I don't want my human rights torn up - letting terrorism win
Discussion
rscott said:
Well we can't send them to Hungary - they've banned several members of Britain First/Knight's Templar from entering that country.. On national security grounds 
Delicious irony, isn't it?Nick Griffin and Jim Dowson - people who've complained bitterly about how the EU means we can't keep foreigners out of the country... only to take advantage of those very same rules, and then be deported. Not only hypocrites, but clueless and wrong.
Comrade Steptoe said:
Precisely. He got back into the UK by marrying an EU citizen. Exactly the sort of abuse that TooManyHandwringLiberals has laughably trying to claim doesn't happen. Duh.
Do you realise what you're saying? How on earth is marrying an EU citizen 'abuse'?Should 'foreigners' not be allowed to marry EU citizens?
Also, how did Kahn welcome 'Muslim murderers'? I don't think any murderers are being welcomed are they?
I appreciate what you are getting at but you need to look at the practicalities of what you're saying.
Comrade Steptoe said:
Photoshopped ?! LMAO !
How about you educate yourself sonny before you mug yourself off any further.
http://www.swlondoner.co.uk/refugees-welcome-tooti...
Sorry that you find the truth so inconvenient.
Sonny? Stay classy.How about you educate yourself sonny before you mug yourself off any further.
http://www.swlondoner.co.uk/refugees-welcome-tooti...
Sorry that you find the truth so inconvenient.
So, returning to the question, which I think you're avoiding because you don't have anywhere to go with it, in what way is Sadiq khan responsible for allowing Khuram Butt into the UK?
Comrade Steptoe said:
Eddie Strohacker said:
A grown up? maybe someone who can offer more than a photoshopped picture as conclusive proof that this guy is personally responsible for that thing?
Photoshopped ?! LMAO !How about you educate yourself sonny before you mug yourself off any further.
http://www.swlondoner.co.uk/refugees-welcome-tooti...
Sorry that you find the truth so inconvenient.
Comrade Steptoe said:
Precisely. He got back into the UK by marrying an EU citizen. Exactly the sort of abuse that TooManyHandwringLiberals has laughably trying to claim doesn't happen. Duh.
Odd, I don't remember making that claim. Perhaps you'd be so kind as to remind me of where I did that?'course, the UK didn't have to let him in... Although there's no real border checks between the UK and Ireland - not through anything to do with the EU, but through the Common Travel Area, which goes back to Irish independence in 1923.
Nor did the UK have to let the Italian in. Looks like that may have been an entirely home-grown dropped b
k in not acting on the information that leaving the EU will make harder for us to access.vonuber said:
Ok, so for which regular poster is Comrade Steptoe the alternative account?
They should just post this stuff under their regular account rather than hiding.
Fairly transparent isnt it. 'Lifelong petrolhead' with a two month old account, 80 posts and none at all car based all about political issues.They should just post this stuff under their regular account rather than hiding.
p1stonhead said:
Comrade Steptoe said:
Eddie Strohacker said:
A grown up? maybe someone who can offer more than a photoshopped picture as conclusive proof that this guy is personally responsible for that thing?
Photoshopped ?! LMAO !How about you educate yourself sonny before you mug yourself off any further.
http://www.swlondoner.co.uk/refugees-welcome-tooti...
Sorry that you find the truth so inconvenient.
Edit. Picture removed from reply.
[quote=p1stonhead]
How do you visualise refugees? Does the below crop up at all in your head?
Personally, no. I prefer to look at the facts behind the picture, rather than have a knee jerk liberal reaction.
The truth behind this tragedy was that this Syrian family had been living safely in Turkey for the previous 3 years. However, because his father decided he wanted to get some free dental treatment in the bountiful EU, not to mention that he found Turkey a bit stingy on the benefits front, he decided to risk his families life by sticking them on a boat.
The outcome of his decision is clear.
How do you visualise refugees? Does the below crop up at all in your head?
Personally, no. I prefer to look at the facts behind the picture, rather than have a knee jerk liberal reaction.
The truth behind this tragedy was that this Syrian family had been living safely in Turkey for the previous 3 years. However, because his father decided he wanted to get some free dental treatment in the bountiful EU, not to mention that he found Turkey a bit stingy on the benefits front, he decided to risk his families life by sticking them on a boat.
The outcome of his decision is clear.
p1stonhead said:
vonuber said:
Ok, so for which regular poster is Comrade Steptoe the alternative account?
They should just post this stuff under their regular account rather than hiding.
Fairly transparent isnt it. 'Lifelong petrolhead' with a two month old account, 80 posts and none at all car based all about political issues.They should just post this stuff under their regular account rather than hiding.
Two-month account, no posts before this Monday - and his first posts show as being from "David-3y21c", before he changed the account name.
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Eddie Strohacker said:
Sonny? Stay classy.
So, returning to the question, which I think you're avoiding because you don't have anywhere to go with it, in what way is Sadiq khan responsible for allowing Khuram Butt into the UK?
So, you don't wish to apologise for accusing me of posting a photoshopped picture then. Ho hum.So, returning to the question, which I think you're avoiding because you don't have anywhere to go with it, in what way is Sadiq khan responsible for allowing Khuram Butt into the UK?
Have another try. And while you are apologising for that, you can also apologise for attempting to misrepresent me. Unless you can quote me saying that Citizen Khan is responsible for allowing Butt into the UK? I think you'll find it's another one of your little fictions.
Sonny.
plasticpig said:
wc98 said:
is somali a race then ? i certainly do not believe i am superior to any other person on this planet. would you like to live in somalia ? if not ,why not ?
Yes Somali is a race. p1stonhead said:
Fairly transparent isnt it. 'Lifelong petrolhead' with a two month old account, 80 posts and none at all car based all about political issues.
Oh, I do apologise. I missed the rule that said you must be a member for 10 years, and have posted 759 times on Pagini piston rings before being allowed to post on here.Comrade Steptoe said:
Eddie Strohacker said:
Sonny? Stay classy.
So, returning to the question, which I think you're avoiding because you don't have anywhere to go with it, in what way is Sadiq khan responsible for allowing Khuram Butt into the UK?
So, you don't wish to apologise for accusing me of posting a photoshopped picture then. Ho hum.So, returning to the question, which I think you're avoiding because you don't have anywhere to go with it, in what way is Sadiq khan responsible for allowing Khuram Butt into the UK?
Have another try. And while you are apologising for that, you can also apologise for attempting to misrepresent me. Unless you can quote me saying that Citizen Khan is responsible for allowing Butt into the UK? I think you'll find it's another one of your little fictions.
Sonny.
Comrade Steptoe said:
He welcomes all refugees, so by definition he welcomes the terrorists amongst them- what more evidence do you want?
Comrade Steptoe said:
So, you don't wish to apologise for accusing me of posting a photoshopped picture then. Ho hum.
Have another try. And while you are apologising for that, you can also apologise for attempting to misrepresent me. Unless you can quote me saying that Citizen Khan is responsible for allowing Butt into the UK? I think you'll find it's another one of your little fictions.
Sonny.
It wasn't photoshopped? OK, sorry about that.Have another try. And while you are apologising for that, you can also apologise for attempting to misrepresent me. Unless you can quote me saying that Citizen Khan is responsible for allowing Butt into the UK? I think you'll find it's another one of your little fictions.
Sonny.
So, returning to the question, which I think you're avoiding because you don't have anywhere to go with it, in what way is Sadiq khan responsible for allowing Khuram Butt into the UK?
Comrade Steptoe said:
No, I don't like so called peaceful ,integrated Muslims that welcome their fellow Muslims who murder innocent people.
Comrade Steptoe said:
p1stonhead said:
Fairly transparent isnt it. 'Lifelong petrolhead' with a two month old account, 80 posts and none at all car based all about political issues.
Oh, I do apologise. I missed the rule that said you must be a member for 10 years, and have posted 759 times on Pagini piston rings before being allowed to post on here.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff