New Moon Mission

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,276 posts

267 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
So do I frown

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,276 posts

267 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Live Press Conference on now.

Oily Nails

2,932 posts

202 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
I'm sorry to wheel out the old stereotype....

But their american, they always miss when bombing something....



Has anyone checked for a hole just east of Reading?

grumbledoak

31,591 posts

235 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Oily Nails said:
Has anyone checked for a hole just east of Reading?
Bracknell? hehe

Oily Nails

2,932 posts

202 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
Oily Nails said:
Has anyone checked for a hole just east of Reading?
Bracknell? hehe
Maybe..but then again one hole looks much the same as another, and we do have an awful lot of them in this country

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,276 posts

267 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
cottonfoo said:
Eric Mc said:
I reckon the plume didn't rise high enough for it to be lit by the sun.

By the time it reached sunlight, the camera carrying craft had already impacted. I think we will need to see the results from the ground based telescopes (and Hubble too).
Doubt Hubble will have a wide enough view to be useful.
Press Conference confirms that Hubble was indeed used today.

grumbledoak

31,591 posts

235 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
So, a concerted effort to make this sound like a success, but without the 'plume' they can't yet be sure that the data they have will tell them anything...

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

257 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Did they hit Lord Lucan....?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,276 posts

267 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
So, a concerted effort to make this sound like a success, but without the 'plume' they can't yet be sure that the data they have will tell them anything...
That about sums it up. It will probably take a few days at least before they will be able to say for certain whether they will get anything useable.

I would expect that they were fooled into expecting spectacular images by assuming the result would be similar to the ones received from the Deep Impact comet probe of a few years ago.
It looks to me that the moon is very different to a comet -

its surface material is different
its gravity is higher
and I am pretty sure that the impact velocity of around 5,000 mph was quite a bit less than Deep Impact's so therefore the kinetic energy released would have been a lot less.

Jonny671

29,405 posts

191 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Quote from LCROSS Wiki;

Wikipedia said:
Public reaction in response to the impact was stated to be "puzzled", as the impact was not visually prominent; project manager Dan Andrews believed that this was due to pre-crash simulations that exaggerated the plume's prominence (some simulations were not done by NASA). Another possibility was that lighting was not sufficient, and would result in the need for image processing to increase clarity.

GetCarter

29,437 posts

281 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
I just made this: http://www.xtranormal.com/watch?e=2009100911163185...

WARNING - VERY BAD LANGUAGE

(I know, I should get out more).

Edited by GetCarter on Friday 9th October 16:24

grumbledoak

31,591 posts

235 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
rofl Well done.

Balmoral Green

41,087 posts

250 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
spitfire-ian said:
Just had a rather interesting rolleyes conversation with a couple of people at work about todays events.

They had read in the Daily Star that NASA were going to "bomb the moon" which then lead to comments like...

"What happens if they knock it out of orbit?"

"They don't know what's inside the moon so what happens if it starts a chain of events which make the thing explode?"

"Who knows what viruses they might disturb and send back here"

"What are they doing nuking the moon for? Surely that will just annoy Iran and we'll all get nuked"

"The NASA scientists know nothing about bombs so how do they know it will work correctly?"



They didn't appreciate my laughter hehe
Similarly, on BBC Breakfast, they were interviewing an astronomer about this, and one of the questions they asked was that viewers had contacted the BBC worried about the risks in case it had an effect on us here on earth.

Stupid people are everywhere.

And I do mean stupid, rather than just ignorant/uninformed.

Edited by Balmoral Green on Friday 9th October 18:22

Oakey

27,619 posts

218 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
spitfire-ian said:
Just had a rather interesting rolleyes conversation with a couple of people at work about todays events.

They had read in the Daily Star that NASA were going to "bomb the moon" which then lead to comments like...

"What happens if they knock it out of orbit?"

"They don't know what's inside the moon so what happens if it starts a chain of events which make the thing explode?"

"Who knows what viruses they might disturb and send back here"

"What are they doing nuking the moon for? Surely that will just annoy Iran and we'll all get nuked"

"The NASA scientists know nothing about bombs so how do they know it will work correctly?"



They didn't appreciate my laughter hehe
Similarly, on BBC Breakfast, they were interviewing an astronomer about this, and one of the questions they asked was that viewers had contacted the BBC worried about the risks in case it had an effect on us here on earth.

Stupid people are everywhere.

And I do mean stupid, rather than just ignorant/uninformed.

Edited by Balmoral Green on Friday 9th October 18:22
Where, exactly, do these retards think that the whopping huge craters littered all over the moon came from? Or do they honestly believe it's made of cheese and a cheeky mouse has nibbled those holes through it?

Balmoral Green

41,087 posts

250 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Space 1999, what if it comes true? yikes

turbobloke

104,403 posts

262 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
Space 1999, what if it comes true? yikes
Fair point.



eek

If UFO came true, we'd get lots of attractive and curvy posh totty with purple hair, wearing shiny figure hugging outfits.



lick

Dr.Doofenshmirtz

15,334 posts

202 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
I just made this: http://www.xtranormal.com/watch?e=2009100911163185...

WARNING - VERY BAD LANGUAGE

(I know, I should get out more).
Excellent laugh

johnfm

13,668 posts

252 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
The Excession said:
Hmmmm.... didn't see much.... guess it must've burnt up during entry
you're kidding, right?

What would cause them to burn up on entry? There's no atmosphere is there?

The Excession

11,669 posts

252 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
johnfm said:
The Excession said:
Hmmmm.... didn't see much.... guess it must've burnt up during entry
you're kidding, right?

What would cause them to burn up on entry? There's no atmosphere is there?
Not kidding... nope... for real... for sure I was ringing up the BBC this morning getting them to phone NASA to call it off. I am certain it has knocked the moon out of whack and next month the moon will fall out of the sky and kill us all.

As for craters on the moon... it was the moon mice what did it. oh yes

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,276 posts

267 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
The moon was interesting for ALL sorts of reasons in teh 1960s.

Gabrielle Drake - nice.