Oz body slam, now house mistress abuses boys in NSW.
Discussion
An Australian school house mistress who sexually abused six boys should be sentenced on the basis of her crimes, not her gender, a Sydney judge has been told.
In December, Judge Garling rejected her defence of mental illness, finding her guilty of 21 sex offences involving boys, aged 11 or 12, who attended the NSW school where she worked.
The 2009 offences included 18 counts of sexual intercourse, involving fellatio and penile-vaginal penetration.
In one incident when five boys were in a tent, she was naked and asked: "Does anyone want a blow job?"
Full story:
www.stuff.co.nz/world/australia/4793551/House-mist...
So what's the consensus?
Better or worse than bloke and young girls?
Lock her up?
Wish you had been there?
In December, Judge Garling rejected her defence of mental illness, finding her guilty of 21 sex offences involving boys, aged 11 or 12, who attended the NSW school where she worked.
The 2009 offences included 18 counts of sexual intercourse, involving fellatio and penile-vaginal penetration.
In one incident when five boys were in a tent, she was naked and asked: "Does anyone want a blow job?"
Full story:
www.stuff.co.nz/world/australia/4793551/House-mist...
So what's the consensus?
Better or worse than bloke and young girls?
Lock her up?
Wish you had been there?
I think it should be the same punishment as if it was a man. It will still have messed the kids up.
caziques said:
In one incident when five boys were in a tent, she was naked and asked: "Does anyone want a blow job?"
If she was decent looking and they were a few years older that would have pretty much been the dream for any young guy!No note of her age, but with 11-12yo boys(or girls for that matter) it's a big no-no and she should be prosecuted as a paedophile imho.
Now if the boys/girls would be 15/16 and she 22 or the like, it's a different matter imo. She could still be prosecuted as she abuses her position as a teacher/... and that's "not done", but I wouldn't think she's a paedophile.
Now if the boys/girls would be 15/16 and she 22 or the like, it's a different matter imo. She could still be prosecuted as she abuses her position as a teacher/... and that's "not done", but I wouldn't think she's a paedophile.
joe_90 said:
Is she fit?
brilliant:
Defence lawyer Christopher Watson said while the boys suffered harm, the damage was "unlikely to be as significant" as if the perpetrator was male and the victims female, "because of the actual nature of the act".
Seems a very reasonable mitigation to me. It is different to the adult male-pubescent girl scenario.brilliant:
Defence lawyer Christopher Watson said while the boys suffered harm, the damage was "unlikely to be as significant" as if the perpetrator was male and the victims female, "because of the actual nature of the act".
Godzuki said:
singlecoil said:
Paedophilia is a state of mind, not a criminal activity.
Ah, so someone who molests multiple underage boys is NOT a paedophile. They do it for other reasons? What were her 'other reasons'?ACTING on those urges CAN be a crime depending on the nature of those actions.
People find it very difficult to differentiate between thoughts and actions.
George Orwell wasn't wrong.
Eric Mc said:
Singlecoil is correct. BEING a paedophile or having a paedophile mentality is NOT a crime. There is no such criminal offence in the statute books.
ACTING on those urges CAN be a crime depending on the nature of those actions.
People find it very difficult to differentiate between thoughts and actions.
George Orwell wasn't wrong.
I never said it was a crime. However this woman DID commit a crime, and molested kids. Now if this was a man, as someone said, they would be shouting it from the rooftops, but why not this woman? ACTING on those urges CAN be a crime depending on the nature of those actions.
People find it very difficult to differentiate between thoughts and actions.
George Orwell wasn't wrong.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff