If you don't want Tesco's

Author
Discussion

Pothole

34,367 posts

284 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Dixie68 said:
Pothole said:
Dixie68 said:
Agreed. I was dozing on the sofa after a nightshift last night and had the TV on in the background on the BBC News channel. I heard the presenter saying something along the lines of, "the police used disproportionate force" and wondered what it was about so went online and saw it was about squatters with petrol-bombs. "Disproportionate force" - I don't think so, not enough force.
Really, how do the beeb get away with it?
how do they get away with reporting what a bystander said? You weren't listening properly were you, you can hardly justifiably get annoyed at something you half heard.
I've highlighted the part of my post where I said I was annoyed. You weren't reading properly were you? tongue out
Having reread twice I still can't see what you're blaming the BBC for. Whatever, it's far enough away from my front door that I couldn't really care less.

Dixie68

3,091 posts

189 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Pothole said:
Dixie68 said:
Agreed. I was dozing on the sofa after a nightshift last night and had the TV on in the background on the BBC News channel. I heard the presenter saying something along the lines of, "the police used disproportionate force" and wondered what it was about so went online and saw it was about squatters with petrol-bombs. "Disproportionate force" - I don't think so, not enough force.
Really, how do the beeb get away with it?
how do they get away with reporting what a bystander said? You weren't listening properly were you, you can hardly justifiably get annoyed at something you half heard.
Sorry, are you being deliberately obtuse or are you just one of those people who moan for the sake of it? Again, where did I state I was annoyed. The 'not enough' part that you re-added the bold to? Does that say I was annoyed? I suppose if I juggle letters around from my post I can come up with 'annoyed'.

Pothole

34,367 posts

284 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Dixie68 said:
Pothole said:
Dixie68 said:
Agreed. I was dozing on the sofa after a nightshift last night and had the TV on in the background on the BBC News channel. I heard the presenter saying something along the lines of, "the police used disproportionate force" and wondered what it was about so went online and saw it was about squatters with petrol-bombs. "Disproportionate force" - I don't think so, not enough force.
Really, how do the beeb get away with it?
how do they get away with reporting what a bystander said? You weren't listening properly were you, you can hardly justifiably get annoyed at something you half heard.
Sorry, are you being deliberately obtuse or are you just one of those people who moan for the sake of it? Again, where did I state I was annoyed. The 'not enough' part that you re-added the bold to? Does that say I was annoyed? I suppose if I juggle letters around from my post I can come up with 'annoyed'.
I didn't 're-add' anything anywhere.

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
""I think there were two waves. The first one anti-Tesco, then it calmed down and turned into a street party.

"It turned quite festive - people were playing Louis Armstrong. Then it turned into a riot, there was a barricade of bins and skips on fire.

"It turned into a running battle for about two hours."

So it was a protest that turned into a party that turned into a riot then into a fight!
Can't tesco build them a stadium, it's what they normally dobiggrin

Dixie68

3,091 posts

189 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Pothole said:
I didn't 're-add' anything anywhere.
Ok, forget it, you win, whatever you say I was feeling when I did whatever I did is correct. You are my ex-wife AICMFP

NoNeed

15,137 posts

202 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
This is just the sort of thing the police could use positively to regain the publics trust and faith.
When large organisation operate outside of public interests and wishes, such things as opposing liquer sales/license and generally making trading difficult would show the public which side of the law you are all on and that you are in it together.

Pothole

34,367 posts

284 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
not really part of the Police remit, though is it? The opinions of local residents should have been taken on board by the planning committee surely?

Edited by Pothole on Friday 22 April 19:06

fergywales

1,624 posts

196 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
NoNeed said:
This is just the sort of thing the police could use positively to regain the publics trust and faith.
When large organisation operate outside of public interests and wishes, such things as opposing liquer sales/license and generally making trading difficult would show the public which side of the law you are all on and that you are in it together.
The cogs of bureaucracy move freely when oiled with money. Tesco are notorious for it.

Edited by fergywales on Friday 22 April 18:17

Pothole

34,367 posts

284 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
of course they are...still nowt to do with the Police is it?

fergywales

1,624 posts

196 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Pothole said:
of course they are...still nowt to do with the Police is it?
Quoted wrong post silly

Maybe one too many beers in the sun today?

NoNeed

15,137 posts

202 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
The remit as I understand it is law and order, tescos ignorance of planning laws and comittees is causing unrest.
The police could act if they wanted to.

fergywales

1,624 posts

196 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
NoNeed said:
The remit as I understand it is law and order, tescos ignorance of planning laws and comittees is causing unrest.
The police could act if they wanted to.
Really? confused

You believe it is for the Police to intervene when an LA gives the go ahead to a company like Tesco to build a new store, against the wishes of the local population (minority or majority view)?

Glad you have nothing to grumble about with your council tax bill! wink

Pothole

34,367 posts

284 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
guess we'll have to look elsewhere for intelligent informed debate...

Pesty

42,655 posts

258 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
telecat said:
Looks like they have gone one store too far.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-13169...

I've been wondering when a community whose views are ignored would finally snap at a "planning" decision.
Could you tell me how many were for it and how many against the hugely convinient small shop?

They didnt need to smash it up just not shop there then it would close. People who wanted it would shop there.
That would be the true comunity view.

a few squatters with far far left sentiments didn't want it there. They never want anything though do they those sorts.

NoNeed

15,137 posts

202 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
fergy, sorry i'm on phone so cannot quote. I was onabout when they go ahead eith a store before permission is granted as they have done many times.

fergywales

1,624 posts

196 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
NoNeed said:
fergy, sorry i'm on phone so cannot quote. I was onabout when they go ahead eith a store before permission is granted as they have done many times.
This store had correct planning and licencing confirmations in place, I attended a number of the hearings myself (as said previously, I was an interested party until not that long ago).

bobr

1,031 posts

166 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
STOP PRESSING REFRESH ON YOUR PHONE FOR fk'S SAKE

Godzuki

73,668 posts

257 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
bobr said:
STOP PRESSING REFRESH ON YOUR PHONE FOR fk'S SAKE
hehe

Pothole

34,367 posts

284 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
fergywales said:
NoNeed said:
fergy, sorry i'm on phone so cannot quote. I was onabout when they go ahead eith a store before permission is granted as they have done many times.
This store had correct planning and licencing confirmations in place, I attended a number of the hearings myself (as said previously, I was an interested party until not that long ago).
come on, fergy, don't let facts get in the way of a good fat cat-global business runs roughshod over peasants story!

NoNeed

15,137 posts

202 months

Friday 22nd April 2011
quotequote all
Sorry about that lol smile

And about the permission I didn't realise they had it, this screen is too small to read properly.