Jo Swinson

[Lindun]

don'tbesilly said:

So what you wrote was distasteful and it got you removed from the thread, and you are boasting that what was written made someone break into tears and he ran away?
Is internet bullying something you specialise in?

Who was this poster, you never covered that part in your response?

I’ll let this guy reply

ash73 said:

Here come the White Knights.

[Lindun]

Nickgnome said:

ash73 said:

Lindun said:

Back on topic. Do you really think that discussing the looks of politician is relevant to her ability as a politician?

People can discuss whatever they like. It's a fking car forum stop being so bloody miserable.

That is incorrect as I’m sure you realise. Certain topics and opinions are should be off limits.

Edited as this seems to be more accurate.

[anonymous-user]

Lindun said:

anonymous said:

[redacted]

As a politician? She’s in her infancy as leader of the LibDems and has played things reasonably well by being almost invisible for the last few weeks. She needs to step up and start being a bit more vocal now as she’s got a great chance to make her party relevant again.

Or did you mean do i fancy her? I’m not at school any more so don't act like a giggling teenager unlike many on here.

As a politician, I meant.
My opinion? Next GE, she's gone.
What qualities and experience do you think she brings to the party?

[don'tbesilly]

Lindun said:

don'tbesilly said:

So what you wrote was distasteful and it got you removed from the thread, and you are boasting that what was written made someone break into tears and he ran away?
Is internet bullying something you specialise in?

Who was this poster, you never covered that part in your response?

I’ll let this guy reply

ash73 said:

Here come the White Knights.

Has ash removed that post or is it one you edited yourself?

You're not going to name the poster you bullied then?

[Lindun]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

As much as those are valid questions the reality is that they don’t matter. This election will be fought as a single issue and that means people will vote according to that and little else. As such the LibDems will acquire votes from all over without having to do much more than what they’re currently doing.

It is that simple IMO

[Lindun]

don'tbesilly said:

Has ash removed that post or is it one you edited yourself?

You're not going to name the poster you bullied then?

13:17 today.

Not getting into any more discussion around this as you’re clearly trying to and failing to set some sort of Borisesque übertrap.

[anonymous-user]

Lindun said:

anonymous said:

[redacted]

As much as those are valid questions the reality is that they don’t matter. This election will be fought as a single issue and that means people will vote according to that and little else. As such the LibDems will acquire votes from all over without having to do much more than what they’re currently doing.

It is that simple IMO

Yes I agree it is is simple, it's very shallow too. I do think this could ruin the Lib Dems in the end though as protest parties don't last long.

[NITO]

I found her blue top very fetching and she seems very nice...

[Lindun]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Only time will tell on that. They were dead in their feet after the 2015 election and recorded a little in 2017. This time round might put them back where they were, or kill them at the next subsequent election. What this one is likely to do is strengthen them.

[don'tbesilly]

Lindun said:

don'tbesilly said:

Has ash removed that post or is it one you edited yourself?

You're not going to name the poster you bullied then?

13:17 today.

Not getting into any more discussion around this as you’re clearly trying to and failing to set some sort of Borisesque übertrap.

I just found what you'd written, how old are you?

You say a mod removed it yet it's still visible because others quoted it, I suspect it was you that removed it because it was so juvenile.

[NITO]

If there were to be a next election any time soon, I think she would clean up with the remain vote, combined with SNP would be something to rival the Tories.

[Puggit]

NITO said:

If there were to be a next election any time soon, I think she would clean up with the remain vote, combined with SNP would be something to rival the Tories.

100/1 for the next government to be a LD minority government. That seems extremely generous.

[NITO]

Probably, maybe lib lab snp then

[Lindun]

Puggit said:

100/1 for the next government to be a LD minority government. That seems extremely generous.

I can’t see them being a minority government, but I can see them holding the key to any coalition. It’ll be interesting to see if they hold sufficient seats to be able to form a majority coalition with both of the main parties though

[Lindun]

don'tbesilly said:

I just found what you'd written, how old are you?

You say a mod removed it yet it's still visible because others quoted it, I suspect it was you that removed it because it was so juvenile.

Old enough to let things go after a few hours.

[Amateurish]

Lindun said:

Puggit said:

100/1 for the next government to be a LD minority government. That seems extremely generous.

I can’t see them being a minority government, but I can see them holding the key to any coalition. It’ll be interesting to see if they hold sufficient seats to be able to form a majority coalition with both of the main parties though

The wouldn't go back into coalition with the Tories under any circumstances.

[Lindun]

Amateurish said:

The wouldn't go back into coalition with the Tories under any circumstances.

It’d be interesting to see. They’ve ruled out Labour with Corbyn in charge too. That would either mean they make some fairly serious demands that will need to be met, or someone forms a minority government, as it’s unlikely anyone else would have sufficient seats to form a coalition.

It’s all hypotheticals anyway. I’m being bombarded by Tory newsletters banging on about not wanting an election, but asking for help in securing one, alongside donating money.

[don'tbesilly]

Lindun said:

don'tbesilly said:

I just found what you'd written, how old are you?

You say a mod removed it yet it's still visible because others quoted it, I suspect it was you that removed it because it was so juvenile.

Old enough to let things go after a few hours.

I can see why the post got removed along with you from the thread, describing what you do along with how it impacts on you whilst writing a post is something best kept to oneself

[Sway]

Digga said:

Lindun said:

This thread is a disgrace. If it shows the calibre of posters on PH, then it’s a sad state of affairs.

To be fair, the term double bagger can apply to any individual - does not need to be female - so it's all nice and fluffy and BLT. I'm totally sure you can use it without losing virtue signal points.

Have to say, for me a double bagger meant not risking just the one cock bag...

[Amateurish]

Lindun said:

Amateurish said:

The wouldn't go back into coalition with the Tories under any circumstances.

It’d be interesting to see. They’ve ruled out Labour with Corbyn in charge too. That would either mean they make some fairly serious demands that will need to be met, or someone forms a minority government, as it’s unlikely anyone else would have sufficient seats to form a coalition.

It’s all hypotheticals anyway. I’m being bombarded by Tory newsletters banging on about not wanting an election, but asking for help in securing one, alongside donating money.

It would probably mean Corbyn stepping down. I don't think any of the smaller parties would get into bed with Labour while he was leader, he's just too toxic. IMO.