More UKIP woes

[don'tbesilly]

Ghibli said:

don'tbesilly said:

Ghibli said:

don'tbesilly said:

No, we agreed you didn't want any discount even thought the chairs were faux leather and manufactured for the masses, and you still wouldn't be able to afford them.

Irrelevant to the thread nonsense from Ghibli

Can you answer the two questions please:


Can you name one known UKIP supporter in this thread?

Of the 216 posts in this thread, can you quote one where the poster has supported the texts sent by the vacuous bint, and which sidicks has subsequently gone on to defend?

Although I very much doubt that you will understand this. The point that I was making was that sidick has managed to argue his way through this thread when he is agreeing with what has been said, he then goes on to call MX5nut a troll.

See if you can work it out on your own or with the "we" that are in your head.

While you are at it, would £10.000 per dining room chair be the sort of budget I should be looking at. Let's not forget they are dinning room chairs.

You wrote:

Ghibli said:

Over 10% of the posts in this thread are from you. You are either defending these Kippers are you are not but it can't be both.

Which is it?

I asked two questions in response:

don'tbesilly said:

Can you name one known UKIP supporter in this thread?

Of the 216 posts in this thread, can you quote one where the poster has supported the texts sent by the vacuous bint, and which sidicks has subsequently gone on to defend?

Are you going to answer them?

[anonymous-user]

don'tbesilly said:

Are you going to answer them?

Did you understand my last post?

[sidicks]

Ghibli said:

Although I very much doubt that you will understand this. The point that I was making was that sidick has managed to argue his way through this thread when he is agreeing with what has been said, he then goes on to call MX5nut a troll..

You must have missed the numerous off topic posts elsewhere in the thread. Likewise, I’ve not tried to misrepresent the opinions of others - that’s mx5nut’s strategy on every thread.

[sidicks]

Ghibli said:

Did you understand my last post?

Do you understand the questions (that you refused to answer)?

[anonymous-user]

sidicks said:

Ghibli said:

Although I very much doubt that you will understand this. The point that I was making was that sidick has managed to argue his way through this thread when he is agreeing with what has been said, he then goes on to call MX5nut a troll..

You must have missed the numerous off topic posts elsewhere in the thread. Likewise, I’ve not tried to misrepresent the opinions of others - that’s mx5nut’s strategy on every thread.

You have obviously missed to your own contribution to this thread.

[sidicks]

Ghibli said:

You have obviously missed to your own contribution to this thread.

I’ve challenged the content of other people. You seem solely focussed on me, rather than what I post!

Should we assume that you condone what other people have written, because you haven’t challenged or commented on it?

Edited by sidicks on Monday 15th January 08:35

[anonymous-user]

don'tbesilly said:

Ghibli said:

don'tbesilly said:

Ghibli said:

don'tbesilly said:

Mines bigger than yours

No its not

Yes it is


It isn't

it s really bigger straight up

No no no

I'm the dude
No I'm not

Waffle

Ghibli said:

More waffle

Extreme waffle

waffle on the dancefloor

don'tbesilly said:

What a waffler
Its deffo bigger

NO yes no

Ghibli said:

don'tbesilly said:

waffling all over the world

nananananana

I think thats a fair assessment of recent posts. They make my posts look intelligent

Meanwhile the UKIP leader is splitting with the woman and it will all be alright (i split wit mah hoe but i is ghon be stayin on as leader)

[don'tbesilly]

Ghibli said:

don'tbesilly said:

Are you going to answer them?

Did you understand my last post?

Your last post was irrelevant to what you originally wrote and irrelevant to my subsequent response to what you originally wrote.

Can you answer the two questions originally asked or not? I suspect the latter, but you're welcome to confirm either way.

The two original questions:

Can you name one known UKIP supporter in this thread?

Of the 216 posts in this thread, can you quote one where the poster has supported the texts sent by the vacuous bint, and which sidicks has subsequently gone on to defend?

[PurpleMoonlight]

techiedave said:

Meanwhile the UKIP leader is splitting with the woman and it will all be alright (i split wit mah hoe but i is ghon be stayin on as leader)

Thinking with the big brain at last huh.

[anonymous-user]

irocfan said:

is now like a schoolyard.

It’s been like that for quite a time and par for the course these days on PH unfortunately.

[bitchstewie]

irocfan said:

Hi mods - any chance this bh session can be shut down? Gone waaaay off topic and is now like a schoolyard.

Sadly I agree, which is a bit of a stshow as the person who posted it as it was news (vs. the usual "sir he started it sir" ste).

[PurpleMoonlight]

Bolton in Sky news at the moment.

Marney has been suspended as a member of UKIP.

[rs1952]

To make a change from the primary school payground banter we've had 24 hours of:

IroningMan said:

If we had switched to a PR system when Cleggo pushed for it...

This has nbeen Liberal party policy since at least WW2 and Clegg just happened to be the leader when the chance of a change came up, so you can't realy put the "bame" on him.

But having said that, the policy has always relied in the backgrround on the electorate choosing one of the three major parties or the nationalists where applicable. Nobody ever thought for one minute that the Monster Raving Loony Party would rebrand itself in purple and actually get people voting for them in decent numbers.

I was a supporter of the idea of PR for many years, but ironically since the rise of purple army I'm very glad the country didn't vote in the way that the LDs wanted.

As streaky used to say on here, be careful what you wish for...

[anonymous-user]

UKIP HQ this morning -

[The Dangerous Elk]

[quote=Breadvan72]UKIP HQ this morning -

Breadvan this morning

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBdnyrzq96s

[anonymous-user]

A simple question, Dangerous Elk - do you deplore the racism expressed by Ms Marney?

[The Dangerous Elk]

Breadvan72 said:

A simple question, Dangerous Elk - do you deplore the racism expressed by Ms Marney?

She is a disgusting person, as you are for asking me that.

[Alpinestars]

sidicks said:

PurpleMoonlight said:

Your modus operandi is to play the innocent when challenged.

Some might say you are passive aggressive, I just see you as a bully.

Stop bullying me!

In this thread alone there are numerous off topic / aggressive posts, yet you only choose to comment on mine (and ignore the thread topic)?

Why is that?

Edited by sidicks on Monday 15th January 07:36

Isn't that exactly what you did in your first post on this thread?

[sidicks]

rs1952 said:

This has nbeen Liberal party policy since at least WW2 and Clegg just happened to be the leader when the chance of a change came up, so you can't realy put the "bame" on him.

But having said that, the policy has always relied in the backgrround on the electorate choosing one of the three major parties or the nationalists where applicable. Nobody ever thought for one minute that the Monster Raving Loony Party would rebrand itself in purple and actually get people voting for them in decent numbers.

I was a supporter of the idea of PR for many years, but ironically since the rise of purple army I'm very glad the country didn't vote in the way that the LDs wanted.

As streaky used to say on here, be careful what you wish for...

Looking at the election results it seems that plenty of UKIP votes in the past have purely been about supporting an EU referendum, as evidenced by the massive fall in support at the last election once the Brexit vote has been achieved and the electorate went back to their traditional parties.

It seems unlikely that, now the vote has occurred, that UKIP will be particularly relevant going forward.

[sidicks]

Alpinestars said:

Isn't that exactly what you did in your first post on this thread?

My first post was to comment on another individual’s inciteful (but not insightful), off topic post.