Reform UK - A symptom of all that is wrong?

Reform UK - A symptom of all that is wrong?

Author
Discussion

Mortarboard

5,867 posts

57 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
crankedup5 said:
Killboy said:
crankedup5 said:
I was interested in your mutterings.
I'm glad. It's a teachable moment.
Then move it along.
Well, he didn't mention the war, at least.
Well, maybe once, but I think he got away with it.



wink



M.

wisbech

3,002 posts

123 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
crankedup5 said:
‘comparatively generous’ to whom and what ? I’m not sure what you are attempting to suggest. Put some. numbers up and demonstrate your point perhaps. And who is ‘her’ ?
And I still haven’t heard or read of pensioners moaning about their pensions.
Didn't WASPI moan about their pensions alot?



JagLover

42,604 posts

237 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Randy Winkman said:
Isn't the issue that some people are thinking about economics (eg during covid) and others about "woke" stuff?
That is likely the case, but the Conservative party historically was not at the forefront of progressive change. There is also no demonstrable "shift to the right" since the idealised days of the nineties. If we take gay rights for example then the modern Conservative party brought in gay marriage and the one that ended in 1997 still had Section 28 in schools. Now I happen to support gay marriage, but just illustrating that "recollections may differ" on changes to the party since 1997.

To take other aspects of social policy as well then the Major government was firm on law and order, and had a "prison works" policy that sharply increased the numbers in prison. Net migration was also low in 1992-1997 ( as it was throughout 1979-97).

The Conservative party has been apparently "lurching to the right" for 25 years but has somehow mysteriously transitioned from a genuinely Conservative party to a Blairite one during the same time frame.

Where some seem to be coming from is the lack of nuance so often seen on the likes of Twitter. You either embrace Critical Race Theory or you are a racist. You must eagerly accept children transitioning or you are a bigot. Etc, and Etc.

chrispmartha

15,601 posts

131 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
crankedup5 said:
TTwiggy said:
crankedup5 said:
No joking involved when the terminology involves Nazi however you want to dress it up or excuse it
Just don’t go there.
Get a grip. This isn’t Germany and we’ve been laughing at Nazis since 1945.
Get a grip! you may have been laughing at the Nazi’s since 1945 but don’t think everybody is as crass as you or the idiot who wanted to pass it off as some sort of light joke. Disgusting from the pair of you.
Interesting. Do you think there should be restrictions on what can be joked about?

The Nazis snd Hitler have been used as references for jokes ever since and indeed during the war.

There was a fairly recent film called Jo Jo Rabbit, don’t watch that if using the Nazis as comedic references offends you. It’s a fabulous film by the way.

Vanden Saab

14,212 posts

76 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Randy Winkman said:
Isn't the issue that some people are thinking about economics (eg during covid) and others about "woke" stuff?
That is likely the case, but the Conservative party historically was not at the forefront of progressive change. There is also no demonstrable "shift to the right" since the idealised days of the nineties. If we take gay rights for example then the modern Conservative party brought in gay marriage and the one that ended in 1997 still had Section 28 in schools. Now I happen to support gay marriage, but just illustrating that "recollections may differ" on changes to the party since 1997.

To take other aspects of social policy as well then the Major government was firm on law and order, and had a "prison works" policy that sharply increased the numbers in prison. Net migration was also low in 1992-1997 ( as it was throughout 1979-97).

The Conservative party has been apparently "lurching to the right" for 25 years but has somehow mysteriously transitioned from a genuinely Conservative party to a Blairite one during the same time frame.

