EDL boss Tommy Robinson again proves his stupidity
Discussion
b
hstewie said:
hstewie said:gaseous clay said:
Paging mybrainhurts. Opinions? More MSM slurs I guess?
Open your eyes I don't have the time to explain it to you but if you ignore the MSM enlightenment can be found 
I’m not a Tommy supporter, but ...............
Whenever he does something wrong it’s the MSM’s fault
When it’s current news that he’s done something else wrong, roll over and play dead
Always go back to him personally hunting down the grooming gangs and singlehandedly ensuring they all faced prosecution. Tell everyone he’s a crusader for children. If someone raises other paedophile rings that he has shown no interest in then either deny all knowledge of said rings, or state that it’s something to do with everyone else being snowflake, libtard, lefty, pinko limey scum who eat babies themselves.
Never, ever let the truth get in the way of your defence of a man that you “don’t have any sympathy with / allegiance to / support for”
If all else fails, call them a “sheeple” tell them to “open their eyes”, but provide absolutely no evidence to support those statements and always ignore overwhelming evidence that he is no more than a racist, a thug, a grifter and a many times convicted criminal
All of the above helps if you can:
shave your head,
If over 35 have a massive beer belly and wear a sleeveless t-shirt to show off your Adonis like physique
If under 35 be as skinny as possible, ideally to the extent of malnourishment, wear Burberry, or a cheap eBay copy, especially a baseball cap
Have as many tattoos as possible, preferably with the Union Jack and knights in armour
Be unable to spell. Use words like “are” instead of “our”, such as “they stowul are jobz”
Be unable to string more than four words together, excluding expletives, or repeating the same word.
LF5335 said:
The How to support Tommy Robinson guide for Dummies:
I’m not a Tommy supporter, but ...............
Whenever he does something wrong it’s the MSM’s fault
When it’s current news that he’s done something else wrong, roll over and play dead
Always go back to him personally hunting down the grooming gangs and singlehandedly ensuring they all faced prosecution. Tell everyone he’s a crusader for children. If someone raises other paedophile rings that he has shown no interest in then either deny all knowledge of said rings, or state that it’s something to do with everyone else being snowflake, libtard, lefty, pinko limey scum who eat babies themselves.
Never, ever let the truth get in the way of your defence of a man that you “don’t have any sympathy with / allegiance to / support for”
If all else fails, call them a “sheeple” tell them to “open their eyes”, but provide absolutely no evidence to support those statements and always ignore overwhelming evidence that he is no more than a racist, a thug, a grifter and a many times convicted criminal
All of the above helps if you can:
shave your head,
If over 35 have a massive beer belly and wear a sleeveless t-shirt to show off your Adonis like physique
If under 35 be as skinny as possible, ideally to the extent of malnourishment, wear Burberry, or a cheap eBay copy, especially a baseball cap
Have as many tattoos as possible, preferably with the Union Jack and knights in armour
Be unable to spell. Use words like “are” instead of “our”, such as “they stowul are jobz”
Be unable to string more than four words together, excluding expletives, or repeating the same word.
Fair summary.I’m not a Tommy supporter, but ...............
Whenever he does something wrong it’s the MSM’s fault
When it’s current news that he’s done something else wrong, roll over and play dead
Always go back to him personally hunting down the grooming gangs and singlehandedly ensuring they all faced prosecution. Tell everyone he’s a crusader for children. If someone raises other paedophile rings that he has shown no interest in then either deny all knowledge of said rings, or state that it’s something to do with everyone else being snowflake, libtard, lefty, pinko limey scum who eat babies themselves.
Never, ever let the truth get in the way of your defence of a man that you “don’t have any sympathy with / allegiance to / support for”
If all else fails, call them a “sheeple” tell them to “open their eyes”, but provide absolutely no evidence to support those statements and always ignore overwhelming evidence that he is no more than a racist, a thug, a grifter and a many times convicted criminal
All of the above helps if you can:
shave your head,
If over 35 have a massive beer belly and wear a sleeveless t-shirt to show off your Adonis like physique
If under 35 be as skinny as possible, ideally to the extent of malnourishment, wear Burberry, or a cheap eBay copy, especially a baseball cap
Have as many tattoos as possible, preferably with the Union Jack and knights in armour
Be unable to spell. Use words like “are” instead of “our”, such as “they stowul are jobz”
Be unable to string more than four words together, excluding expletives, or repeating the same word.
Do you think there is a correlation between the racism of TR / SYL and of his supporters?
Perhaps a venn diagram maybe of use.
1602Mark said:
Countdown said:
He likes to accuse a lot of people of being paedophiles etc.
Unless they're EDL members of course, like Richard Price or Leigh McMillan, in which case he'll stand by them or at the very least play down their offences. Tommy uncovered the bad paedophiles (brown people).
Tommy sticks by the good paedophiles (white people) cos he's loyal to his mates. Conclusion - Tommy is great.
If only people had the balls to say "I'm racist too; that's why I support Tommy Robinson"
bhstewie said:
hstewie said:kevinon said:
If only people had the balls to say "I'm racist too; that's why I support Tommy Robinson"
There's a really cunning clever get out to that."Islam is not a race".
Just ask the people who've been convicted of racially aggravated offences how that one worked out for them.
DeepEnd said:
Interesting that they have the balls to support him; and SYL has the 'balls' to go around (with lots of his mates as back up) to a journos house and threaten them - but they don't have the balls to admit they are just racist.
I have no love for this horrible little cretin who can’t live with just one name. But from what I’ve heard he didn’t threaten anyone - certainly not in a way that broke the law. The police have instead used a civil order to wind him in. This has been approved without him or a lawyer being present. And it curtails many of his civil liberties.
As much as I don’t like me lotsofnames, I have a problem with that. If he isn’t breaking criminal law then it should have nothing to do with the police. And whilst it seems unlikely... what happens when i journalist or someone we like is closed down in this way?
He is now no longer allowed to write about that person or her partner. Because he went to her house and because he said he might reveal something (which is almost certainly a lie). I reckon daily mail/the sun journalists do that all the time (I’m not calling lotsofnames a journalist). It’s a slippery slope if you ask me.
milkround said:
But from what I’ve heard he didn’t threaten anyone - certainly not in a way that broke the law.
From what I've read he drove around to a Journalists house with a mate, banged on the door, shouted at him to come out so "they could sort things out" whilst his mate used the horn repeatedly and told neighbours/onlookers that "a paedophile lives there".That seems pretty threatening to me.
The courts make lots of restrictive orders based on the civil threshold.
'Stalking' is under the umbrella of harassment (which we've had since 1997) which feature civil injunctions.
Nothing new.
'Stalking' is under the umbrella of harassment (which we've had since 1997) which feature civil injunctions.
Nothing new.
milkround said:
But from what I’ve heard he didn’t threaten anyone...
First post on the same page said:
"ENGLISH Defence League founder Tommy Robinson threatened to falsely accuse a journalist’s partner of being a paedophile in a bid to squash a negative story about him, a court has heard."
milkround said:
DeepEnd said:
Interesting that they have the balls to support him; and SYL has the 'balls' to go around (with lots of his mates as back up) to a journos house and threaten them - but they don't have the balls to admit they are just racist.
I have no love for this horrible little cretin who can’t live with just one name. But from what I’ve heard he didn’t threaten anyone - certainly not in a way that broke the law. The police have instead used a civil order to wind him in. This has been approved without him or a lawyer being present. And it curtails many of his civil liberties.
As much as I don’t like me lotsofnames, I have a problem with that. If he isn’t breaking criminal law then it should have nothing to do with the police. And whilst it seems unlikely... what happens when i journalist or someone we like is closed down in this way?
He is now no longer allowed to write about that person or her partner. Because he went to her house and because he said he might reveal something (which is almost certainly a lie). I reckon daily mail/the sun journalists do that all the time (I’m not calling lotsofnames a journalist). It’s a slippery slope if you ask me.
bhstewie said:
hstewie said:kevinon said:
If only people had the balls to say "I'm racist too; that's why I support Tommy Robinson"
There's a really cunning clever get out to that."Islam is not a race".
Just ask the people who've been convicted of racially aggravated offences how that one worked out for them.
R Mutt said:
It was pointed out the issue was raised by others before SYL's campaigns which doesn't invalidate my statement that the authorities ignored it.
A five-year investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) found that the Rotherham police ignored the sexual abuse of children for decades for fear of increasing "racial tensions".
Anything further to add on the fact that suspects may be under more intense scrutiny, or ignored on the basis of race?
My 2nd quote refers to the hijacking of protests such as one might do with an underlying racial or anti police motive in mind for example, rather than focus on the crime itself. SYL or BLM or radical feminists don't change Asian grooming gangs, or police brutality of the murder of women. I can only assume the reason you've asked me to comment on crimes to my knowledge hitherto absent from this thread is because you're guilty of the bias I refer to in selectively using activists with ulterior motives to discredit a cause and wish to deflect on that to me. I'm sorry I went off topic and discussed the nuances surrounding his raison d'être and parallels with other forms of activism instead of simply reiterating his stupidity. Although I'm really not sure how you exist on discussion forums if that's the way your mind works. Presumably because you're addicted to the arguments you draw other members in to by your incredible logical leaps
So many words. So much waffle.A five-year investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) found that the Rotherham police ignored the sexual abuse of children for decades for fear of increasing "racial tensions".
Anything further to add on the fact that suspects may be under more intense scrutiny, or ignored on the basis of race?
My 2nd quote refers to the hijacking of protests such as one might do with an underlying racial or anti police motive in mind for example, rather than focus on the crime itself. SYL or BLM or radical feminists don't change Asian grooming gangs, or police brutality of the murder of women. I can only assume the reason you've asked me to comment on crimes to my knowledge hitherto absent from this thread is because you're guilty of the bias I refer to in selectively using activists with ulterior motives to discredit a cause and wish to deflect on that to me. I'm sorry I went off topic and discussed the nuances surrounding his raison d'être and parallels with other forms of activism instead of simply reiterating his stupidity. Although I'm really not sure how you exist on discussion forums if that's the way your mind works. Presumably because you're addicted to the arguments you draw other members in to by your incredible logical leaps
Edited by R Mutt on Friday 19th March 10:17
He has a point, the refusal of police forces to approach crimes which could make them appear to profile racially are a great motivator to the likes of TR.
My opinion is that the police should be forced to be racially blind, any crime should be pursued regardless of the race or religion of the suspect(s).
My opinion is that the police should be forced to be racially blind, any crime should be pursued regardless of the race or religion of the suspect(s).
)Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff