As Iraq Winds Down, Time for some Ridiculous WMD Quotes
Discussion
"There were no WMDS in Iraq." or "how come they didnt find any chemical weapons in Iraq"
Well thats just not true is it? They found a few shells with chemical agents in them. True its very different from able to launch an attack on the UK within 45 minutes, but there were chemical weapons found in Iraq post 2003. Think the Iraqi army had forgotten about them as well though.
Or the classic "Iraq never had chemical weapons" haha some people!
Well thats just not true is it? They found a few shells with chemical agents in them. True its very different from able to launch an attack on the UK within 45 minutes, but there were chemical weapons found in Iraq post 2003. Think the Iraqi army had forgotten about them as well though.
Or the classic "Iraq never had chemical weapons" haha some people!
Jimbeaux said:
Bodo said:
Jimbeaux said:
Bodo said:
Jimbeaux said:
Bodo said:
Jimbeaux said:
Marf said:
Touched a nerve eh Jim ![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
Not really, it is just so obvious and stale. ![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
Colonial said:
My my my Jimbeaux my old china plate. You really can dish it out, but you also really can't take it ![tongue out](/inc/images/tongue.gif)
Oh no, taking it is part of the game, no problem. However, taking it from someone who is obviously not in the spirit of "courteous opposition" is not on my to do list. Certain of our lot are constantly "battling", but with an underlying respect. ![tongue out](/inc/images/tongue.gif)
To me personally , it doesn't matter that saddam didn't have WMD s because we all know he would have done everything in his power to Get his hands on some just to piss the west off ( a bit like Iran )
On a different note, I was listening to James obrien on lbc today and he put things in perspective in one sentence . Why didn't the Muslims community extremised when saddam was killing they're brothers , or when muhaddamesgiad kills people bythe thousands ?
On a different note, I was listening to James obrien on lbc today and he put things in perspective in one sentence . Why didn't the Muslims community extremised when saddam was killing they're brothers , or when muhaddamesgiad kills people bythe thousands ?
frosted said:
To me personally , it doesn't matter that saddam didn't have WMD s because we all know he would have done everything in his power to Get his hands on some just to piss the west off ( a bit like Iran )
On a different note, I was listening to James obrien on lbc today and he put things in perspective in one sentence . Why didn't the Muslims community extremised when saddam was killing they're brothers , or when muhaddamesgiad kills people bythe thousands ?
wtf?On a different note, I was listening to James obrien on lbc today and he put things in perspective in one sentence . Why didn't the Muslims community extremised when saddam was killing they're brothers , or when muhaddamesgiad kills people bythe thousands ?
frosted said:
To me personally , it doesn't matter that saddam didn't have WMD s because we all know he would have done everything in his power to Get his hands on some just to piss the west off ( a bit like Iran )
On a different note, I was listening to James obrien on lbc today and he put things in perspective in one sentence . Why didn't the Muslims community extremised when saddam was killing they're brothers , or when muhaddamesgiad kills people bythe thousands ?
Excellent question. Don't expect an answer though; for certain not a straight one. On a different note, I was listening to James obrien on lbc today and he put things in perspective in one sentence . Why didn't the Muslims community extremised when saddam was killing they're brothers , or when muhaddamesgiad kills people bythe thousands ?
Mr Dave said:
"There were no WMDS in Iraq." or "how come they didnt find any chemical weapons in Iraq"
Well thats just not true is it? They found a few shells with chemical agents in them. True its very different from able to launch an attack on the UK within 45 minutes, but there were chemical weapons found in Iraq post 2003. Think the Iraqi army had forgotten about them as well though.
Or the classic "Iraq never had chemical weapons" haha some people!
iirc the media went mad and then it turned out to be an empty shell left over from before the first Gulf War.Well thats just not true is it? They found a few shells with chemical agents in them. True its very different from able to launch an attack on the UK within 45 minutes, but there were chemical weapons found in Iraq post 2003. Think the Iraqi army had forgotten about them as well though.
Or the classic "Iraq never had chemical weapons" haha some people!
Rest assured the echo chamber wouldn't let you forget it if they did find anything.
frosted said:
To me personally , it doesn't matter that saddam didn't have WMD s because we all know he would have done everything in his power to Get his hands on some just to piss the west off ( a bit like Iran )
It raises massive questions about the competence/agenda of those who interpret the intelligence. Seems to me that instead of using facts to come to a conclusion about Iraq they came to their conclusion first and then found 'evidence' which supported what they had already decided.Meanwhile North Korea have tested a nuclear weapon!
collateral said:
Marf said:
collateral said:
Jimbeaux said:
...Why not spend your energy beating on the current idiot in the Whitehouse instead...
What does that make Palin?![laugh](/inc/images/laugh.gif)
"The next (lip wobble) George Washington (voice tremble) is in this crowd"
Vacuous hatemongering
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
Jimbeaux said:
frosted said:
To me personally , it doesn't matter that saddam didn't have WMD s because we all know he would have done everything in his power to Get his hands on some just to piss the west off ( a bit like Iran )
On a different note, I was listening to James obrien on lbc today and he put things in perspective in one sentence . Why didn't the Muslims community extremised when saddam was killing they're brothers , or when muhaddamesgiad kills people bythe thousands ?
Excellent question. Don't expect an answer though; for certain not a straight one. On a different note, I was listening to James obrien on lbc today and he put things in perspective in one sentence . Why didn't the Muslims community extremised when saddam was killing they're brothers , or when muhaddamesgiad kills people bythe thousands ?
![hehe](/inc/images/hehe.gif)
Edited by Marf on Wednesday 1st September 13:54
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff