45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2
Discussion
I'm not sure anyone has suggested that Trump is anti-gay. People do, however, complain that he is content to ally himself with the anti-gay elements of the Repubilcan Party, not least among whom is his Vice-President.
As for the emotional ranting, as a prolific pro-Trump posting, despite being green-voting non-Trump supporter, I'd have thought you would see the irony in complaing about what you perceive to be such behaviour from opponents of the man who tweets emotional rants of pure rubbish like this:
As for the emotional ranting, as a prolific pro-Trump posting, despite being green-voting non-Trump supporter, I'd have thought you would see the irony in complaing about what you perceive to be such behaviour from opponents of the man who tweets emotional rants of pure rubbish like this:
Zod said:
I'm not sure anyone has suggested that Trump is anti-gay. People do, however, complain that he is content to ally himself with the anti-gay elements of the Repubilcan Party, not least among whom is his Vice-President.
As for the emotional ranting, as a prolific pro-Trump posting, despite being green-voting non-Trump supporter, I'd have thought you would see the irony in complaing about what you perceive to be such behaviour from opponents of the man who tweets emotional rants of pure rubbish like this:
And he quotes fAs for the emotional ranting, as a prolific pro-Trump posting, despite being green-voting non-Trump supporter, I'd have thought you would see the irony in complaing about what you perceive to be such behaviour from opponents of the man who tweets emotional rants of pure rubbish like this:
kING FOX NEWS as a source all the time!This just in - stats which may or may not be true! And he actually thinks these jobs are down to him in his first month rather than the last administration
Zod said:
I'm not sure anyone has suggested that Trump is anti-gay. People do, however, complain that he is content to ally himself with the anti-gay elements of the Repubilcan Party, not least among whom is his Vice-President.
As for the emotional ranting, as a prolific pro-Trump posting, despite being green-voting non-Trump supporter, I'd have thought you would see the irony in complaing about what you perceive to be such behaviour from opponents of the man who tweets emotional rants of pure rubbish like this:
Ah, but that's been clarified! - When he said tap, he didn't mean tap, and when he said Obama, he didn't mean Obama, so that's all alright then. As for the emotional ranting, as a prolific pro-Trump posting, despite being green-voting non-Trump supporter, I'd have thought you would see the irony in complaing about what you perceive to be such behaviour from opponents of the man who tweets emotional rants of pure rubbish like this:
Greg66 said:
Kellyanne Conway, live, on film, on the subject of how Obama could have bugged Trump: "Microwaves that turn into cameras, et cetera. So we know that that is just a fact of modern life".
To which the interviewer responds, apparently without irony: "Sure, yeah".
What. The. fk?
Warning: may further trigger you.To which the interviewer responds, apparently without irony: "Sure, yeah".
What. The. f
k? https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/8391557150591...
Will he accept reality, or will he double down again?
scherzkeks said:
Warning: may further trigger you.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/8391557150591...
Will he accept reality, or will he double down again?
You do know the difference between a TV and a microwave? Or do you eat your poptarts cold?https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/8391557150591...
Will he accept reality, or will he double down again?
scherzkeks said:
Greg66 said:
Kellyanne Conway, live, on film, on the subject of how Obama could have bugged Trump: "Microwaves that turn into cameras, et cetera. So we know that that is just a fact of modern life".
To which the interviewer responds, apparently without irony: "Sure, yeah".
What. The. fk?
Warning: may further trigger you.To which the interviewer responds, apparently without irony: "Sure, yeah".
What. The. f
k? https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/8391557150591...
Will he accept reality, or will he double down again?
king retard. A complete triggered fking retard. If you do not understand the difference between being able to turn on a microphone in a TV which has a microphone built into it and not being able to turn a microwave into a camera I suggest you repeat your current school year.
You have triggered yourself to ease your loss of reality with a quadruple down on a lethal cocktail of cognitive dissonance and epic gullibility this time.
(that's enough borrowed Joker cliches for one post)
The Samsung TV story is overblown in any case. It applies to certain 2012/13 TV models. The firmware needs to be loaded manually using a usb stick, so you either have to infect yourself or the CIA has to break into your house to do so.
If Trump has any Samsung TVs, all he has to do is check for a blue led on the back when they are switched off. If it's there, then maybe the CIA has been listening in!
https://www.wired.com/2017/03/worried-cia-hacked-s...
If Trump has any Samsung TVs, all he has to do is check for a blue led on the back when they are switched off. If it's there, then maybe the CIA has been listening in!
https://www.wired.com/2017/03/worried-cia-hacked-s...
TTwiggy said:
scherzkeks said:
Warning: may further trigger you.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/8391557150591...
Will he accept reality, or will he double down again?
You do know the difference between a TV and a microwave? Or do you eat your poptarts cold?https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/8391557150591...
Will he accept reality, or will he double down again?
Greg66 said:
TTwiggy said:
scherzkeks said:
Warning: may further trigger you.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/8391557150591...
Will he accept reality, or will he double down again?
You do know the difference between a TV and a microwave? Or do you eat your poptarts cold?https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/8391557150591...
Will he accept reality, or will he double down again?
Disastrous said:
scherzkeks said:
Colonial said:
How anyone can defend this incompetent and bumbling clusterfk is really beyond me.
I hope this is incredibly smart diversion politics. People this incompetent can't be trusted with this much power, can they?
Still knee-deep in cognitive dissonance. Doubling down again. k is really beyond me. I hope this is incredibly smart diversion politics. People this incompetent can't be trusted with this much power, can they?
Just accept reality. You will be a lot less angry.
t. This was all pointed out and continues to be pointed out by the media. But it didn't matter. He won. Because there are enough stupid people in the US who either didn't realise he was lying so much or didn't care because they hated Mexicans /Muslims /the Chinese so much that they didn't care about the lies.. And this isn't going to change any time soon.johnfm said:
Isn't the obvious response here for Obama to initiate defamation proceedings against Trump?
They like a bit of litigation over there - and I would say an allegation against an Ex-President that he illegally wire tapped phones would be damaging to Obama's reputation.
But the defamation laws in the UK are different to the US. It's much easier to win here in the UK as the burden of proof is on the author. In the US the burden of proof rests with the person who brings a claim of libel. This is why people like to try to bring libel cases to the UK. They like a bit of litigation over there - and I would say an allegation against an Ex-President that he illegally wire tapped phones would be damaging to Obama's reputation.
p1stonhead said:
This just in - stats which may or may not be true! And he actually thinks these jobs are down to him in his first month rather than the last administration
Lets assume the BLS arn't part of a Trump administration conspiracy for a moment and imagine the numbers were significantly worse; who would have got the blame? Of course the numbers have nothing to do with him but there's no denying the markets have been on a tear and confidence is up since his election, both of which drive job growth. Ultimately one months number is completely irrelevant but, just like project fear, much of the wailing about Trump is not coming true. Plenty of time for the wheels to come of both yet though.fblm said:
p1stonhead said:
This just in - stats which may or may not be true! And he actually thinks these jobs are down to him in his first month rather than the last administration
Lets assume the BLS arn't part of a Trump administration conspiracy for a moment and imagine the numbers were significantly worse; who would have got the blame? Of course the numbers have nothing to do with him but there's no denying the markets have been on a tear and confidence is up since his election, both of which drive job growth. Ultimately one months number is completely irrelevant but, just like project fear, much of the wailing about Trump is not coming true. Plenty of time for the wheels to come of both yet though.p1stonhead said:
This just in - stats which may or may not be true! And he actually thinks these jobs are down to him in his first month rather than the last administration
.
19 times going back to 2012, Trump said the job figure were fake news. E.g .
July 7, 2016
“The phony 5 percent numbers that we hear about with the unemployment.”
Aug. 8, 2016
“The 5 percent figure is one of the biggest hoaxes in modern politics.”
Nov. 4, 2016
“The terrible jobs report that just came out … you can see phony numbers, 5 percent.”
Dec. 8, 2016
“The unemployment number, as you know, is totally fiction.”
Now they are true because clusterf
k has been in office 4 weeks. 
Just seen a report on the BBC quoting the pertinent US govt department who have analysed The new healthcare system replacing OBamacare.
If you are 64, earning $26K per annum and dependent on Obamacare your annual health insurance bill will go up by a factor of six to $14k per annum.
As the commentator said , who votes in the mid terms? Old people.
Trump funding Tax givewaways to the rich by hitting his base supporters. Is that what they voted for?
The Republicans will be looking to dump Trump is short measure if this idiocy continues.
Cheers,
Tony
If you are 64, earning $26K per annum and dependent on Obamacare your annual health insurance bill will go up by a factor of six to $14k per annum.
As the commentator said , who votes in the mid terms? Old people.
Trump funding Tax givewaways to the rich by hitting his base supporters. Is that what they voted for?
The Republicans will be looking to dump Trump is short measure if this idiocy continues.
Cheers,
Tony
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff