I don't want my human rights torn up - letting terrorism win
Discussion
rscott said:
Comrade Steptoe - just wondered what attracted you to join Pistonheads? I see you've never posted outside NP&E
When you've been here over a decade you realise there's only so many times you can discuss Ferrari vs Porsche or Manual vs Auto. NP&E is my safe space from all the tribal arguments. 
TooMany2cvs said:
Massively obvious. Obviously, even he recognises his opinions are too embarrassing to be owned up to publicly.
Two-month account, no posts before this Monday - and his first posts show as being from "David-3y21c", before he changed the account name.
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Ooo, I have touched a nerve haven't I? Two-month account, no posts before this Monday - and his first posts show as being from "David-3y21c", before he changed the account name.
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
My original name is as you are aware generated automatically by PH. I then exercised the option to change that name to one of my own choosing. As indeed you appear to have have done, unless Mr "TooManycvs" is your real name of course.
fblm said:
rscott said:
Comrade Steptoe - just wondered what attracted you to join Pistonheads? I see you've never posted outside NP&E
When you've been here over a decade you realise there's only so many times you can discuss Ferrari vs Porsche or Manual vs Auto. NP&E is my safe space from all the tribal arguments. rscott said:
fblm said:
rscott said:
Comrade Steptoe - just wondered what attracted you to join Pistonheads? I see you've never posted outside NP&E
When you've been here over a decade you realise there's only so many times you can discuss Ferrari vs Porsche or Manual vs Auto. NP&E is my safe space from all the tribal arguments. 
Eddie Strohacker said:
Comrade Steptoe said:
So, you don't wish to apologise for accusing me of posting a photoshopped picture then. Ho hum.
Have another try. And while you are apologising for that, you can also apologise for attempting to misrepresent me. Unless you can quote me saying that Citizen Khan is responsible for allowing Butt into the UK? I think you'll find it's another one of your little fictions.
Sonny.
It wasn't photoshopped? OK, sorry about that.Have another try. And while you are apologising for that, you can also apologise for attempting to misrepresent me. Unless you can quote me saying that Citizen Khan is responsible for allowing Butt into the UK? I think you'll find it's another one of your little fictions.
Sonny.
So, returning to the question, which I think you're avoiding because you don't have anywhere to go with it, in what way is Sadiq khan responsible for allowing Khuram Butt into the UK?
Comrade Steptoe said:
No, I don't like so called peaceful ,integrated Muslims that welcome their fellow Muslims who murder innocent people.
Google is your friend, but just to help you, let me give you a really simple example. Because you will probably understand simple.
Bert "welcomed" the postman when he knocked on the door. But he wasn't "responsible" for the postman knocking on the door.
Comrade Steptoe said:
TooMany2cvs said:
Massively obvious. Obviously, even he recognises his opinions are too embarrassing to be owned up to publicly.
Two-month account, no posts before this Monday - and his first posts show as being from "David-3y21c", before he changed the account name.
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
Ooo, I have touched a nerve haven't I? Two-month account, no posts before this Monday - and his first posts show as being from "David-3y21c", before he changed the account name.
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...
My original name is as you are aware generated automatically by PH. I then exercised the option to change that name to one of my own choosing. As indeed you appear to have have done, unless Mr "TooManycvs" is your real name of course.
Comrade Steptoe said:
Eddie Strohacker said:
Comrade Steptoe said:
So, you don't wish to apologise for accusing me of posting a photoshopped picture then. Ho hum.
Have another try. And while you are apologising for that, you can also apologise for attempting to misrepresent me. Unless you can quote me saying that Citizen Khan is responsible for allowing Butt into the UK? I think you'll find it's another one of your little fictions.
Sonny.
It wasn't photoshopped? OK, sorry about that.Have another try. And while you are apologising for that, you can also apologise for attempting to misrepresent me. Unless you can quote me saying that Citizen Khan is responsible for allowing Butt into the UK? I think you'll find it's another one of your little fictions.
Sonny.
So, returning to the question, which I think you're avoiding because you don't have anywhere to go with it, in what way is Sadiq khan responsible for allowing Khuram Butt into the UK?
Comrade Steptoe said:
No, I don't like so called peaceful ,integrated Muslims that welcome their fellow Muslims who murder innocent people.
Google is your friend, but just to help you, let me give you a really simple example. Because you will probably understand simple.
Bert "welcomed" the postman when he knocked on the door. But he wasn't "responsible" for the postman knocking on the door.
rscott said:
Oh dear. Would that be the username you type into the field labelled "Username" when registering on this page ( https://www.pistonheads.com/me/new) ? The one which is blank by default?
Errr...no. The name is clearly random, I did not and would not have chosen such a name.But why so stressed about my username? You don't like my views, fine. I'm not bothered.
p1stonhead said:
You mean Bert 'welcomed' thousands of peaceful postmen to his house and had zero idea that one of them wanted to kill Bert and could never have known that?
Ah, my bad, I didn't make it simple enough for you, obvs.Just Google welcome and responsible, it will help you understand grown up words.
Im not voting for her. Taking away rights of the many in order to be better able to deal with the few terrorists. Both human rights and policing the internet are both things she should stay well clear of.
Im still of the opinion that no politician wants to deal with brexit and we are going to have 10 years of uncertainty and resignations.
Im still of the opinion that no politician wants to deal with brexit and we are going to have 10 years of uncertainty and resignations.
Comrade Steptoe said:
p1stonhead said:
You mean Bert 'welcomed' thousands of peaceful postmen to his house and had zero idea that one of them wanted to kill Bert and could never have known that?
Ah, my bad, I didn't make it simple enough for you, obvs.Just Google welcome and responsible, it will help you understand grown up words.
Comrade Steptoe said:
rscott said:
Oh dear. Would that be the username you type into the field labelled "Username" when registering on this page ( https://www.pistonheads.com/me/new) ? The one which is blank by default?
Errr...no. The name is clearly random, I did not and would not have chosen such a name.But why so stressed about my username? You don't like my views, fine. I'm not bothered.
Comrade Steptoe said:
Nothing to avoid sonny. You are obviously conflating "responsible" with "welcome".
Google is your friend, but just to help you, let me give you a really simple example. Because you will probably understand simple.
Bert "welcomed" the postman when he knocked on the door. But he wasn't "responsible" for the postman knocking on the door.
You can call me sonny all day, it won't bug me Google is your friend, but just to help you, let me give you a really simple example. Because you will probably understand simple.
Bert "welcomed" the postman when he knocked on the door. But he wasn't "responsible" for the postman knocking on the door.
Simple I don't mind either. Some of us are above personal insults, some of us aren't.All I'm trying to do is to get you to answer a straight question & you won't do it. Here's why:
Sadiq Khan is that thing that you see wished for on Pistonheads frequently. He's the antithesis of the murderous western hating Jihadi Muslim, he's someone who grew up on a council estate, got himself an education, grafted his way into a future & then offered himself to the public for election & succeeded in that too.
For a small section of people, that really grates. To those people, there is never enough someone like him could ever do to prove that they are one of us. he's the wrong colour, he's the wrong religion, he's the wrong politics. He's somehow one of them - I have no evidence, I just know it to be true...
He comes up on here very single day quoted out of context, accused of giving succour to terrorists & on & on it goes. The irony is those same people who cannot (rightly too) accept Jihadist Muslims in our midst are the same people who rail against a man who has done more than just about anyone to demonstrate he fits in with this society, so with respect, it's you, not I who has conflated two separate issues. It's you who has him wrong & it's also you and still you who will never, ever concede that you've made an error.
So please, come back with another ad hom, after all, it's all you have.
p1stonhead said:
No you seem to have a problem with him for welcoming people. That one or two went on to do abhorrent things he couldnt have known about is irrelevent to his welcoming isnt it?
You are struggling with words again sonny. The word you wanted wasn't "irrelevant", it was "irresponsible".Foliage said:
Im not voting for her. Taking away rights of the many in order to be better able to deal with the few terrorists. Both human rights and policing the internet are both things she should stay well clear of.
Not wanting to go against the grain of this thread where although I am thoroughly in agreement with you I feel I should nonetheless at least be in keeping with the discussion and offer you an insult.You smell.
Comrade Steptoe said:
p1stonhead said:
No you seem to have a problem with him for welcoming people. That one or two went on to do abhorrent things he couldnt have known about is irrelevent to his welcoming isnt it?
You are struggling with words again sonny. The word you wanted wasn't "irrelevant", it was "irresponsible".Eddie Strohacker said:
You can call me sonny all day, it won't bug me Simple I don't mind either. Some of us are above personal insults, some of us aren't.
All I'm trying to do is to get you to answer a straight question & you won't do it. Here's why:
Sadiq Khan is that thing that you see wished for on Pistonheads frequently. He's the antithesis of the murderous western hating Jihadi Muslim, he's someone who grew up on a council estate, got himself an education, grafted his way into a future & then offered himself to the public for election & succeeded in that too.
For a small section of people, that really grates. To those people, there is never enough someone like him could ever do to prove that they are one of us. he's the wrong colour, he's the wrong religion, he's the wrong politics. He's somehow one of them - I have no evidence, I just know it to be true...
He comes up on here very single day quoted out of context, accused of giving succour to terrorists & on & on it goes. The irony is those same people who cannot (rightly too) accept Jihadist Muslims in our midst are the same people who rail against a man who has done more than just about anyone to demonstrate he fits in with this society, so with respect, it's you, not I who has conflated two separate issues. It's you who has him wrong & it's also you and still you who will never, ever concede that you've made an error.
So please, come back with another ad hom, after all, it's all you have.
"I have no evidence, I just know it to be true..." Simple I don't mind either. Some of us are above personal insults, some of us aren't.All I'm trying to do is to get you to answer a straight question & you won't do it. Here's why:
Sadiq Khan is that thing that you see wished for on Pistonheads frequently. He's the antithesis of the murderous western hating Jihadi Muslim, he's someone who grew up on a council estate, got himself an education, grafted his way into a future & then offered himself to the public for election & succeeded in that too.
For a small section of people, that really grates. To those people, there is never enough someone like him could ever do to prove that they are one of us. he's the wrong colour, he's the wrong religion, he's the wrong politics. He's somehow one of them - I have no evidence, I just know it to be true...
He comes up on here very single day quoted out of context, accused of giving succour to terrorists & on & on it goes. The irony is those same people who cannot (rightly too) accept Jihadist Muslims in our midst are the same people who rail against a man who has done more than just about anyone to demonstrate he fits in with this society, so with respect, it's you, not I who has conflated two separate issues. It's you who has him wrong & it's also you and still you who will never, ever concede that you've made an error.
So please, come back with another ad hom, after all, it's all you have.
Hilarious. I need say no more sonny, you have mugged yourself off royally.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff