whats everyones thoughts on this clown.

whats everyones thoughts on this clown.

Author
Discussion

Oakey

27,621 posts

218 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
cossy400 said:
OT OH!!!! Big Dave going get you! eek
His name is Purple Aki

Lord Flathead

1,288 posts

181 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
What would happen if they had let him off? Everyone would abuse the legal system and that's not about to happen.

dandarez

13,334 posts

285 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Contempt of court seems to be viewed more serious than sticking a knife in someone!

Mind you, having done my fair share of Jury service I'd say that it's almost like having a sentence anyway.

And as for this idiot causing a lost day of the trial, one trial (really serious crime) I attended, we (Jurors) were sent home 3 or 4 times over the trial period because the ruddy defendant decided he was peed off so didn't turn up on several occasions!
Did he get any extra punishment for that? Of course not. He did go down though!

dandarez

13,334 posts

285 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Lord Flathead said:
What would happen if they had let him off? Everyone would abuse the legal system and that's not about to happen.
True. But it sure as hell makes the justice system look like it stinks when he gets this, and yet regularly we hear that 'real' crims get let off. No consistency whatsoever.

paddyhasneeds

52,336 posts

212 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I have mixed views. Prick? Yes. However, he's going to get at least some time behind bars, and he's going to get a criminal record for something which was stupid and misguided but I'd struggle a little to call "criminal", I'd class it more as disrespectful, arrogant and so on.

Maybe I'm going a bit soft but I do wonder how many people walked out of the court on that day who had genuinely caused physical or other stress and suffering to real victims, and to me that does make it seem just a little bit wrong.

Mr. Potato Head

1,151 posts

221 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
What a fool. He'd have been in a better position now committing aggravated burglary of an 80 year old widow and stealing a few cars.

TTwiggy

11,574 posts

206 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Courts expect the plebs to toe the line.

This is why, rightly or wrongly, charges such as perjury, perverting the course of justice or contempt will see you sent down, while your fifth charge that week for burglary sees you walk.

EarlOfHazard

3,610 posts

160 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Mr. Potato Head said:
What a fool. He'd have been in a better position now committing aggravated burglary of an 80 year old widow and stealing a few cars.
This.

Tunku

7,703 posts

230 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Do not take the piss out of the establishment. Serves the little chutney ferret right.

The Rustman

225 posts

171 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
It serves him right for sure..... his mum and dad say he's a good boy , and that's exactly why he's doing time.

You may not like what goes on in the justice system but its this kind off thing that's sending us down the toilet

StottyZr

6,860 posts

165 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
100 hours community service would have been fitting. I can go punch your grandmother square in the face right now, and I won't get jail time.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
StottyZr said:
100 hours community service would have been fitting. I can go punch your grandmother square in the face right now, and I won't get jail time.
You'd have to dig her up first: might get time for that.

Oldred_V8S

3,719 posts

240 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
She said "It's ludicrous. I do not understand what the judge was trying to achieve by putting him behind bars," whilst deploring the fact that her son now has a criminal record.

Perhaps trying to stop other tts like her son from wasting public time and money.

He took the risk and got found out; the courts were never going to pat him on the head and say "never mind, we hope the show was good."Got what he deserved in my book!

DSM2

3,624 posts

202 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
Oldred_V8S said:
She said "It's ludicrous. I do not understand what the judge was trying to achieve by putting him behind bars," whilst deploring the fact that her son now has a criminal record.

Perhaps trying to stop other tts like her son from wasting public time and money.

He took the risk and got found out; the courts were never going to pat him on the head and say "never mind, we hope the show was good."Got what he deserved in my book!
The judge wasted more time and public money than the kid did.

Typical overreaction from the judiciary who can't face the fact that most of the population have nothing but contempt for them, so they 'make examples' where ever they can.

The boy was a tit but the judge? Unbelievable.

And god knows which member of the asylum thought it a good idea to have 18 year olds on juries in the first place......


silvagod

1,053 posts

162 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
He's out now, served 4 days. What was the point in that??

Digger

14,799 posts

193 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
DSM2 said:
And god knows which member of the asylum thought it a good idea to have 18 year olds on juries in the first place......
Agreed

It's harsh. If someone asked me what the minimum age requirement is for Jury Duty I would NEVER have guessed teenagers were in the mix. Not condoning it, just think the age limit should be raised?

Edited by Digger on Friday 23 December 15:13

Pesty

42,655 posts

258 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
Oldred_V8S said:
Perhaps trying to stop other tts like her son from wasting public time and money.
fk public time and money I'm more concerned about victims.

Usually when somebody is in court there is a victim hoping for justice (yes I know if guilty etc etc) its them that dont need messing about by pricks like this thunder.

Mojooo

12,834 posts

182 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
he seemed quite humble on the BBC website tbh.

RYH64E

7,960 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
silvagod said:
He's out now, served 4 days. What was the point in that??
The story has been widely reported in the media, maybe anyone reading it will realise that messing with the courts is a bad idea. More sentences like this would be a good deterrent imo, it can't have been a pleasant experience.

stuttgartmetal

8,111 posts

218 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
The court, especially the Judge, will not condone for one millisecond being lied to.
The Law is the Law.
Truth will always prevail.
Its what our democracy and way of life stand on.
Its very very serious to lie to the court.
To commit perjury.
Or to conspire to commit perjury.
The court always finds out.
I think Perjury is seven years nowadays.

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manu...

Factors to be considered include:

-the number of offences whether planned or spontaneous whether they were persisted in
-whether the lies told or fabrications embarked upon had any actual impact on the proceedings in question;
-whether the activities of the offender drew in others
-the relationship between others drawn in and the offender
-the whole course of conduct