CV19 - Cure worse than the disease? (Vol 13)

CV19 - Cure worse than the disease? (Vol 13)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

RSTurboPaul

10,514 posts

259 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Alucidnation said:
Hes A Menthol said:
johnboy1975 said:
APontus said:
Hes A Menthol said:
Maybe it is the sterilisation they are going for?


Loads of fertility clinics saying that the eggs and sperm from the vaccinated are pretty much dead.
You really shouldn't be posting comments like that without some kind of evidence. I'm no fan of this vaccination programme, but these kind of comments make it very difficult for reasonable questioning to get traction.
I find that hard to believe. Reputable link?
I will dig out the links tomorrow.

Sorry, thought this was pretty much common knowledge. It is something all of them have been discussing in great depth, Dr. Robert Malone etc.

I think it was Bret Weinstein's Podcast, also on Youtube, where they discussed it in depth.



I'm not home tonight and the links are on my macbook.
Here you go..

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-sperm-va...
Are they the same 'fact checkers' that said the possible lab leak in Wuhan was a 'conspiracy theory'? wink

Nickgnome

8,277 posts

90 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
Nickgnome said:
When our records are fully accessible true needs will be understood and services tailored to suit. Resistance against this will result in ongoing inadequate care for those that do not have private funding.
What makes you think that those with private funding will be able to afford insurance and/or treatment once insurance companies and healthcare providers are able to determine in advance your likelihood of genetic-based illness/susceptibility?

Wonky gene that might cause cancer?

No cancer cover for you.
I am fine I can assure you.

i do not live in your strange little world.

Maybe Darwinism will finally come to fruition.

smashing

1,613 posts

162 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Nickgnome said:
jagnet said:
Nickgnome said:
Why do you need F2F all the time. it's just an old fashioned approach. We have moved on.

As long as you can adequately describe your symptoms.
Fascinating. In that case perhaps then you'd like to explain how my doctor managed to confuse encephalitis with a respiratory illness in a telephone consultation, despite describing my symptoms accurately

Fortunately I ignored the doctor's suggestion to isolate and order a covid test and paid for a blood test privately.

In person appointments are so important. Many people have gone to the doctors for one issue only to have the doctor spot something else of concern at the same time. That just won't happen via the phone, leading to many more illnesses being missed early.
So you spoke to your GP and you described your symptoms accurately then just maybe your GP is not good. Maybe via a 111 service the correct person could have been appointed in your direction and a F2F organised efficiently.

Old fashioned prejudice is difficult for some.

The spot other stuff is a completely different issue and should be dealt with via an annual health check as a minimum. That however is a different discussion.

When our records are fully accessible true needs will be understood and services tailored to suit. Resistance against this will result in ongoing inadequate care for those that do not have private funding.
rolleyes

RSTurboPaul

10,514 posts

259 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Elysium said:
So what's the catch?

Is the vaccine passport rollout revealed on page 2?

rolleyes

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

171 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
Elysium said:
So what's the catch?

Is the vaccine passport rollout revealed on page 2?

rolleyes
Turn the page and you'll find out!

RSTurboPaul

10,514 posts

259 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Nickgnome said:
RSTurboPaul said:
Nickgnome said:
When our records are fully accessible true needs will be understood and services tailored to suit. Resistance against this will result in ongoing inadequate care for those that do not have private funding.
What makes you think that those with private funding will be able to afford insurance and/or treatment once insurance companies and healthcare providers are able to determine in advance your likelihood of genetic-based illness/susceptibility?

Wonky gene that might cause cancer?

No cancer cover for you.
I am fine I can assure you.

i do not live in your strange little world.

Maybe Darwinism will finally come to fruition.
I didn't ask if you were fine?

For the record, I don't care.

dmahon

2,717 posts

65 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Elysium said:
Not a chance in hell they will let face masks go. Don’t believe it for a second.

Boringvolvodriver

9,021 posts

44 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
dmahon said:
MEC said:
Deaf as in hard of hearing (enough to struggle on a phone).

Old as in no internet/smart phone?


An awful lot I should imagine.
Give up. Nickgnome cannot comprehend anyone with a less than perfect life.
Correct - I knew I shouldn’t have responded this time!


RSTurboPaul

10,514 posts

259 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Alucidnation said:
RSTurboPaul said:
Elysium said:
So what's the catch?

Is the vaccine passport rollout revealed on page 2?

rolleyes
Turn the page and you'll find out!
That's a bit hard when they've only revealed the front pages so far wink

RSTurboPaul

10,514 posts

259 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Harrison Bergeron said:
But we've still got to jab all the young people though. You know , pure statistics.

Speaking of statistics here's a nice one from Ian on twitter.
That second link is deserving of a proper picture post smile


77th Brigade

1,071 posts

38 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
Are they the same 'fact checkers' that said the possible lab leak in Wuhan was a 'conspiracy theory'? wink
Without broaching the fertility/infertility issue, I'll wager that the so-called "fact checkers" are now one of the most distrusted facets of the modern media. A cursory glance at their financiers is the magnificent giveaway.

scenario8

6,585 posts

180 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Elysium said:
Remarkable lead story / lead picture choices there.

Alucidnation

16,810 posts

171 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
Alucidnation said:
Hes A Menthol said:
johnboy1975 said:
APontus said:
Hes A Menthol said:
Maybe it is the sterilisation they are going for?


Loads of fertility clinics saying that the eggs and sperm from the vaccinated are pretty much dead.
You really shouldn't be posting comments like that without some kind of evidence. I'm no fan of this vaccination programme, but these kind of comments make it very difficult for reasonable questioning to get traction.
I find that hard to believe. Reputable link?
I will dig out the links tomorrow.

Sorry, thought this was pretty much common knowledge. It is something all of them have been discussing in great depth, Dr. Robert Malone etc.

I think it was Bret Weinstein's Podcast, also on Youtube, where they discussed it in depth.



I'm not home tonight and the links are on my macbook.
Here you go..

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-sperm-va...
Are they the same 'fact checkers' that said the possible lab leak in Wuhan was a 'conspiracy theory'? wink
Doesn’t matter really as another poster has also put up some links to confirm that the cv vaccine is fertility killing is bullst.

Nickgnome

8,277 posts

90 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
I didn't ask if you were fine?

For the record, I don't care.
Best way to be.

There are over 7billion on the planet and i decided years ago my emotional involvement is limited to my family and friends. A few hundred.

Everyone on here and everywhere else are of no consequence whatsoever and for them I feel nothing good or bad.

Why would anyone want to pretend to carry that burden?









rxtx

6,016 posts

211 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Hes A Menthol said:
I will dig out the links tomorrow.

Sorry, thought this was pretty much common knowledge. It is something all of them have been discussing in great depth, Dr. Robert Malone etc.

I think it was Bret Weinstein's Podcast, also on Youtube, where they discussed it in depth.



I'm not home tonight and the links are on my macbook.
You're a complete lunatic.

RSTurboPaul

10,514 posts

259 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Nickgnome said:
RSTurboPaul said:
I didn't ask if you were fine?

For the record, I don't care.
Best way to be.

There are over 7billion on the planet and i decided years ago my emotional involvement is limited to my family and friends. A few hundred.

Everyone on here and everywhere else are of no consequence whatsoever and for them I feel nothing good or bad.

Why would anyone want to pretend to carry that burden?
This post explains a lot.


LOL at 'a few hundred friends'.

Facebook contacts don't count.

Rollin

6,121 posts

246 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
77th Brigade said:
RSTurboPaul said:
Are they the same 'fact checkers' that said the possible lab leak in Wuhan was a 'conspiracy theory'? wink
Without broaching the fertility/infertility issue, I'll wager that the so-called "fact checkers" are now one of the most distrusted facets of the modern media. A cursory glance at their financiers is the magnificent giveaway.
Happy to trust random videos by crackpots on twitter though aren't you?



RSTurboPaul

10,514 posts

259 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Interesting read on the Israel Green Pass, with links to the Legal challenges it's faced:

https://lexatlas-c19.org/israel-is-the-green-pass-...

MaxFromage

1,913 posts

132 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Interesting discussion on 'deleted' sequencing:

https://twitter.com/jbloom_lab/status/140744560402...

And if you're not sure what it all means biggrin

https://twitter.com/BallouxFrancois/status/1407449...

Hes A Menthol

43 posts

35 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
johnboy1975 said:
Thanks. I'm new(ish) to BW, after seeing him being interviewed by Triggernometry. I'll hunt it down

It is such an easy test to do. Measure 1000 sperm / egg counts. Vaccinate. Remeasure over a period of months.

Are you saying this has been done, its common knowledge, yet no MSM outlet is running the story?
Far from the MSM discussing it.

There was a zoom call video posted where people from different fertility clinics were discussing it.
Saying the sperm and eggs after vaccination were virtually dead and was a real concern if it was a short term thing or long term.
Never thought anything more about it, but then a couple of discussions on videos later discussed it further. They were talking about the spike protein was found heavily in the ovaries and was a real concern. The fertility thing has been one of the main areas of concern throughout this and has been discussed as much as Myocarditis from the poeple I have been following.
That was as much as I remembered though, I'm sure I saved the bookmarks.

There was really very little about at the time.
It now seems though now when you search there are hundreds and hundreds of links, all over google, all from official health care services and the NHS etc. etc.
On Twitter I counted 50 articles in the last 12 hours alone posted telling people not to worry about fertility.
Not only does the vaccine not cause infertility issues, it seems it actually increases fertility. Phew!
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED