Your Tits are not killing you, love.

[The Don of Croy]

I think the manufacturer / supplier is 100% responsible. Even though they are defunct, they were in business and to do so would have had insurance cover in place at that time.

Ergo, the insurance company covering their risks is in the frame (if it is also still trading).

If the manufacturer had been UK based then the full might of the EU would have come down on us, and the supine UK government would have coughed up whatever compensation they demanded. See BP and Gulf spills.

The bigger question on body re-alignment / self image enhancement etc is still to be settled. Hopefully it will give pause for thought.

[hollydog]

The Don of Croy said:

I think the manufacturer / supplier is 100% responsible. Even though they are defunct, they were in business and to do so would have had insurance cover in place at that time.

Ergo, the insurance company covering their risks is in the frame (if it is also still trading).

If the manufacturer had been UK based then the full might of the EU would have come down on us, and the supine UK government would have coughed up whatever compensation they demanded. See BP and Gulf spills.

The bigger question on body re-alignment / self image enhancement etc is still to be settled. Hopefully it will give pause for thought.

Yet again i agree if the shoe was on the other foot the British government would be made to pay out. They where insured at the time but because the owner of pip didn't use the incorrect gel it made the insurance foreclose on him.

Edited by hollydog on Thursday 21st June 15:43