JFK - The political reasons for assassination

JFK - The political reasons for assassination

Author
Discussion

Mortarboard

5,886 posts

57 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
So, assuming the CIA cabal was a real thing, was Oswald in on it, and if so, what was he gaining? Apart from worldwide fame and the electric chair.
There's so many oddities with Oswald (not least the boomerang citizenship/passport)
And taken out in days by Jack ruby, after the fact. Convenient.

M.

Electro1980

8,439 posts

141 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
And the NP&E shark has been well and truly jumped.

Bo_apex

2,602 posts

220 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
Electro1980 said:
And the NP&E shark has been well and truly jumped.
biggrin


Nevertheless, it was the Mob sub-contracting to CIA

A500leroy

5,179 posts

120 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
And isnt it odd it was all filmed? Whats the chances of that exact spot being filmed in early 60s America? Were other visits by JFK filmed to that extent?

Bigends

5,445 posts

130 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
A500leroy said:
And isnt it odd it was all filmed? Whats the chances of that exact spot being filmed in early 60s America? Were other visits by JFK filmed to that extent?
It was filmed by chance by the one cameraman. There was an interesting documentary on Mr Zapruder the other night.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37eu9Txjz0I

Edited by Bigends on Tuesday 21st November 16:39

Jordie Barretts sock

Original Poster:

4,804 posts

21 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
Electro1980 said:
And the NP&E shark has been well and truly jumped.
Please explain? This isn't Happy Days! biggrin


rdjohn

6,238 posts

197 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
In 1991 Oliver Stone explained the conspiracy in perfect detail. Unfortunately, where there were gaps he created characters to fill them in. However you are left with the conclusion that the Pentagon and its Contractors had most to lose and the ability to put it all together.

So yes, Oswald was the Patsy, the Warren Commission was a joke, Jim Garrison was right all along and the Govt did everything in its power to cover his attempts at exposing the conspiracy.. The so-called Magic Bullet theory is trashed as is Oswald's ability to fire 4 accurate shots in 2.5s, conveniently leave his rifle in the book depository and get himself arrested and killed by the time LBJ had been sworn in.

It is available on Netflix and is convincing with its detail. But you need to make your own mind up.

speedchick

5,186 posts

224 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
There was a programe a couple of years back and it was revealed that was fatal shot was an accidental shot from one of the Secret Service guys, apparently it happened in all the confusion.
I recall it put paid to all the conspiracy theories and magic bulleys. Or did I dream watching it?

julianm

1,550 posts

203 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
I also remember the 'shot from the front seat' analysis & it did seem to make a lot of sense.
I once had a full copy of the Warren report picked up in an old bookshop - online these days - https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commi...

Edited by julianm on Tuesday 21st November 19:10

RB Will

9,678 posts

242 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
This is a decent roundup of the situation

https://youtu.be/1Ltg2RgHlsQ?si=cG33fRIcRYlqvBXr

Ridgemont

6,632 posts

133 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
speedchick said:
There was a programe a couple of years back and it was revealed that was fatal shot was an accidental shot from one of the Secret Service guys, apparently it happened in all the confusion.
I recall it put paid to all the conspiracy theories and magic bulleys. Or did I dream watching it?
Ha. No I remember that: it turns out the security detail had been out on the lash the night before and a camera analysis suggested that yes, Kennedy had received a likely shot from an hungover secret service agent in the chaos.

That said I may have missed the thing about the headshot: that didn’t look like the kind of damage a side arm from secret service would be able to do.

julianm

1,550 posts

203 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
I think the secret service guy had a rifle.

Some grim reading in the Warren Report about tests carried out on gelatin filled skulls, some of which may have convinced the enquiry that Oswald's gun could have been responsible.

speedchick

5,186 posts

224 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
Yea I remember a rifle being mentioned.
Thanks for confirming I did actually see it!

Wills2

23,194 posts

177 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
In 1991 Oliver Stone explained the conspiracy in perfect detail. Unfortunately, where there were gaps he created characters to fill them in. However you are left with the conclusion that the Pentagon and its Contractors had most to lose and the ability to put it all together.

So yes, Oswald was the Patsy, the Warren Commission was a joke, Jim Garrison was right all along and the Govt did everything in its power to cover his attempts at exposing the conspiracy.. The so-called Magic Bullet theory is trashed as is Oswald's ability to fire 4 accurate shots in 2.5s, conveniently leave his rifle in the book depository and get himself arrested and killed by the time LBJ had been sworn in.

It is available on Netflix and is convincing with its detail. But you need to make your own mind up.
He (Stone) goes into further detail in his 2021 film JFK revisited as many of the classified docs had been released after public pressure, for me there was definitely a cover up.



Stick Legs

5,108 posts

167 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
After the first shot a Secret Service body guard turned around to see what happened. The car hit a pot hole.


rdjohn

6,238 posts

197 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
He (Stone) goes into further detail in his 2021 film JFK revisited as many of the classified docs had been released after public pressure, for me there was definitely a cover up.

Perhaps that is what I saw on Netflix in September this year as it does mention those documents. It is a powerful film, that I want to, instinctively, not believe. However, on the balance of probabilities, it seems believable.

The whole Oswald and Ruby thing just looks like a fairy tail. There had to be more than one shooter position sufficiently close to the target, that could fire the volley almost simultaneously. No marksman with a Sniper rifle could achieve what Oswald was claimed to have achieved from his compromised position in the book repository.

nikaiyo2

4,792 posts

197 months

Tuesday 21st November 2023
quotequote all
I think the argument that JFK was a mob assassination are more convincing than CIA/ FBI. I also think if it was “establishment” someone would have talked by now, deathbed confessions etc etc.

Jimmy Hoffa put JFK in office, JFK turned in him.

Jordie Barretts sock

Original Poster:

4,804 posts

21 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
That also has merit. Hoffa disappeared mysteriously too didn't he?

rdjohn

6,238 posts

197 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
It would have been difficult for The Mob to create the back story that set Oswald up as the patsy.

aeropilot

34,921 posts

229 months

Wednesday 22nd November 2023
quotequote all
nikaiyo2 said:
I think the argument that JFK was a mob assassination are more convincing than CIA/ FBI. I also think if it was “establishment” someone would have talked by now, deathbed confessions etc etc.
I think the opposite, as there would be no reason for the SS or military to need to cover up what they clearly saw as their failure to protect the Pres, and/or CIA involvement (rather than FBI) in setting it up...........its was the Mob, would have been easy to have pushed from the moment he died.
The accounts from the Parkland doctors 50 years after the event, along with the SS not wishing to abide by the law in not allowing the PM to be done according to Texas law, the witnesses confirming the body arrived in the Bethesda morgue in a different casket to the one clearly seen being placed on AF1 in Dallas, the military appointed two unqualified people to perform the PM.., and the list goes on....

Its was either a SS/CIA conspiracy or gross incompetence.....or a combination of both.

LHO clearly did shoot at JFK from the window, and likely at least hit Connally and from that tv programme the other night, may have also hit JFK in the back, although the fact that no exit would from that entry mark, and no bullet was ever discovered (or admitted to) from inside JFK's body from that entry would is still a mystery in regard that entry wound??

The accidental shot from a SS gun being the cause of the fatal head shot from the front is plausible in many ways.....but the entry hole in his forehead as shown and described by the doctors and later the 'official' PM, didn't seem to be big enough for a M1911 .45, which I assume back in 1963, all SS close protection details would have been armed with as the standard sidearm of the USA at that time...?

As for who it was, and why, well, that will likely remain a mystery for ever more.

My parents always remembered what they were doing the day JFK was shot, and by a quirk of fate, my father also died on Nov 22nd, 39 years to the day after JFK.