Where some seem to be coming from is the lack of nuance so often seen on the likes of Twitter. You either embrace Critical Race Theory or you are a racist. You must eagerly accept children transitioning or you are a bigot. Etc, and Etc.
You must embrace unfettered illegal immigration or you are Nazi-lite. Don't worry though Labour are going to bring the whole country together and end all the far-right divisiveness. rolleyes

Bill

53,052 posts

257 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
JagLover said:
That is likely the case, but the Conservative party historically was not at the forefront of progressive change. There is also no demonstrable "shift to the right" since the idealised days of the nineties. If we take gay rights for example then the modern Conservative party brought in gay marriage and the one that ended in 1997 still had Section 28 in schools. Now I happen to support gay marriage, but just illustrating that "recollections may differ" on changes to the party since 1997.

To take other aspects of social policy as well then the Major government was firm on law and order, and had a "prison works" policy that sharply increased the numbers in prison. Net migration was also low in 1992-1997 ( as it was throughout 1979-97).

The Conservative party has been apparently "lurching to the right" for 25 years but has somehow mysteriously transitioned from a genuinely Conservative party to a Blairite one during the same time frame.

Where some seem to be coming from is the lack of nuance so often seen on the likes of Twitter. You either embrace Critical Race Theory or you are a racist. You must eagerly accept children transitioning or you are a bigot. Etc, and Etc.
Gay marriage was 10 years (and 4 PMs!!) ago. The talk about immigration, Rwanda etc is there, their incompetence doesn't mean they're cuddly centrists.

President Merkin

3,364 posts

21 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Yep, none of the lurching rightwards I at least refer to took place under Cameron or May. That doesn't mean it hasn't happened, it merely means JL is being highly selective in the timeframe they chose.

Vanden Saab

14,212 posts

76 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
President Merkin said:
Yep, none of the lurching rightwards I at least refer to took place under Cameron or May. That doesn't mean it hasn't happened, it merely means JL is being highly selective in the timeframe they chose.
Are we forgetting T May's 'hostile environment'




Or are we so triggered by Boris we have forgotten?

President Merkin

3,364 posts

21 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
'Triggered' Always the calling card of the reasoned man.

To your credit, at least you aren't trying to disavow the authoritarian reflexes of the Tories, like your predecessor. No, your problem is you want more of it, without bothering to think about the consequences to you.

Dagnir

2,026 posts

165 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
JagLover said:
That is likely the case, but the Conservative party historically was not at the forefront of progressive change. There is also no demonstrable "shift to the right" since the idealised days of the nineties. If we take gay rights for example then the modern Conservative party brought in gay marriage and the one that ended in 1997 still had Section 28 in schools. Now I happen to support gay marriage, but just illustrating that "recollections may differ" on changes to the party since 1997.

To take other aspects of social policy as well then the Major government was firm on law and order, and had a "prison works" policy that sharply increased the numbers in prison. Net migration was also low in 1992-1997 ( as it was throughout 1979-97).

The Conservative party has been apparently "lurching to the right" for 25 years but has somehow mysteriously transitioned from a genuinely Conservative party to a Blairite one during the same time frame.

Where some seem to be coming from is the lack of nuance so often seen on the likes of Twitter. You either embrace Critical Race Theory or you are a racist. You must eagerly accept children transitioning or you are a bigot. Etc, and Etc.
Precisely.

Judge them on their actions. Under this government, we now have a progressive, anti nationalist, hate-speech ridden, open-bordered welfare state that is as soft as I've ever seen it...and yet they're lurching to the right?!


Pull the other one...


If anyone thinks they're 'lurching to the right' because they made some desperate, empty and transparent promises to their right wing base they know they are losing (due to the jump to the left).....then as I said before, you need to get out of your media bubble because you're not living in the real world.






Edited by Dagnir on Wednesday 10th April 08:49

JagLover

42,604 posts

237 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Dagnir said:
If anyone thinks they're 'lurching to the right' because they made some desperate, empty and transparent promises to their right wing base they know they are losing (due to the jump to the left).....then as I said before, you need to get out of your media bubble because you're not living in the real world.
Rwanda is a meaningless charade and they know it. On top of a being an empty gesture to try and limit illegal migration it is also intended to try and move the conversation away from the massive increase in legal migration that was by deliberate design.

crankedup5

9,692 posts

37 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
crankedup5 said:
TTwiggy said:
crankedup5 said:
No joking involved when the terminology involves Nazi however you want to dress it up or excuse it
Just don’t go there.
Get a grip. This isn’t Germany and we’ve been laughing at Nazis since 1945.
Get a grip! you may have been laughing at the Nazi’s since 1945 but don’t think everybody is as crass as you or the idiot who wanted to pass it off as some sort of light joke. Disgusting from the pair of you.
Interesting. Do you think there should be restrictions on what can be joked about?

The Nazis snd Hitler have been used as references for jokes ever since and indeed during the war.

There was a fairly recent film called Jo Jo Rabbit, don’t watch that if using the Nazis as comedic references offends you. It’s a fabulous film by the way.
It’s all about context for me, time and a place included.

Dagnir

2,026 posts

165 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Rwanda is a meaningless charade and they know it. On top of a being an empty gesture to try and limit illegal migration it is also intended to try and move the conversation away from the massive increase in legal migration that was by deliberate design.
Oh of course it is. The exact same play they've made several times before. It's laughably obvious at this stage.


...and yet there's still people on here that insist they are close to being far right etc...


Utterly bonkers.

Castrol for a knave

4,787 posts

93 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
JagLover said:
That is likely the case, but the Conservative party historically was not at the forefront of progressive change. There is also no demonstrable "shift to the right" since the idealised days of the nineties. If we take gay rights for example then the modern Conservative party brought in gay marriage and the one that ended in 1997 still had Section 28 in schools. Now I happen to support gay marriage, but just illustrating that "recollections may differ" on changes to the party since 1997.

To take other aspects of social policy as well then the Major government was firm on law and order, and had a "prison works" policy that sharply increased the numbers in prison. Net migration was also low in 1992-1997 ( as it was throughout 1979-97).

The Conservative party has been apparently "lurching to the right" for 25 years but has somehow mysteriously transitioned from a genuinely Conservative party to a Blairite one during the same time frame.

Where some seem to be coming from is the lack of nuance so often seen on the likes of Twitter. You either embrace Critical Race Theory or you are a racist. You must eagerly accept children transitioning or you are a bigot. Etc, and Etc.
I think you are both right and wrong.

Much of the social liberalism was under Cameron's watch. The cost to him was to allow voices on the right of the party more airspace and ultimately, Brexit ( not to get into a Brexit thread per se).

A look at the gay marriage vote and it is a case of the usual suspects.

Also, bear in mind the first term was a coalition government, the second was when the right wing japery really started....

TTwiggy

11,560 posts

206 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
crankedup5 said:
It’s all about context for me, time and a place included.
So years of prime time tv is ok, a faceless internet forum isn’t?

Oilchange

8,525 posts

262 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
It all seems very convenient and glib to refer to the Tories as Nazis and then laugh it off as if it's nothing.

Not that I'll be voting for the bunch of useless fecks...

TTwiggy

11,560 posts

206 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Oilchange said:
It all seems very convenient and glib to refer to the Tories as Nazis and then laugh it off as if it's nothing.

Not that I'll be voting for the bunch of useless fecks...
It was actually referencing the fact that some people like to claim the Nazis were left wing, because they had ‘socialist’ in their name.

Clearly my humour is too subtle for some.

Oilchange

8,525 posts

262 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Like I said, convenient.

Pan Pan Pan

9,999 posts

113 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Killboy said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
Killboy said:
Pan Pan Pan said:
Exactly, just as we can all laugh at those, who actually believe that labour are the answer to the countries problems.
Is Reform the answer to the country's problems?
I don't think so, Do you?
Not at all. But I'm not advocating for them?
Neither was I, so what was your point?

Killboy

7,551 posts

204 months

Wednesday 10th April
quotequote all
Pan Pan Pan said:
Neither was I, so what was your point?
No, just the anti-labour whine as usual. music