The U.S.A. Mass Shootings Thread

The U.S.A. Mass Shootings Thread

Author
Discussion

Captain Raymond Holt

12,231 posts

196 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
Looks like thoughts and prayers are in order again.

kowalski655

14,717 posts

145 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
The US must order them in bulk.

Just take the guns and offer thoughts and prayers to the butthurt .. works with shooting victims after all

anonymous-user

56 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
At least the US police are never sitting twiddling their thumbs.

chrispmartha

15,616 posts

131 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all



God given right?

Nothing will change over there, when they decided someone going into a school on a killing spree wasn’t worthy of changing things it was obvious they don’t care.


Derek Smith

45,869 posts

250 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
red_slr said:
I keep saying it over and over again but the British public seem to think they know better.
We might not know better, but we certainly do it better. As do virtually all other 'western' countries.

Blaming video games, when all the other countries in the top 10 users of video games have hardly any mass shootings, shows that even those in charge know they are doing something wrong. If everyone else has cracked it, it's the time to look at others to see how they do it, rather than saying, over and over again, that you've got it right, and something/someone else is at fault.


TheRainMaker

6,380 posts

244 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
red_slr said:
I keep saying it over and over again but the British public seem to think they know better.
We might not know better, but we certainly do it better. As do virtually all other 'western' countries.

Blaming video games, when all the other countries in the top 10 users of video games have hardly any mass shootings, shows that even those in charge know they are doing something wrong. If everyone else has cracked it, it's the time to look at others to see how they do it, rather than saying, over and over again, that you've got it right, and something/someone else is at fault.
TBF the Britsih public seem to have grasped the fact that fewer guns = fewer gun deaths, so I guess they do know better.

red_slr

17,424 posts

191 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
I was referring to the "AR 15 for hunting? No way." post.

I have quoted below for reference.

As I say, people in the UK seem to *know* everything about US gun laws when in reality they know probably as close to nothing as is possible. Hunting in the US is actually quite restricted and the laws are complex. Very, very few British people will be able to even tell you some of the most basic rules and regulations, but they are able to make statements such as "no way" would you ever use an AR for hunting, when in fact its very, very popular in some parts of the US for exactly that!

As for video games, no idea, not something I have commented on in this thread as I know little about them.


red_slr said:
rambo19 said:
Dr Jekyll said:
Suitable. but there is an obvious advantage in using a semi automatic.

I've only done target shooting but from using both I'd choose to shoot an AR-15 type rather than a Bolt action Lee Enfield given the choice.
AR-15 for hunting? No way.
Very very common, especially in the south.

Common to see hunters driving round on trucks at night shooting hogs. Even helicopters day or night, its big business as the hogs cause a lot of damage to crops. Hogs and deer are the 2 most hunted animals in the US and both are regularly shot with .223 although 300BLK and SPC are very popular too.

That said for AR the .450BM is now a very popular platform in some states. This is because many states prohibit bottle neck cartridges.

And this is the problem, Brits tend to think they know what they are talking about when it comes to US gun laws but they really really don't as its a complex area of US law especially more so as soon as you start hunting. There are rifle zones, mag limits, cartridge limits, ammunition restrictions, time restrictions, clothing restrictions etc etc.

So saying, no way you could use an AR15 to hunt with would literally get you laughed out of any gun shop in the USA.

I keep saying it over and over again but the British public seem to think they know better.

bitchstewie

52,068 posts

212 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
They have no chance when this is how politicians respond.

That said, people voted for him so once again something awful happens and as a nation they appear incapable or unwilling to do anything to try to prevent it.


Zirconia

36,010 posts

286 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
^^^^^^
Religion and politics should never work together.

Meanwhile, back in the real world.

rscott

14,835 posts

193 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
red_slr said:
I was referring to the "AR 15 for hunting? No way." post.

I have quoted below for reference.

As I say, people in the UK seem to *know* everything about US gun laws when in reality they know probably as close to nothing as is possible. Hunting in the US is actually quite restricted and the laws are complex. Very, very few British people will be able to even tell you some of the most basic rules and regulations, but they are able to make statements such as "no way" would you ever use an AR for hunting, when in fact its very, very popular in some parts of the US for exactly that!

As for video games, no idea, not something I have commented on in this thread as I know little about them.


red_slr said:
rambo19 said:
Dr Jekyll said:
Suitable. but there is an obvious advantage in using a semi automatic.

I've only done target shooting but from using both I'd choose to shoot an AR-15 type rather than a Bolt action Lee Enfield given the choice.
AR-15 for hunting? No way.
Very very common, especially in the south.

Common to see hunters driving round on trucks at night shooting hogs. Even helicopters day or night, its big business as the hogs cause a lot of damage to crops. Hogs and deer are the 2 most hunted animals in the US and both are regularly shot with .223 although 300BLK and SPC are very popular too.

That said for AR the .450BM is now a very popular platform in some states. This is because many states prohibit bottle neck cartridges.

And this is the problem, Brits tend to think they know what they are talking about when it comes to US gun laws but they really really don't as its a complex area of US law especially more so as soon as you start hunting. There are rifle zones, mag limits, cartridge limits, ammunition restrictions, time restrictions, clothing restrictions etc etc.

So saying, no way you could use an AR15 to hunt with would literally get you laughed out of any gun shop in the USA.

I keep saying it over and over again but the British public seem to think they know better.
If it's so great for hunting, then they could introduce a scheme like our shotgun licensing one.

All the other items you mention (time limits, mag sizes,etc) are restriction on how and where you hunt, not on what you can buy. Texas, for example, has no magazine size limit.

Condi

17,389 posts

173 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
red_slr said:
I was referring to the "AR 15 for hunting? No way." post.

I have quoted below for reference.

As I say, people in the UK seem to *know* everything about US gun laws when in reality they know probably as close to nothing as is possible. Hunting in the US is actually quite restricted and the laws are complex. Very, very few British people will be able to even tell you some of the most basic rules and regulations, but they are able to make statements such as "no way" would you ever use an AR for hunting, when in fact its very, very popular in some parts of the US for exactly that!

As for video games, no idea, not something I have commented on in this thread as I know little about them.


red_slr said:
rambo19 said:
Dr Jekyll said:
Suitable. but there is an obvious advantage in using a semi automatic.

I've only done target shooting but from using both I'd choose to shoot an AR-15 type rather than a Bolt action Lee Enfield given the choice.
AR-15 for hunting? No way.
Very very common, especially in the south.

Common to see hunters driving round on trucks at night shooting hogs. Even helicopters day or night, its big business as the hogs cause a lot of damage to crops. Hogs and deer are the 2 most hunted animals in the US and both are regularly shot with .223 although 300BLK and SPC are very popular too.
Is there not some contradiction in there? You say hunting is very restricted, and the laws quite complex, then say that its 'common to see hunters driving round on trucks. Even helicopters, day and night.'

And irrespective of hunting being restricted, there is a large availability of weapons which allows members of the public to own and use them, regardless of their intention of hunting or not.

In 2018 14,700 people died from firearms; so far this year 9,900 deaths have involved firearms. By contrast there have been 6,800 US service personal killed in Iraq and Afghanistan combined, in operations over 18 years.

red_slr

17,424 posts

191 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
Condi said:
In 2018 14,700 people died from firearms; so far this year 9,900 deaths have involved firearms. By contrast there have been 6,800 US service personal killed in Iraq and Afghanistan combined, in operations over 18 years.
Of that 14,700 around 350-450 are homicides committed with *any* rifle (so could be AR15, Ruger 10-22, Remington 700, M&P15-22 etc etc). Can you now see why the vast majority of US gun owners oppose restrictions on rifles?

There are 4 to 5 times more people murdered with knives in the USA than rifles.

Everyone is focusing on the wrong firearm.

TheRainMaker

6,380 posts

244 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
Gun deaths in the US yesterday.




Gary C

12,623 posts

181 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
They have no chance when this is how politicians respond.

That said, people voted for him so once again something awful happens and as a nation they appear incapable or unwilling to do anything to try to prevent it.

With people like him in power, they are fked.

Condi

17,389 posts

173 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
red_slr said:
Condi said:
In 2018 14,700 people died from firearms; so far this year 9,900 deaths have involved firearms. By contrast there have been 6,800 US service personal killed in Iraq and Afghanistan combined, in operations over 18 years.
Of that 14,700 around 350-450 are homicides committed with *any* rifle (so could be AR15, Ruger 10-22, Remington 700, M&P15-22 etc etc). Can you now see why the vast majority of US gun owners oppose restrictions on rifles?

There are 4 to 5 times more people murdered with knives in the USA than rifles.

Everyone is focusing on the wrong firearm.
Oh, I wasn't referring to any particular firearm, just firearms in general.

TheRainMaker

6,380 posts

244 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
red_slr said:
There are 4 to 5 times more people murdered with knives in the USA than rifles.

Everyone is focusing on the wrong firearm.
Not really, you really don't need a gun in modern society, which is were nearly all deaths happen.

Gary C

12,623 posts

181 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
red_slr said:
Can you now see why the vast majority of US gun owners oppose restrictions on rifles?

.
No, not really.

apart from the belief that more guns makes you safer ?

rscott

14,835 posts

193 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
red_slr said:
Condi said:
In 2018 14,700 people died from firearms; so far this year 9,900 deaths have involved firearms. By contrast there have been 6,800 US service personal killed in Iraq and Afghanistan combined, in operations over 18 years.
Of that 14,700 around 350-450 are homicides committed with *any* rifle (so could be AR15, Ruger 10-22, Remington 700, M&P15-22 etc etc). Can you now see why the vast majority of US gun owners oppose restrictions on rifles?

There are 4 to 5 times more people murdered with knives in the USA than rifles.

Everyone is focusing on the wrong firearm.
They're not. They're focusing on the firearms used most frequently in mass shootings. If semi automatic rifles were less easy to get, would those happen as frequently?

red_slr

17,424 posts

191 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
rscott said:
red_slr said:
Condi said:
In 2018 14,700 people died from firearms; so far this year 9,900 deaths have involved firearms. By contrast there have been 6,800 US service personal killed in Iraq and Afghanistan combined, in operations over 18 years.
Of that 14,700 around 350-450 are homicides committed with *any* rifle (so could be AR15, Ruger 10-22, Remington 700, M&P15-22 etc etc). Can you now see why the vast majority of US gun owners oppose restrictions on rifles?

There are 4 to 5 times more people murdered with knives in the USA than rifles.

Everyone is focusing on the wrong firearm.
They're not. They're focusing on the firearms used most frequently in mass shootings. If semi automatic rifles were less easy to get, would those happen as frequently?
I really do need to just give up on this thread. You cant just make things up as you go along.

Rifles are not used most frequently in mass shootings. Hand guns are.

In 114 Mass shootings analysed over 37 years the following number of firearms were used

Handguns = 141
Rifles = 53
Shotguns = 30


TheRainMaker

6,380 posts

244 months

Sunday 1st September 2019
quotequote all
red_slr said:
In 114 Mass shootings analysed over 37 years the following number of firearms were used

Handguns = 141
Rifles = 53
Shotguns = 30
Perfect, remove handguns as well.