Police in search for missing 5 year old
Discussion
Grenoble said:
dandarez said:
I can see, and agree, with the introduction of it to prevent the Gene Hunt beating the f... out of the suspect.
But the diddums sleep deprivation of a suspect, while a 5-year-old victim could be left out in the wilds of night part loses me I'm afraid.
Question is, whe do you draw the line?But the diddums sleep deprivation of a suspect, while a 5-year-old victim could be left out in the wilds of night part loses me I'm afraid.
Grenoble said:
dandarez said:
I can see, and agree, with the introduction of it to prevent the Gene Hunt beating the f... out of the suspect.
But the diddums sleep deprivation of a suspect, while a 5-year-old victim could be left out in the wilds of night part loses me I'm afraid.
Question is, whe do you draw the line?But the diddums sleep deprivation of a suspect, while a 5-year-old victim could be left out in the wilds of night part loses me I'm afraid.
dandarez said:
I can see, and agree, with the introduction of it to prevent the Gene Hunt beating the f... out of the suspect.
But the diddums sleep deprivation of a suspect, while a 5-year-old victim could be left out in the wilds of night part loses me I'm afraid.
Beating them up, depriving them of sleep and food - what's the difference really?But the diddums sleep deprivation of a suspect, while a 5-year-old victim could be left out in the wilds of night part loses me I'm afraid.
If you're banged up without so much as a glass of water for 12 hours and questioned until your tongue is rattling around in your mouth, I reckon you'd say anything just to get your hands on one.
Just because they've let him out for a meal and a nap doesn't mean that he'll be let off the hook - he's under arrest, they can continue to question him in a few hours.
Also, when deprived of sleep, your recollection of events starts to get hazy and confused. You lose track of times and order of events. Sometimes allowing them to sleep on it makes for better evidence. Doesn't mean they stop searching for her.
VoziKaoFangio said:
Grenoble said:
dandarez said:
I can see, and agree, with the introduction of it to prevent the Gene Hunt beating the f... out of the suspect.
But the diddums sleep deprivation of a suspect, while a 5-year-old victim could be left out in the wilds of night part loses me I'm afraid.
Question is, whe do you draw the line?But the diddums sleep deprivation of a suspect, while a 5-year-old victim could be left out in the wilds of night part loses me I'm afraid.
If they haven't withdrawn it, then I suspect they have enough evidence to continue the search, and the man's recall of events is more important to the investigation than the kind of immediate and precise details that might be required in, say, an armed hostage situation.
dandarez said:
I can see, and agree, with the introduction of it to prevent the Gene Hunt beating the f... out of the suspect.
But the diddums sleep deprivation of a suspect, while a 5-year-old victim could be left out in the wilds of night part loses me I'm afraid.
Okay supose she is deadBut the diddums sleep deprivation of a suspect, while a 5-year-old victim could be left out in the wilds of night part loses me I'm afraid.
Lets kick the crap out of him
He gets let off scott free by his lawyer
He kills another child
Good outcome?
Puggit said:
Police now asking for amateur searchers again...
That might be positive, you can trust well meaning amateurs to find a little girl tied up or in a remote campsite, but perhaps you'd rather not have them marching about if you're main concern is finding DNA evidence for a conviction?Fingers crossed, there's still time for a positive outcome.
Bluebarge said:
That's rather the point. He isn't guilty, he is just a suspect, the police don't have enough evidence to charge him otherwise they would have done so already. Even if they do charge him he is not guilty until that evidence is tested in court and the jury find him so.
true but to release his photo as well as name him publicly they must of had good evidence towards his involvement?I often wonder what happens during questiong, I seem to rember Roy Whiting said nothing but no comment during his leading the police to convict on the strength of the evidence, I could be wrong.
If he was guily and she was alive somewhere would he not be more inclined to own up to mitigate any sentence?
As a parent of kids the same age its incomprehensible to understand what they must be going through
If he was guily and she was alive somewhere would he not be more inclined to own up to mitigate any sentence?
As a parent of kids the same age its incomprehensible to understand what they must be going through
birdcage said:
I often wonder what happens during questiong, I seem to rember Roy Whiting said nothing but no comment during his leading the police to convict on the strength of the evidence, I could be wrong.
If he was guily and she was alive somewhere would he not be more inclined to own up to mitigate any sentence?
As a parent of kids the same age its incomprehensible to understand what they must be going through
I think you'll find most lawyers advise their clients to 'no comment' through questioning.If he was guily and she was alive somewhere would he not be more inclined to own up to mitigate any sentence?
As a parent of kids the same age its incomprehensible to understand what they must be going through
WCZ said:
Bluebarge said:
That's rather the point. He isn't guilty, he is just a suspect, the police don't have enough evidence to charge him otherwise they would have done so already. Even if they do charge him he is not guilty until that evidence is tested in court and the jury find him so.
true but to release his photo as well as name him publicly they must of had good evidence towards his involvement?I personally feel that the police know a lot, maybe even so far as having found the girl already and are trying to tie up loose ends to nail the conviction. This is very much a backwater police force - as my (welsh) mother always says: "they do things differently here"
Puggit said:
Either that or are extremely desperate.
I personally feel that the police know a lot, maybe even so far as having found the girl already and are trying to tie up loose ends to nail the conviction. This is very much a backwater police force - as my (welsh) mother always says: "they do things differently here"
Seriously? I mean, seriously?I personally feel that the police know a lot, maybe even so far as having found the girl already and are trying to tie up loose ends to nail the conviction. This is very much a backwater police force - as my (welsh) mother always says: "they do things differently here"
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff