Your voting intentions
Poll: Your voting intentions
Total Members Polled: 1195
Discussion
Kermit power said:
If nothing else, the Returning Officer will give it all due consideration!![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
I can certainly see the value in that ![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
Timothy Bucktu said:
Well, yeah...Nothing will come of it I'm sure.
But if non of the parties are worthy of your vote, at least it shows the people who fought for that vote that you recognise their achievement by being bothered to at least turn up to the ballot box.
A spoilt vote is still a vote and counted as such.
You vote for who you want. I'm effectively going to vote 'why did he spoil his vote'.
I guess turning up without an ID is also counted...but that's more of a 'dumb ass' vote.
Thanks for the reply But if non of the parties are worthy of your vote, at least it shows the people who fought for that vote that you recognise their achievement by being bothered to at least turn up to the ballot box.
A spoilt vote is still a vote and counted as such.
You vote for who you want. I'm effectively going to vote 'why did he spoil his vote'.
I guess turning up without an ID is also counted...but that's more of a 'dumb ass' vote.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
wc98 said:
Tom8 said:
Evercross said:
Tom8 said:
The only lib dem of any gravitas was Charles Kennedy. And he was a massive alcoholic.
A recovering one (with the help of fellow addict Alastair Campbell), until the death of his father plunged him back into depression which was then exploited by Ian Blackford and his campaign group in 2015.What that fat b
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
As soon as Blackford launched the ‘Where’s Charlie?’ slogan, I wrote that it seemed ‘a clear attempt to personalise the contest on grounds which are undesirable and unnecessary. Mr Kennedy’s fragility is scarcely a state secret. On top of that, he is coping with a string of tragedies and losses.’
In response to the whistle, Blackford’s rottweilers were out the traps. One of his closest associates, Brian Smith, convener of the SNP’s Skye branch, wondered online if Charles, ‘has “a problem” that stops you going to Westminster?’ Up to election day, Smith bombarded Charles’s social media sites with abuse, describing him as ‘our own arch-Quisling’.
Smith was soon one among many Cybernats. One of Charles’s constituency staff had to work full-time on deleting social media abuse. There were vile anonymous messages attached to Charles’s car and pushed through his letter-box. When he returned home after the confirmation of his defeat, the bins had been emptied across his driveway. The level of sheer cruelty was beyond comprehension – and all totally unnecessary in terms of the election’s outcome.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/ian-blackford-...
Worth reading the whole article. The nickname of Scottish Nasty Party is apt in this case.
Tankrizzo said:
How over 140 of you (at current count) still think the Tories are worth your vote, god only knows.
As I've said previously, it's the "least worst" option for many of us. Not a great state of affairs, but I'd rather vote for my collie than risk letting the SNP win in my constituency.
Slowboathome said:
Tankrizzo said:
How over 140 of you (at current count) still think the Tories are worth your vote, god only knows. And this is from a long-term Tory voter who will be sitting this one out for the first time ever.
Lots of people vote based on the calibre of their local candidates.S600BSB said:
Slowboathome said:
Tankrizzo said:
How over 140 of you (at current count) still think the Tories are worth your vote, god only knows. And this is from a long-term Tory voter who will be sitting this one out for the first time ever.
Lots of people vote based on the calibre of their local candidates.Rocket. said:
Like a Labrador returning to eat it's own vomit I shall be voting Conservative.
Catchy. You should write in to CCHQ with that one. They'll have it emblazoned down the side of a battle bus in no time.Maybe even develop it into a set of themed messages...
e.g. "If you enjoy rolling in fox-s
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
bloomen said:
Roderick Spode said:
Westminster is too constrained… Once you get out of Westminster, whether it’s Davos or anywhere else, you actually engage with people that you can see working with in the future. Westminster is just a tribal shouting place.
Still waiting to hear what the actual question was. Interview by Emily Maitlis and Jon Sopel with Sir Keir Starmer in Davos recorded circa 21st January 2023 said:
Maitlis: So, let’s just ask you quickly. You have to choose between Davos and Westminster.
Starmer: (Without hesitation) Davos.
Maitlis: Why?
Starmer: Because Westminster is too constrained, it’s closed, and we’re not having meaning . . . you actually engage with people who you can see working with in the future . . . Westminster is just a tribal shouting place”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDVXMhhsXloStarmer: (Without hesitation) Davos.
Maitlis: Why?
Starmer: Because Westminster is too constrained, it’s closed, and we’re not having meaning . . . you actually engage with people who you can see working with in the future . . . Westminster is just a tribal shouting place”.
Tom8 said:
B'stard Child said:
Pitre said:
My MP is Liz Truss with a big majority. Suggestions as to what I should be doing on July 4th welcomed...
Mine too - cock and balls or vote for a candidate with hope that they can beat herCock and balls then
Tom8 said:
B'stard Child said:
Pitre said:
My MP is Liz Truss with a big majority. Suggestions as to what I should be doing on July 4th welcomed...
Mine too - cock and balls or vote for a candidate with hope that they can beat herCock and balls then
EmBe said:
snuffy said:
dandarez said:
Because spoilt ballot papers are 'counted'.
Counted.Ignored.
Destroyed (like every other ballot paper).
Pointless.
Pointless.
I will not, however, be drawing a cock and b
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff