn’t like the look of him and the using a phone was just an excuse.
Does tesla film inside too? To prove he never used his phone. He’s created a drama so I’m certain he wasn’t using it, if he had been he wouldn’t have done this.
Does tesla film inside too? To prove he never used his phone. He’s created a drama so I’m certain he wasn’t using it, if he had been he wouldn’t have done this.
hstewie said:Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff