Missing Woman Sarah Everard

[Pothole]

andyA700 said:

The Spruce Goose said:

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vigil-pr...

Fact Check-The protester arrested at Sarah Everard vigil is not a crisis actress

The problem you have got is people like you looking to back up your convoluted thoughts, and media means nowadays you can back up your views with random pieces on extremely biased outlets.

Just FYI

''Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.''

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/

I'm really suprised PH is allowing such misinformed and biased posts,

Edited by The Spruce Goose on Thursday 7th October 12:31

Do you believe her story, that fifty policemen and security officers dressed in uniform, contacted her on Tinder, yet she didn't report any of them?
Do you believe, that a person who in their own words is "terrified" of the police, would then deliberately put themselves in a postition to be arrested on two seperate vigils?
I should add something which I have just read from Tinder's own regulations -

"Only the people you've liked are allowed to contact you on Tinder so there's no chance that you'll get a bunch of unsolicited messages; and those users you have allowed can be blocked if they get annoying or a bit creepy."

https://www.techadvisor.com/how-to/software/tinder...

She has said she has Tinder Gold and the article you linked to says this:

Likes You does what it sounds like - it lets you see who's already swiped right on you, so you can make sure to pay special attention to the profiles of people who you know like you before you commit to swiping in return. You can see a full list of every profile that's liked you so that you can browse through and swipe either way on them while knowing they're interested in you.

So perhaps the journo who conducted her possibly slightly hysterical interview misinterpreted what "contacted" actually meant in context.

[38911]

The Spruce Goose said:

38911 said:

There's a world outside PH, you know. The 'eroticised humiliation' discussion has taken place extensively on multiple platforms many months ago - none have anything to do with PH, but don't let that stop you from being a drama queen.

https://unherd.com/thepost/is-patsy-stevenson-a-cr...

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vigil-protester-idUSL1N2LG1NX

Fact Check-The protester arrested at Sarah Everard vigil is not a crisis actress

The problem you have got is people like you looking to back up your convoluted thoughts, and media means nowadays you can back up your views with random pieces on extremely biased outlets.

Just FYI

''Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.''

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/

I'm really suprised PH is allowing such misinformed and biased posts,

Edited by The Spruce Goose on Thursday 7th October 12:31

Oh do jog on pal with your sanctimonious bks. This is a discussion forum and I was referencing a view expressed by a multitude of sources.

Save the moral lectures for someone who gives a st.

[Cold]

38911 said:

The Spruce Goose said:

38911 said:

There's a world outside PH, you know. The 'eroticised humiliation' discussion has taken place extensively on multiple platforms many months ago - none have anything to do with PH, but don't let that stop you from being a drama queen.

https://unherd.com/thepost/is-patsy-stevenson-a-cr...

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vigil-protester-idUSL1N2LG1NX

Fact Check-The protester arrested at Sarah Everard vigil is not a crisis actress

The problem you have got is people like you looking to back up your convoluted thoughts, and media means nowadays you can back up your views with random pieces on extremely biased outlets.

Just FYI

''Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.''

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/

I'm really suprised PH is allowing such misinformed and biased posts,

Edited by The Spruce Goose on Thursday 7th October 12:31

Oh do jog on pal with your sanctimonious bks. This is a discussion forum and I was referencing a view expressed by a multitude of sources.

Save the moral lectures for someone who gives a st.

Ah, another police officer on PH.

[38911]

Cold said:

38911 said:

The Spruce Goose said:

38911 said:

There's a world outside PH, you know. The 'eroticised humiliation' discussion has taken place extensively on multiple platforms many months ago - none have anything to do with PH, but don't let that stop you from being a drama queen.

https://unherd.com/thepost/is-patsy-stevenson-a-cr...

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vigil-protester-idUSL1N2LG1NX

Fact Check-The protester arrested at Sarah Everard vigil is not a crisis actress

The problem you have got is people like you looking to back up your convoluted thoughts, and media means nowadays you can back up your views with random pieces on extremely biased outlets.

Just FYI

''Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.''

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/

I'm really suprised PH is allowing such misinformed and biased posts,

Edited by The Spruce Goose on Thursday 7th October 12:31

Oh do jog on pal with your sanctimonious bks. This is a discussion forum and I was referencing a view expressed by a multitude of sources.

Save the moral lectures for someone who gives a st.

Ah, another police officer on PH.

Errr... no. I wouldn't get out of bed for the pittance that a copper gets paid, let alone have to put up with some of the unwashed out there who seem hell bent on antagonising them.

[Greendubber]

MrBogSmith said:

pavarotti1980 said:

The Spruce Goose said:

I'm really suprised PH is allowing such misinformed and biased posts,

Edited by The Spruce Goose on Thursday 7th October 12:31

Quite. An astonishing lack of self-awareness.

This.

[Greendubber]

Cold said:

38911 said:

The Spruce Goose said:

38911 said:

There's a world outside PH, you know. The 'eroticised humiliation' discussion has taken place extensively on multiple platforms many months ago - none have anything to do with PH, but don't let that stop you from being a drama queen.

https://unherd.com/thepost/is-patsy-stevenson-a-cr...

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vigil-protester-idUSL1N2LG1NX

Fact Check-The protester arrested at Sarah Everard vigil is not a crisis actress

The problem you have got is people like you looking to back up your convoluted thoughts, and media means nowadays you can back up your views with random pieces on extremely biased outlets.

Just FYI

''Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.''

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/

I'm really suprised PH is allowing such misinformed and biased posts,

Edited by The Spruce Goose on Thursday 7th October 12:31

Oh do jog on pal with your sanctimonious bks. This is a discussion forum and I was referencing a view expressed by a multitude of sources.

Save the moral lectures for someone who gives a st.

Ah, another police officer on PH.

Not read any of Spruce Gooses earlier posts then I take it?

[anonymoususer]

38911 said:

Errr... no. I wouldn't get out of bed for the pittance that a copper gets paid, let alone have to put up with some of the unwashed out there who seem hell bent on antagonising them.

Are you Peter Bottomley ?

[rover 623gsi]

Meanwhile...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/07/inde...

The indecent exposure epidemic: ‘How are they not taking this seriously after Sarah Everard?’

Guardian analysis of Office for National Statistics (ONS) and Ministry of Justice data for England and Wales revealed that 10,775 indecent exposure cases were logged by police in 2020, but just 594 suspects were taken to court. The true figures are likely to be much higher. “The vast majority of women, if you talk to them, will remember an experience of being flashed,” says Dr Fiona Vera-Gray of Durham University, an expert on sexual violence and street harassment. “But most never report being flashed because they’re never sure if they will be blamed, or if people will think it’s their fault.”

[anonymous-user]

Greendubber said:

Not read any of Spruce Gooses earlier posts then I take it?

I post my own opinion s not "facts" based on conspiracy theories on dubious websites. I am pretty shocked by the demonization of women on here really The smears and slander in this case clearly needs a rebuttal.

We we ever find out why he wiped his phone 30 minutes before police turned up, no I guess.

Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 7th October 16:37

[Greendubber]

The Spruce Goose said:

Greendubber said:

Not read any of Spruce Gooses earlier posts then I take it?

I post my own opinion s not "facts" based on conspiracy theories on dubious websites. I am pretty shocked by the demonization of women on here really, by serving police people. The smears and slander in this case clearly needs a rebuttal.

We we ever find out why he wiped his phone 30 minutes before police turned up, no I guess.

Tell us another....

[38911]

The Spruce Goose said:

Greendubber said:

Not read any of Spruce Gooses earlier posts then I take it?

I post my own opinion s not "facts" based on conspiracy theories on dubious websites. I am pretty shocked by the demonization of women on here really, by serving police people. The smears and slander in this case clearly needs a rebuttal.

We we ever find out why he wiped his phone 30 minutes before police turned up, no I guess.

And yet when others post their opinions, you wet yourself.

I have not read every single post on here but from what I have seen, I've seen no sign of (as you dramatically put it) "demonisation of women".

I have however seen some people questioning the authenticity of an anti-police activist that turned up to a silent vigil, started shouting at and antagonising Police (as evidenced in multiple videos), ignored repeated police instructions to disperse, and unsurprisingly ended up getting herself arrested (which was clearly the outcome she was seeking).

Her subsequent accusations against the Police simply don't stand up to rational scrutiny.

[techguyone]

The Spruce Goose said:

Greendubber said:

Not read any of Spruce Gooses earlier posts then I take it?

I post my own opinion s not "facts" based on conspiracy theories on dubious websites. I am pretty shocked by the demonization of women on here really The smears and slander in this case clearly needs a rebuttal.

We we ever find out why he wiped his phone 30 minutes before police turned up, no I guess.

Edited by The Spruce Goose on Thursday 7th October 16:37

It's not rocket science, he was either wiping it because he was just getting it ready to sell....

or

He wanted other people to not see whatever was on it.

I know which option was the more likely.

[carl_w]

techguyone said:

It's not rocket science, he was either wiping it because he was just getting it ready to sell....

or

He wanted other people to not see whatever was on it.

I know which option was the more likely.

Bit of a coincidence though if he didn't know the police were going to turn up?

[XCP]

He knew the police were going to turn up throughout.

[LeadFarmer]

Fake cop sentenced for trying to arrest woman...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-5882...

[carl_w]

XCP said:

He knew the police were going to turn up throughout.

But they turned up only 30 mins after he wiped his phone.

[XCP]

carl_w said:

XCP said:

He knew the police were going to turn up throughout.

But they turned up only 30 mins after he wiped his phone.

And you are suggesting they attempted to pervert the course of justice by warning him?

[carl_w]

XCP said:

And you are suggesting they attempted to pervert the course of justice by warning him?

It's possible that "someone" warned him (maybe via the WhatsApp group) otherwise it seems a massive coincidence?

[XCP]

carl_w said:

XCP said:

And you are suggesting they attempted to pervert the course of justice by warning him?

It's possible that "someone" warned him (maybe via the WhatsApp group) otherwise it seems a massive coincidence?

Who do you think would do that? Some corrupt officer from the investigating team who wanted to see him get away with it?

[carl_w]

XCP said:

Who do you think would do that? Some corrupt officer from the investigating team who wanted to see him get away with it?

I have no idea. Do you not find it odd?