Scottish Referendum / Independence - Vol 2
Discussion
Edinburger said:
WhereamI said:
Edinburger said:
WhereamI said:
Edinburger said:
Scotland is a country, not just a region of the UK
And because Scotland is a country, it is quite outrageous that the Conservatives governed Scotland when only one or two constituencies in the whole of Scotland voted for them.
That's the point.
Politically Scotland is a region of the UK. It has no more status in the context of the UK than Yorkshire does, or the West Midlands or Wales.And because Scotland is a country, it is quite outrageous that the Conservatives governed Scotland when only one or two constituencies in the whole of Scotland voted for them.
That's the point.
Therefore I think most people would recognise Scotland as a country.
BTW Yorkshire has it's own borders, economy, GDP, police forces, public services and so on. No we haven't indulged in our own parliament and we are happy with our status as a UK region.
Edinburger said:
Isn't this what people have been saying all along? These services will cost, and whether Scotland would be able to afford it without either taxing heavily, or cutting spending in other areas? Edinburger said:
Yep its a bad sign when the public sector and the labour party say you are spending too muchAnd they aren't my prayers
My prayers are that the SNP and the independence lot stop believing in the magic money tree.
TheHeretic said:
Edinburger said:
Isn't this what people have been saying all along? These services will cost, and whether Scotland would be able to afford it without either taxing heavily, or cutting spending in other areas? The exception is University fees, although the question there is how large a higher education sector we need. It only became necessary to charge fees because the sector grew to such an extent that it became unaffordable without, and that's due to this concept of over 50% of the population going to university. But that's another debate.
WhereamI said:
The exception is University fees, although the question there is how large a higher education sector we need. It only became necessary to charge fees because the sector grew to such an extent that it became unaffordable without, and that's due to this concept of over 50% of the population going to university. But that's another debate.
Free university will give me a HUGE laugh if we get independenceCurrently in scotland we can legally charge english student coming up to a scottish university
If we become independent then under EU rules then we must allow english students to use scottish universities for free
I'll laugh my cock off when that little penny drops with the anti-english morons
thinfourth2 said:
WhereamI said:
The exception is University fees, although the question there is how large a higher education sector we need. It only became necessary to charge fees because the sector grew to such an extent that it became unaffordable without, and that's due to this concept of over 50% of the population going to university. But that's another debate.
Free university will give me a HUGE laugh if we get independenceCurrently in scotland we can legally charge english student coming up to a scottish university
If we become independent then under EU rules then we must allow english students to use scottish universities for free
I'll laugh my cock off when that little penny drops with the anti-english morons
That said, ISTR there was an article in the Sunday's last weekend where the Students rated the teaching at Edinburgh as distinctly bottom of the pile!
Indeed so, a quick look & here it is
http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/E...
thinfourth2 said:
WhereamI said:
The exception is University fees, although the question there is how large a higher education sector we need. It only became necessary to charge fees because the sector grew to such an extent that it became unaffordable without, and that's due to this concept of over 50% of the population going to university. But that's another debate.
Free university will give me a HUGE laugh if we get independenceCurrently in scotland we can legally charge english student coming up to a scottish university
If we become independent then under EU rules then we must allow english students to use scottish universities for free
I'll laugh my cock off when that little penny drops with the anti-english morons
AstonZagato said:
thinfourth2 said:
WhereamI said:
The exception is University fees, although the question there is how large a higher education sector we need. It only became necessary to charge fees because the sector grew to such an extent that it became unaffordable without, and that's due to this concept of over 50% of the population going to university. But that's another debate.
Free university will give me a HUGE laugh if we get independenceCurrently in scotland we can legally charge english student coming up to a scottish university
If we become independent then under EU rules then we must allow english students to use scottish universities for free
I'll laugh my cock off when that little penny drops with the anti-english morons
That'll please VP
BliarOut said:
AstonZagato said:
thinfourth2 said:
WhereamI said:
The exception is University fees, although the question there is how large a higher education sector we need. It only became necessary to charge fees because the sector grew to such an extent that it became unaffordable without, and that's due to this concept of over 50% of the population going to university. But that's another debate.
Free university will give me a HUGE laugh if we get independenceCurrently in scotland we can legally charge english student coming up to a scottish university
If we become independent then under EU rules then we must allow english students to use scottish universities for free
I'll laugh my cock off when that little penny drops with the anti-english morons
That'll please VP
TheHeretic said:
Edinburger said:
Isn't this what people have been saying all along? These services will cost, and whether Scotland would be able to afford it without either taxing heavily, or cutting spending in other areas? "Were the MSPs aware of that when they launched the policy? I suspect the frank answer is not."
So no-one could predict that we have an aging population, and that in the future we will have more old people eligible for these schemes? Have these people been living in a cave not to be aware of this?
At last the truth. Salmond is a son of a bh who is more concerned with lining his and his cronies pockets than caring a jot about the Scottish people he pretends to represent.
How can the wkers who regularly post on this forum here keep defending their Great Leader
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/iainmartin1/1001...
How can the wkers who regularly post on this forum here keep defending their Great Leader
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/iainmartin1/1001...
isoimp said:
At last the truth. Salmond is a son of a bh who is more concerned with lining his and his cronies pockets than caring a jot about the Scottish people he pretends to represent.
How can the wkers who regularly post on this forum here keep defending their Great Leader
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/iainmartin1/1001...
Ah but they claim he is not the true "great leader". He is just the vehicle to achieving what they want - their interests are, apparently, only temporarily aligned.How can the wkers who regularly post on this forum here keep defending their Great Leader
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/iainmartin1/1001...
Thereafter the "secret" party takes over and a new (and as yet completely unheard of) Great Leader will emerge from the shadows wielding his Claymore & handing out free flags & facepaint for all!
Seems as though he might not be able to afford the free prescriptions & Uni education anymore though!
isoimp said:
At last the truth. Salmond is a son of a bh who is more concerned with lining his and his cronies pockets than caring a jot about the Scottish people he pretends to represent.
How can the wkers who regularly post on this forum here keep defending their Great Leader
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/iainmartin1/1001...
Hmmm. A BLOG in the Torygraph. It simply MUST be 100% accurate... How can the wkers who regularly post on this forum here keep defending their Great Leader
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/iainmartin1/1001...
WhereamI said:
ViperPict said:
Hmmm. A BLOG in the Torygraph. It simply MUST be 100% accurate...
Ah VP we've missed you! So what is wrong with what is being said, care to point out any inaccuracies or are you just going to rolleyes and blame the telegraph?ViperPict said:
For a start, the article's not even about Salmond, only in the indirect sense that he leads the Tory party. Note that AS was not even present in the SP when wee Jimmy Krankie was jeered...
Wait...What? How is that showing the article as inaccurate? And how does it show that he indirectly leads the Tory party?Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff