Harry and Meghan

[poo at Paul's]

dobbo_ said:

I'm not implying anything, but you're exhibiting a colossal lack of tact.

To talk about "lack of tact" in respect of this pair of Netflix sponsored, hypocritical, underbus pushing, privileged, ingrates is utterly laughable, and has put every irony meter on the planet, off the scale!

If you remember it, i presuming you're an actual grown adult!! And one who's falling for more utter guff from this pair of attention seeking Doyles. To even try to compare the two incidents is ridiculous based on the end result alone, and of course, there's no proof that the accident in Paris was caused by anything more than a drink driver at grossly excessive speed, and end result exacerbated by lack of seatbelts being worn, less the Dodi and Di gushers forget.
Had it been anyone other than Pricess Di, no one would have given two hoots about it at the time, let alone 25 years later.

Harry is at more risk with yet another 6000 mile return flight going to New York, what is that, btw, 60,000 airmiles he alone has racked up in the last 5 weeks? This is certainly a nice distraction story for those that may otherwise notice his seeming lack of environmental awareness, and will give her a nice opportunity to get on breakfast telly to tell us how "hard" things are, for a few days.

[poo at Paul's]

Anyone know which designer’s panties he shat whilst being followed by some people on bicycles?

[poo at Paul's]

thatsprettyshady said:

That front on shot has shades of 1997

State of Henri, there.

Edited by poo at Paul's on Thursday 18th May 20:21

[poo at Paul's]

bhstewie said:

Perfectly capable of seeing he's a hypocrite in some cases.

But as a general principle just because you're happy to write about some aspects of your life it doesn't automatically mean you're fair game for the press to cover aspects of it that you might consider private and not want making public.

And of course you can have an opinion you've literally just stated one

So, basically, Harry and Meghan can do as they like regarding the info the report or make up about themselves and people surrounding them including family, friends, work colleagues etc, with the main aim of making money, but no one else can.

That sounds fair!

[poo at Paul's]

sugerbear said:

poo at Paul's said:

Oh and as for spending 7 months guest editing one copy of Vogue...…….? ..Just off you vacuous turd

Did you cancel your subscription?

Dazzling retort, truly dazzling.

[poo at Paul's]

Press reporting him out of his depth at the High Court…..he’d be out of his depth in a car park puddle!

[poo at Paul's]

James6112 said:

Evanivitch said:

Wow, the depths the Daily Fail will go to.

Wow, what an attempt at humour. That publication is scum.

It’s a pisstake article, not serious.
One for the professionally offended…

[poo at Paul's]

James6112 said:

Not professionally offended.

Exactly what the professionally offended say!

Lighten up, ffs!

[poo at Paul's]

Are they still being frightful? Not heard much off them, must be away skiing