Would other countries be as 'willing' to help UK/US?

Would other countries be as 'willing' to help UK/US?

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

122,230 posts

267 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Spiritual_Beggar said:
Bluebarge said:
Why would they need to? UK and US are 2 of the richest nations on earth;
Is this still the case?

Especially with the UK.
UK is definitely not second in the world - although how you measure a nation's "richness" is debateable.

fido

16,879 posts

257 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
UK is definitely not second in the world - although how you measure a nation's "richness" is debateable.
If the richness of an individual is defined by how many persons he or she can count on as friends, then perhaps it is true of countries as well .. i think the UK does pretty well in this respect.

Eric Mc

122,230 posts

267 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
fido said:
Eric Mc said:
UK is definitely not second in the world - although how you measure a nation's "richness" is debateable.
If the richness of an individual is defined by how many persons he or she can count on as friends, then perhaps it is true of countries as well .. i think the UK does pretty well in this respect.
That's an interesing measure. I wonder what the OECD uses?

SeeFive

8,280 posts

235 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
This is going to raise a few hackles, but here we go anyway.

Nope, no need. We just do not get the type of issues on such a massive scale over here, and when we do get our feet a bit wet, we cope rather than hold our hands out and wail in the streets.

Floods, earthquakes - well, it is quite common there, so surely it's time for their government to stop spending on weapons and private jets, and up their DR plans.

And, whilst feeling sorry for the innocent victims, I am getting seriously fed up with putting my hand in my pocket (via my wife... "oh look at those poor suffering children", kerching, overdraft) every year at Red Nose Day for a number of reasons.

1) the corrupt governments should have enough cash to sort it out, after all they siphoned lots of it from similar charitable donations in the past
2) since the last "disastrous famine", the populous has continued to breed like rabbits and suffer whilst the rich ruling few live a life of Reilly
3) the unaddressed, massive issues around the promiscuity and generally believed concept that shagging a virgin gets rid of aids
4) no matter how much food, cash and education you throw at these people, it's the same every red nose day, and added to by the aids issue over the last few years. The videos of success stories shown are addressing a symptom, not the problem IMO.

Now I don't know about you, but I tend to think that artificially prolonging the life of an HIV person in such a backward and promiscuous society, surely is only going to make the 3rd world aids epidemic bigger as that individual distributes his plague wider whilst living longer. It's sad that an individual suffers, but it could be argued that it is for the greater good of the populous (and small babies raped by sufferers trying to guarantee virgin status for their cure).

Similarly, the population has outstripped the ability of the land to provide for the people. So the famine is a natural response to that, and we need to address the population issue rather than trying to feed it and encourage a greater dependence on third parties.

It's a big problem. Beyond me and my overdraft limit to solve. Until the root problems are addressed, my cash is a wasted donation, and will continue to go to the Air Ambulance and Cancer Research.

Dons flameproof suit.

theboyfold

10,940 posts

228 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
SeeFive said:
This is going to raise a few hackles, but here we go anyway.

Nope, no need. We just do not get the type of issues on such a massive scale over here, and when we do get our feet a bit wet, we cope rather than hold our hands out and wail in the streets.

Floods, earthquakes - well, it is quite common there, so surely it's time for their government to stop spending on weapons and private jets, and up their DR plans.

And, whilst feeling sorry for the innocent victims, I am getting seriously fed up with putting my hand in my pocket (via my wife... "oh look at those poor suffering children", kerching, overdraft) every year at Red Nose Day for a number of reasons.

1) the corrupt governments should have enough cash to sort it out, after all they siphoned lots of it from similar charitable donations in the past
2) since the last "disastrous famine", the populous has continued to breed like rabbits and suffer whilst the rich ruling few live a life of Reilly
3) the unaddressed, massive issues around the promiscuity and generally believed concept that shagging a virgin gets rid of aids
4) no matter how much food, cash and education you throw at these people, it's the same every red nose day, and added to by the aids issue over the last few years. The videos of success stories shown are addressing a symptom, not the problem IMO.

Now I don't know about you, but I tend to think that artificially prolonging the life of an HIV person in such a backward and promiscuous society, surely is only going to make the 3rd world aids epidemic bigger as that individual distributes his plague wider whilst living longer. It's sad that an individual suffers, but it could be argued that it is for the greater good of the populous (and small babies raped by sufferers trying to guarantee virgin status for their cure).

Similarly, the population has outstripped the ability of the land to provide for the people. So the famine is a natural response to that, and we need to address the population issue rather than trying to feed it and encourage a greater dependence on third parties.

It's a big problem. Beyond me and my overdraft limit to solve. Until the root problems are addressed, my cash is a wasted donation, and will continue to go to the Air Ambulance and Cancer Research.

Dons flameproof suit.
See, I've been having a row with somebody about this sort of thing on Facebook and my arguments aren't on the same topic (more about the aid to Pakistan) but have a similar train of thought. It's not a very PC thing to say nowadays how you should look after your own first, but I think there is a lot to be said in agreement with it.

MX7

7,902 posts

176 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
fido said:
Eric Mc said:
UK is definitely not second in the world - although how you measure a nation's "richness" is debateable.
If the richness of an individual is defined by how many persons he or she can count on as friends
I'm not rich, but I'm rich in my friends?!!! roflroflrofl

andy_s

19,423 posts

261 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all


The scale of the Pakistan floods is extraordinary.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

233 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
TuxRacer said:
amare32 said:
I think this would be the case, when New Orleans was flooded you certainly didn't hear about other countries opening up their wallets to assist with the aid effort..
I barely heard about the US opening their wallet though, to be fair.
Are you insane? The government funding to the Katrina affected regions have far surpassed the monetary cost of WWII. As to helping other nations with disasters.....you surely know we spend huge amounts on that.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

233 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
fido said:
I'm sure they would be willing to help, but there are always strings attached with any sort of help - even when it's between friends. Btw the UK is still paying for the help it received over fifty years ago ... still a quarter of 1 big one to go ..

http://chrisworth.com/2005/05/uks-debt-to-usa-gett...
That ended 4 years ago.....check your article's date. smile You do realize that, with the near zero interest rate, that it was advantageous for the U.K. to pay over that many years, don't you? I believe it was their choice to do so.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

233 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
andy_s said:


The scale of the Pakistan floods is extraordinary.
The "Uncommitted" pledge numbers on that chart are interesting.

Sheets Tabuer

19,121 posts

217 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
andy_s said:


The scale of the Pakistan floods is extraordinary.
The "Uncommitted" pledge numbers on that chart are interesting.
I can't help feeling anyone who can afford nukes doesn't need to put their hand in my pocket.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

233 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Sheets Tabuer said:
Jimbeaux said:
andy_s said:


The scale of the Pakistan floods is extraordinary.
The "Uncommitted" pledge numbers on that chart are interesting.
I can't help feeling anyone who can afford nukes doesn't need to put their hand in my pocket.
You may have a point.

Brink

1,505 posts

210 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Them down-under would give us helping hand, I'm sure. The Ozzies offers to help out with Argies in 1982. The yanks would hesitate and eventually, in return for some new invention...

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

233 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Brink said:
Them down-under would give us helping hand, I'm sure. The Ozzies offers to help out with Argies in 1982. The yanks would hesitate and eventually, in return for some new invention...
We jump to help everyone with a natural disaster, what makes you think we wouldn't help you? As long as everyone does not have your attitude, we will be right there.

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

211 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
172ff said:
If Pakistan has enough money to develop nuclear weapons, they have enough cash to sort out there own problems. IMO of course.
^^^ This.

Brink

1,505 posts

210 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
Jimbeaux said:
Brink said:
Them down-under would give us helping hand, I'm sure. The Ozzies offers to help out with Argies in 1982. The yanks would hesitate and eventually, in return for some new invention...
We jump to help everyone with a natural disaster, what makes you think we wouldn't help you? As long as everyone does not have your attitude, we will be right there.
shoot And then there's the friendly fire problem....

Mojooo

12,805 posts

182 months

Thursday 19th August 2010
quotequote all
172ff said:
If Pakistan has enough money to develop nuclear weapons, they have enough cash to sort out there own problems. IMO of course.
like the UK?

we cant even give our kids good school buildings!! biggrin



--

also worth bearing in mind the UK has much better infrastructure and people to deal with our own problems - i think lack of skills and equipment is the killer for poorer palces like Pakistan - and also the fact the poorer peopel cannot afford to buy their own way out of trouble - i.e find hotels etc

andy_s

19,423 posts

261 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
172ff said:
If Pakistan has enough money to develop nuclear weapons, they have enough cash to sort out there own problems. IMO of course.
and also the fact the poorer peopel cannot afford to buy their own way out of trouble - i.e find hotels etc
You're going to be hard pressed finding 11 million hotel rooms anywhere.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

233 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Brink said:
Jimbeaux said:
Brink said:
Them down-under would give us helping hand, I'm sure. The Ozzies offers to help out with Argies in 1982. The yanks would hesitate and eventually, in return for some new invention...
We jump to help everyone with a natural disaster, what makes you think we wouldn't help you? As long as everyone does not have your attitude, we will be right there.
shoot And then there's the friendly fire problem....
Well, since we are talking natural disaster response, let's hope no firing is involved, friendly or otherwise. wink

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

211 months

Friday 20th August 2010
quotequote all
Todays MSN Home page

" UK to double aid to Pakistan"

rolleyes