Jeremy Clarkson suspended by BBC...
Discussion
hairyben said:
The Don of Croy said:
I like this BBC piece;
"At the time, he said the BBC had told him he would be sacked if he made "one more offensive remark, anywhere, at any time".
- so letting go a stray word someone, somewhere might find offensive would result in immediate dismissal, but Savile could grope and bugger his way across the decades at Television Centre without censure...
saville never challenged the beebs feeble political sensibilities while laughing about it though did he."At the time, he said the BBC had told him he would be sacked if he made "one more offensive remark, anywhere, at any time".
- so letting go a stray word someone, somewhere might find offensive would result in immediate dismissal, but Savile could grope and bugger his way across the decades at Television Centre without censure...
You can see who the real monsters are .
It's not about a left wing bias.
It is about a guy, who thinks he is bigger than the show itself, continually running into problems with the regulators and now allegedly hitting a producer?
If you continually got your company hauled up in front of the regulators, then you punched someone whilst on your final warning, would you still expect management to brush over the issue and not suspend you, no matter how good you were?
Really, if the report in the link is true, it is about someone punching another employee, that is what it is coming down to, surely we are not condoning that?
It is about a guy, who thinks he is bigger than the show itself, continually running into problems with the regulators and now allegedly hitting a producer?
If you continually got your company hauled up in front of the regulators, then you punched someone whilst on your final warning, would you still expect management to brush over the issue and not suspend you, no matter how good you were?
Really, if the report in the link is true, it is about someone punching another employee, that is what it is coming down to, surely we are not condoning that?
p1stonhead said:
Amazed they canceled Sunday's show.
Agree with others, the show won't work without him so every tv channel on the planet will be lining up to bring him to their top gear.
Stupid move by the BBC
Gary Lineker was the 'star in a car' for this Sunday's show. He's tweeted 'I don't think I'm ever meant to appear on Top Gear!'Agree with others, the show won't work without him so every tv channel on the planet will be lining up to bring him to their top gear.
Stupid move by the BBC
Worse though is this tweet: 'I'm available.' Piers Morgan.
and seems everyone is in on it...
David Baddiel tweeted what he thought was a joke, but ended up showing he can't spell:
'So JC has been suspended following 'a Fracas'. Who makes them, Citreon?'
smn159 said:
Assuming that the Radio Times is correct and Clarkson punched a member of the production team, how do you suggest that his employer should have responded?
Depends what the other guy did to elicit that response.Name them both or neither. Suspend them both. In the investigation if t turns out Jeremy just attacked him for no reason then sack Jeremy and involve the police. In fact involve the police from the start if it's as bad as that.
The show is about three mates dicking about. Take away one mate (the most vocal and opinionated one) and the entertainment isn't there, the dynamic is lost. If Clarkson goes that's Top Gear done for. It may continue to be made and broadcast with a new presenter(s) but it's still done for.
Pesty said:
smn159 said:
Assuming that the Radio Times is correct and Clarkson punched a member of the production team, how do you suggest that his employer should have responded?
Depends what the other guy did to elicit that response.Name them both or neither. Suspend them both. In the investigation if t turns out Jeremy just attacked him for no reason then sack Jeremy and involve the police. In fact involve the police from the start if it's as bad as that.
Wills2 said:
The show won't work without the dynamic of the 3 of them, it won't work with Chris Evans or Chris Harris, if he gets sacked that's it.
They will have to go and do the same show for someone else, if the contract allows for it.
Hammond and May must be on good money and under contract so would they go if the show carried on? I've no idea how good friends they all are really.They will have to go and do the same show for someone else, if the contract allows for it.
B17NNS said:
The show is about three mates dicking about. Take away one mate (the most vocal and opinionated one) and the entertainment isn't there, the dynamic is lost. If Clarkson goes that's Top Gear done for. It may continue to be made and broadcast with a new presenter(s) but it's still done for.
This, its long been the car equivalent of The last of the summer wine.smn159 said:
p1stonhead said:
Stupid move by the BBC
Assuming that the Radio Times is correct and Clarkson punched a member of the production team, how do you suggest that his employer should have responded?The Beeb is snugly in bed with Labour, so it's out of order this time.
In case you've forgotten, behold, the Red Baron goes forth...
Amirhussain said:
If Clarkson goes from Top Gear, for me it is finished. All 3 of them work well together, the friendship and banter is what makes the show. No Clarkson =st.
Chris Harris, don't make me laugh.
Harris is a really good jurno - not sure he would/could replace JC in the role he plays. Chris Harris, don't make me laugh.
JC/JM/Hamster will simply continue to make the show but sell it to another channel
Sky
Itv
Ch4
Ch5
Discovery
History channel
Dave
If some of you read The Sunday Times for JC's comments. You would realise the TG presenter is a boy's own character. More important. Does the BBC have the legal right to pull a programme that licence fee payers have paid for and want to see. Still shows TOTP with all of its kiddy fiddlers.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff