More money to find missing girl
Discussion
Gecko1978 said:
This case like the missing boy (Ben was it) who was found to have been avcidenlty killed by a digger its likey in the end someone will confess.
Don't think it has been proven that he was accidentally killed by a digger (although likely), I think they are just going on that probable assumption due to a death bed confession (or similar) and the fact that there was building works going on at the time next door, so it all kind of ties up.All very sad.
oilbethere said:
It will never be solved. Abduction? No evidence of it. Parents involved? No evidence of it.
I can't understand how and why money is still being thrown at it?
There is evidence which supports claims she was abducted and there is evidence of claims which point towards parental involvement.I can't understand how and why money is still being thrown at it?
Fast Bug said:
Interesting piece on the cost of a missing person investigation. Turns out it isn't as much as this case
http://www.port.ac.uk/media/contacts-and-departmen...
That's because they don't generally have 30 murder squad detectives assigned to a missing person investigation.http://www.port.ac.uk/media/contacts-and-departmen...
TheSnitch said:
Fast Bug said:
Interesting piece on the cost of a missing person investigation. Turns out it isn't as much as this case
http://www.port.ac.uk/media/contacts-and-departmen...
That's because they don't generally have 30 murder squad detectives assigned to a missing person investigation.http://www.port.ac.uk/media/contacts-and-departmen...
PWeston said:
My money is on the Podesta brothers having some involvement - the police sketches are uncanny. Safe to say they will never be pursued though - too well connected and no amount of money will change that.
I am going to assume you are taking the piss because that one is the daftest of a whole bunch of daft conspiracy theoriesCzechItOut said:
There is evidence which supports claims she was abducted and there is evidence of claims which point towards parental involvement.
I'm still at a loss to see what 'evidence', specifically, there is which people claim points towards the parents being involved. I genuinely can't see any.There is no evidence that they murdered her, killed her by accident, abducted her or were party to any of that done by someone else.
The only evidence is that she is missing and that the last picture known to be taken f her was taken at such and such a time. There is nothing at all pointing towards the parents, jointly or severally, having any involvement.
TheSnitch said:
PWeston said:
My money is on the Podesta brothers having some involvement - the police sketches are uncanny. Safe to say they will never be pursued though - too well connected and no amount of money will change that.
I am going to assume you are taking the piss because that one is the daftest of a whole bunch of daft conspiracy theoriesThe e-fit (yes I know) sketches uncannily resemble them even if they were intended to be of one person. Until that can be explained then I will always have doubts. I dare you to tell me the sketches do not bear uncanny resemblance to the pair.
That is before one delves into the Podesta emails regarding a trip to Portugal around the same dates and their supposed link with paedophile Clement Freud (who also entertained the McCanns it would seem).
It may be a "conspiracy theory" (a useful tag for dismissing anything remotely uncomfortable) but until the above can be explained I am just not sure.
AJL308 said:
I'm still at a loss to see what 'evidence', specifically, there is which people claim points towards the parents being involved. I genuinely can't see any.
There is no evidence that they murdered her, killed her by accident, abducted her or were party to any of that done by someone else.
The only evidence is that she is missing and that the last picture known to be taken f her was taken at such and such a time. There is nothing at all pointing towards the parents, jointly or severally, having any involvement.
British sniffer dogs, one trained to identify blood and another dead bodies, both alerted behind the sofa in apartment 5A and later on in the hire car which the McCanns had rented 24 days after Maddie went missing.There is no evidence that they murdered her, killed her by accident, abducted her or were party to any of that done by someone else.
The only evidence is that she is missing and that the last picture known to be taken f her was taken at such and such a time. There is nothing at all pointing towards the parents, jointly or severally, having any involvement.
DNA evidence from inside the hire car.
Inconsistencies and timelines in the McCann's and Tapa Seven's statements.
Kate McCann's refusal to answer the Portugese police's questions (the so-called 46 questions).
Don't get the wrong, much of this has been brought into question and/or is circumstantial, I don't expect the witness statements to be perfect to the minute, but I certainly think there is enough here for the British police to question the McCanns.
irocfan said:
PWeston said:
My money is on the Podesta brothers having some involvement - the police sketches are uncanny. Safe to say they will never be pursued though - too well connected and no amount of money will change that.
look up on snopes 
I had seen their article on the subject - still does not not explain the resemblance! Who is responsible for the e-fits looking like the Podestas? Right down to a mole on Tony's face in the exact correct location FFS!
I am NOT saying this is proof of anything whatsoever, I would just like to know about the e-fits and who made them. Were they having a jape or what?!
PWeston said:
I dare you to tell me the sketches do not bear uncanny resemblance to the pair.
.
They do NOT bear an 'uncanny resemblance to the pair'.
Both men are and were a good 20 to 30 years older than the man described by witnesses and literally look nothing like the images in anything accept that one conspiraloon bulletin which did the rounds. Nor were they anything like him physically, especially Tony Podesta who is heavily built.
It has been debunked many times over by sensible people who weren't wearing tinfoil on their heads
Edited by TheSnitch on Thursday 29th March 17:33
PWeston said:
irocfan said:
PWeston said:
My money is on the Podesta brothers having some involvement - the police sketches are uncanny. Safe to say they will never be pursued though - too well connected and no amount of money will change that.
look up on snopes I had seen their article on the subject - still does not not explain the resemblance! Who is responsible for the e-fits looking like the Podestas? Right down to a mole on Tony's face in the exact correct location FFS!
I am NOT saying this is proof of anything whatsoever, I would just like to know about the e-fits and who made them. Were they having a jape or what?!
The efits were compiled by detectives working for the McCanns with the assistance of two witnesses who saw a man carrying a child on the night in question - they are of the same man.
The Podesta thing is absolute bonkers.
Is this a resemblance?
Or this?
Or how about this?
Aside from the fact that they are both way, way older than the man seen, and look completely different (don't argue) do you really think they took time off from political lobbying at the highest level to pop over to europe and steal a kid?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff