EDL boss Tommy Robinson again proves his stupidity
Discussion
stitched said:
He has a point, the refusal of police forces to approach crimes which could make them appear to profile racially are a great motivator to the likes of TR.
My opinion is that the police should be forced to be racially blind, any crime should be pursued regardless of the race or religion of the suspect(s).
I don't think anybody could disagree with that.My opinion is that the police should be forced to be racially blind, any crime should be pursued regardless of the race or religion of the suspect(s).
I think the point is that TR didn't do anything to achieve that. In fact he's seemingly quite happy to ignore similar crimes if they're committed by his own supporters. He's not some kind of champion for the victims of grooming gangs. He's just pretending to be, as an excuse for being a racist
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
Countdown said:
stitched said:
He has a point, the refusal of police forces to approach crimes which could make them appear to profile racially are a great motivator to the likes of TR.
My opinion is that the police should be forced to be racially blind, any crime should be pursued regardless of the race or religion of the suspect(s).
I don't think anybody could disagree with that.My opinion is that the police should be forced to be racially blind, any crime should be pursued regardless of the race or religion of the suspect(s).
I think the point is that TR didn't do anything to achieve that. In fact he's seemingly quite happy to ignore similar crimes if they're committed by his own supporters. He's not some kind of champion for the victims of grooming gangs. He's just pretending to be, as an excuse for being a racist
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
Anti-capitalist environmentalists
Anti-police anarchists
Anti-BLM racists
Anti-trans feminists
Anti-halal islamophobes
Anti-zionist antisemites
People need to be careful when attributing all these causes to some ism or other unless you can be sure all those you support are with honest intentions. If support for them is dismissed as a disguise for an ism, then only the 'ists' are going to be vocal, undermining the real issue.
This also enables those who claim discrimination when called out on their actions and perpetuates the sort of political sensitivity that dissuades authorities from investigating crimes.
Of course things are brushed under the carpet for other reasons, such as Savile's status and connections to the Conservative government but then you wouldn't call it a smear and undermine anyone who raised the alarm if that was purely for political reasons, although that was the claim made by many in defence of Jeremy Corbyn. So how you do view this situation when it's the other way round with politics defending racism?
kevinon said:
I really want to ask the TR supporters on here a question, in the style of Mrs Merton.
"So, what first attracted you to the racist, Tommy Robinson?"
Do you want a real answer"So, what first attracted you to the racist, Tommy Robinson?"
Or do you want to bounce up and down screaming WACIST?
As the real answer is he listened to their concerns without labelling them as thick racists
Evanivitch said:
tight fart said:
Why do the press always have to put his previous name, they never do that with Elton John?
Stephen is his actual, current name you plonker. tight fart said:
Evanivitch said:
Stephen is his actual, current name you plonker.
You sound like one of his supporters, sorry if I offended you or your hero.Quisling said:
kevinon said:
I really want to ask the TR supporters on here a question, in the style of Mrs Merton.
"So, what first attracted you to the racist, Tommy Robinson?"
Do you want a real answer"So, what first attracted you to the racist, Tommy Robinson?"
Or do you want to bounce up and down screaming WACIST?
As the real answer is he listened to their concerns without labelling them as thick racists
If you believe people really do bounce up and down and scream WACIST do you think this is some sort of guarantee that the person being accused ISN’T racist? If so, maybe stick with the Just William books.
Roman Rhodes said:
Quisling said:
kevinon said:
I really want to ask the TR supporters on here a question, in the style of Mrs Merton.
"So, what first attracted you to the racist, Tommy Robinson?"
Do you want a real answer"So, what first attracted you to the racist, Tommy Robinson?"
Or do you want to bounce up and down screaming WACIST?
As the real answer is he listened to their concerns without labelling them as thick racists
If you believe people really do bounce up and down and scream WACIST do you think this is some sort of guarantee that the person being accused ISN’T racist? If so, maybe stick with the Just William books.
Anyone who questions anything other than completely open borders is a thick racist
And THICK RACISTS should be ignored as they voted LEAVE and love Nigel Farage
Quisling said:
Don’t forget
Anyone who questions anything other than completely open borders is a thick racist
And THICK RACISTS should be ignored as they voted LEAVE and love Nigel Farage
They are also a failure in life and apparently worry that an unskilled uneducated individual from the third world might nip in and take their 6 figure salary job !!Anyone who questions anything other than completely open borders is a thick racist
And THICK RACISTS should be ignored as they voted LEAVE and love Nigel Farage
mrporsche said:
Quisling said:
Don’t forget
Anyone who questions anything other than completely open borders is a thick racist
And THICK RACISTS should be ignored as they voted LEAVE and love Nigel Farage
They are also a failure in life and apparently worry that an unskilled uneducated individual from the third world might nip in and take their 6 figure salary job !!Anyone who questions anything other than completely open borders is a thick racist
And THICK RACISTS should be ignored as they voted LEAVE and love Nigel Farage
Countdown said:
JuanCarlosFandango said:
Just the anger the bloke causes from a certain type of person is quite impressive.
I think you're confusing anger with contempt. The man's a turd and so are his supporters.YEP he has a point there
Should excluded from your nice polite world?
Quisling said:
mrporsche said:
Quisling said:
Don’t forget
Anyone who questions anything other than completely open borders is a thick racist
And THICK RACISTS should be ignored as they voted LEAVE and love Nigel Farage
They are also a failure in life and apparently worry that an unskilled uneducated individual from the third world might nip in and take their 6 figure salary job !!Anyone who questions anything other than completely open borders is a thick racist
And THICK RACISTS should be ignored as they voted LEAVE and love Nigel Farage
Quisling said:
And how about bottom dwelling scum like me who listen to him and think
YEP he has a point there
Should excluded from your nice polite world?
The bottom-dwelling scum who listen to him aren't a new phenomena. I'm old enough to remember the same bottom-dwelling scum taking part in NF (and later BNP) marches. It might be a different coating of glitter but the underlying turds are still the same. IME during the 80s/90s/00s the Bottom dwelling Scum were ostracised by society. That's precisely why they pretend to care about grooming gangs, to try to make themselves less contemptible and hope that people don't look too closely at their underlying motives.YEP he has a point there
Should excluded from your nice polite world?
Just so we're clear, social media posts by busybody neighbours sharing photos of black/ Asian/ Eastern Europe men who they suspect of a range of crimes from attempted kidnapping to burglary are entirely valid, even if it's xenophobia that arouses their suspicion, because there may genuinely be a crime involved, and they can be denounced for their racism entirely independently of the merits of their report?
Countdown said:
Quisling said:
And how about bottom dwelling scum like me who listen to him and think
YEP he has a point there
Should excluded from your nice polite world?
The bottom-dwelling scum who listen to him aren't a new phenomena. I'm old enough to remember the same bottom-dwelling scum taking part in NF (and later BNP) marches. It might be a different coating of glitter but the underlying turds are still the same. IME during the 80s/90s/00s the Bottom dwelling Scum were ostracised by society. That's precisely why they pretend to care about grooming gangs, to try to make themselves less contemptible and hope that people don't look too closely at their underlying motives.YEP he has a point there
Should excluded from your nice polite world?
We should just BAN them from having a voice
And we can just pile everyone who sayes anything negative about anyone who isn't white into the same group of racist scum
And questioning practises from other cultures is also racist
R Mutt said:
Just so we're clear, social media posts by busybody neighbours sharing photos of black/ Asian/ Eastern Europe men who they suspect of a range of crimes from attempted kidnapping to burglary are entirely valid, even if it's xenophobia that arouses their suspicion, because there may genuinely be a crime involved, and they can be denounced for their racism entirely independently of the merits of their report?
Do you actually ever make a point with these roundabout posts? You seem to enjoy saying lots without actually saying anything. Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff