Ruke Em from Robit!

Author
Discussion

EDLT

15,421 posts

208 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
Seight_Returns said:
Yeah that'll be why the US has stood by and done nothing whilst Pyongyang has continually thumbed their nose at them whilst developing an ICBM and nuclear weapons capability with help from their mates in Tehran.
They haven't done either of those things as far as I can tell.

Seight_Returns

1,640 posts

203 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
EDLT said:
They haven't done either of those things as far as I can tell.
I said "developing" not "developed" capability.

Their recent satellite launch and underground nuclear explosion make both their intent and developing capability in both areas quite obvious.

Art0ir

9,402 posts

172 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all

NWTony

2,856 posts

230 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
Is anyone else reading the thread title in a scooby doo voice?

PumpkinSteve

4,109 posts

158 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
Things like this honestly frighten me.

ZR1cliff

17,999 posts

251 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
Silverbullet767 said:
If they can get a missile, with a nuclear warhead on it, pointed in the right direction without it coming straight back down and nuking themselves. I'd be surprised.
Haha, that would be one hell of a fail.


scarble

5,277 posts

159 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
NWTony said:
Is anyone else reading the thread title in a scooby doo voice?
ru-huh
Odie said:
isnt it 'rwahbit'
should I be vewy vewy quiet?

On a srs note I thought with the inauguration of the lovabley podgy little K-J-U with his love of basketball despite being small heralded a new era for Best-Korea politics, a coming-in-from-the-cold so to speak, unfortunately it turns out he is also an angrylittleman.

I think mutually assured destruction is suddenly making a lot of sense, even if they get nukes it's unlikely they're stupid enough to use them, all bark etc.

Art0ir

9,402 posts

172 months

Friday 8th March 2013
quotequote all
scarble said:
should I be vewy vewy quiet?

On a srs note I thought with the inauguration of the lovabley podgy little K-J-U with his love of basketball despite being small heralded a new era for Best-Korea politics, a coming-in-from-the-cold so to speak, unfortunately it turns out he is also an angrylittleman.

I think mutually assured destruction is suddenly making a lot of sense, even if they get nukes it's unlikely they're stupid enough to use them, all bark etc.
His regime can't survive without his population living in constant fear of war.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

257 months

Sunday 10th March 2013
quotequote all
Four Litre said:
singlecoil said:
Does 'robit' need to be pronounced in the oriental style to make sense?
ohh jeez
Understatement of the week...

Who's a sirry irriot?...rofl

JDRoest

1,126 posts

152 months

Sunday 10th March 2013
quotequote all
Seight_Returns said:
Yeah that'll be why the US has stood by and done nothing whilst Pyongyang has continually thumbed their nose at them whilst developing an ICBM and nuclear weapons capability with help from their mates in Tehran.
You need to read up on what the Americans have been developing.

And please, enough with the Iran techno heroes. How is F14 development going these days? Gees.

Lets not even go down the Iraq/Afghan discussion as they are fighting terrorists at the end of the day, not sovereign forces. Since Vietnam, every sovereign force that's stood in the way of the military has been despatched pretty quickly.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

286 months

Sunday 10th March 2013
quotequote all
Can you fit one in a shipping container?

Anyway. Some good old fashioned rhetoric.
http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2013/201303/news08/2013...

From here
http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-e.htm

Looks like Kim was watching some archery, DPRK women lead a worthwhile life being told what to do and they are going to kick the west's butt.

Thundersports

659 posts

147 months

Sunday 10th March 2013
quotequote all
I wondered about the container or Lorry scenario. Is that not a more realistic option for them?

Seight_Returns

1,640 posts

203 months

Monday 11th March 2013
quotequote all
JDRoest said:
Lets not even go down the Iraq/Afghan discussion as they are fighting terrorists at the end of the day, not sovereign forces. Since Vietnam, every sovereign force that's stood in the way of the military has been despatched pretty quickly.
Let's just hope that this plan for sorting out NK doesn't have any implicit assumptions that the enemy fights the way they want them to fight then.

So apart from Iraq and Afghanistan - which are these sovereign forces that have gone head to head against the US in a full on war and been "despatched pretty quickly" over the last 40 years ? Somalia perhaps - yeah, that ended really well too.

The superiority of US military technology isn't in question. But rolling out the shiney toys for 2 weeks shock and awe resulting in the capitulation of the sovereign government - after which the enemy retreats to the hills and regroups as "terrorists" and proceeds to conduct a successful guerilla campaign using 19th Century technology until the US gives up and goes home isn't victory.

It will be so in NK as well unless the US commits to a WW2 style ground war with associated casualty levels, which the US electorate doesn't have the stomach for - or uses the threatened or actual nuclear option, which due to the close proximity of their ally and protectorate SK, and of course to China, isn't an option.

Edited by Seight_Returns on Monday 11th March 13:52

vescaegg

25,854 posts

169 months

Monday 11th March 2013
quotequote all
Seight_Returns said:
It will be so in NK as well unless the US commits to a WW2 style ground war with associated casualty levels, which the US electorate doesn't have the stomach for - or uses the threatened or actual nuclear option, which due to the close proximity of their ally and protectorate SK, and of course to China, isn't an option.

Edited by Seight_Returns on Monday 11th March 13:52
Id hazard a guess that the US could obliterate every strategic NK base / milirary asset / missle silo without a moments notice with non-nuclear weaponry. I bet it wouldnt take more than a few days to cripple their miliary from the air without risking any life on their own side...

Negative Creep

25,041 posts

229 months

Monday 11th March 2013
quotequote all
elster said:
sneijder said:
They are claiming "The United States is about to ignite a nuclear war ....."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3nhm1Zw2eY

I'd love them to come up with evidence of a direct threat on such a scale


The resolution today mentioned individuals who are subject to a travel ban and a freeze on assets, there must be some proper deals going on, what would they have been selling ?

http://usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/205698.h...

Utterly bonkers.
Evidence, they sent Dennis Rodman.

How can that not be construed as an act of war?!
Clearly he's been sent in as a covert agent. Have you never watched Double Team?