List of banned Olympic items..

Author
Discussion

Vipers

32,975 posts

230 months

Friday 20th July 2012
quotequote all
If you wear a t-shirt with " Pepsi" on you will be evicted, (apparantly), god elp us.




smile

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Friday 20th July 2012
quotequote all
Vipers said:
If you wear a t-shirt with " Pepsi" on you will be evicted, (apparantly), god elp us.
I'd like gangs to put that to the test.



Is London banned?

Laurel Green

30,802 posts

234 months

Friday 20th July 2012
quotequote all
Just a thought; are G4S official sponsors? Perhaps why they are a no show in such large numbers, for fear of being ejected.

Vipers

32,975 posts

230 months

Friday 20th July 2012
quotequote all
Halb said:
Vipers said:
If you wear a t-shirt with " Pepsi" on you will be evicted, (apparantly), god elp us.
I'd like gangs to put that to the test.



Is London banned?
Why not try "Pipsi", or "Pespi" just to pi$$ them off biggrin




smile

Lost_BMW

12,955 posts

178 months

Friday 20th July 2012
quotequote all
I hope people come en masse to challnege these illiberal 'rulings' So glad we live in a fully functioing democracy.

Also, optimistically (naively) that people might boycott the products of the corporate rulers of our fair nation and its 'People's Games". I bought a can of diet coke at the services yesterday and then realised what I'd done when I spotted the logos on the can. Never again. Won't be buying from them again. Also intend getting some new training shoes this summer - no guesses for which brand I won't consider now.




Off to start a thread about not buying milk from Tescburys..!

Edited by Lost_BMW on Friday 20th July 23:44

Mojooo

12,834 posts

182 months

Friday 20th July 2012
quotequote all
free market aint it? dont like the product on offer keep your beak out and dont buy it.

the simple fact is, or the one put forward by LOCOG is that if sponsors didnt get exclusivity they wouldnt pay and therefore there would be no games.

damn, when did i start supporting the free market!

fluffnik

20,156 posts

229 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
free market aint it? dont like the product on offer keep your beak out and dont buy it.
Olympic sponsors are off my shopping list.

Mojooo said:
the simple fact is, or the one put forward by LOCOG is that if sponsors didnt get exclusivity they wouldnt pay and therefore there would be no games.
Only problem is it's complete bull-puckie.

Even the sponsors who don't (directly) profit from their involvement are contributing a tiny fraction of what us tax-payers are getting stiffed for and we don't get the slightest sniff of the profits.

Mojooo said:
damn, when did i start supporting the free market!
None is visible in the Olympic Park...

Mojooo

12,834 posts

182 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
Of course, but the premise is that LOCOG get a significant amount of money from IP - which reduces the amount taxpayers pay and is essential to even hosting the games.

I wouldn't be too fussed about being forced to buy certain products (or limited rather) - to some extent you get it at any stadium event (i.e over priced food).

The security would annoy me more. I bet peopel will be kettled like sheep and getting in and out of venues will take forever.

Lost_BMW

12,955 posts

178 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
Of course, but the premise is that LOCOG get a significant amount of money from IP - which reduces the amount taxpayers pay and is essential to even hosting the games.

I wouldn't be too fussed about being forced to buy certain products (or limited rather) - to some extent you get it at any stadium event (i.e over priced food).

The security would annoy me more. I bet peopel will be kettled like sheep and getting in and out of venues will take forever.
I've never been to a stadium or event where you can't wear kit from rivals to the sponsors, not since the rally in '36.

GWC

4,423 posts

197 months

CoolHands

18,883 posts

197 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
has anyone mentioned the tax-free breaks all the sponsors are getting?

campaign

since the campaign started some have agreed to pay their tax, but not all!

Mojooo

12,834 posts

182 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
Lost_BMW said:
I've never been to a stadium or event where you can't wear kit from rivals to the sponsors, not since the rally in '36.
And what proof is there that they will prevent people walking in with Pepsi tops? Its nonsense.

As the article posted above this post shows, they can take action against ambush marketing - i.e lots of people in Pepsi clothing who are doing it on purpose.


WhoseGeneration

4,090 posts

209 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
For whom are these joyous celebrations of the sporting prowess of human individuals run?

fluffnik

20,156 posts

229 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
Lost_BMW said:
I've never been to a stadium or event where you can't wear kit from rivals to the sponsors, not since the rally in '36.
It has taken a triumph of the will not to laugh at that...

Use Psychology

11,327 posts

194 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
free market aint it? dont like the product on offer keep your beak out and dont buy it.

the simple fact is, or the one put forward by LOCOG is that if sponsors didnt get exclusivity they wouldnt pay and therefore there would be no games.

damn, when did i start supporting the free market!
exclusivity for: signage and logos and stuff. At the stadium. on their goods, etc. no problem.

exclusivity of logos worn on the clothes of the crowd? bit much.

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
joe_90 said:
I so want to make a website to document all this farce.
Have you? Has anyone? (Like the Royal Dutch Shell guy?biggrin)

bitchstewie

52,360 posts

212 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
I really do find myself torn between not wanting the UK to be a laughing stock if the games go badly, to wanting it to be a total utter fk up in the vein hope that people will finally realise just how far we've sold ourselves down the corporate river.

keslake

657 posts

208 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
^^^^^^^Excactly what he said

Engineer1

10,486 posts

211 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
Mojooo said:
miniman said:
Indeed, why would they?

http://www.newhamrecorder.co.uk/newham-life/organi...

Seems that they do, though...
I know they probably do.

What I meant was - why would they care about annoying small businesses - its no loss to them to protect their brand - so they dont care about annoying small businesses.

Maybe small busiensses should take the message that the Olympics dont want them using their brand and to stop using it!
So I open a Greek restaurant specializing in food from the Region round mount Olympus, what would you call it?

Also do the IOC think that someone walking past will go ok, that small corner cafe says olympic, so it must be official?

The thing is this same bull will be enforced no matter which country the games is being hosted in as it is part of the games.

Fort Jefferson

8,237 posts

224 months

Saturday 21st July 2012
quotequote all
The whole thing is a fking scam.

It's not our Olympics, is there's, and if we want to be part of it
we've got to pay through the fking nose for it.

I'm glad I don't want to be part of it, but feel for the people who were
desperate for tickets and were let down.

I hope the whole event falls into a fking big hole in the ground.