UKIP First 100 Days WTF!!!
Discussion
JensenA said:
Countdown said:
Scuffers said:
??
look, it's actually quite easy.
a non-gay person does not introduce themselves as such do they? they don;t have tee-shirts made with "I'm straight, get over it" emblazoned in them do they?
why do (some) Gay people feel the need to tell us (at our expense)?
I honestly don't care if who I am speaking/dealing with is gay or straight, I simply don't see the need to be told like it's paramount to whatever interactions I might be having with them.
look, it's actually quite easy.
a non-gay person does not introduce themselves as such do they? they don;t have tee-shirts made with "I'm straight, get over it" emblazoned in them do they?
why do (some) Gay people feel the need to tell us (at our expense)?
I honestly don't care if who I am speaking/dealing with is gay or straight, I simply don't see the need to be told like it's paramount to whatever interactions I might be having with them.
![rofl](/inc/images/rofl.gif)
Would I be right in assuming you're over 60?
I'm with Scuffers on this one.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
Reminded me of the woman in "meet the kippers"
968 said:
Scuffers said:
So, oh great one, what would you describe him as?
Gay zellot?
Gay rights warrior?
Why describe him as anything other than a previous environment secretary? Why have to define him by his sexuality at all?Gay zellot?
Gay rights warrior?
Countdown said:
JensenA said:
Countdown said:
Scuffers said:
??
look, it's actually quite easy.
a non-gay person does not introduce themselves as such do they? they don;t have tee-shirts made with "I'm straight, get over it" emblazoned in them do they?
why do (some) Gay people feel the need to tell us (at our expense)?
I honestly don't care if who I am speaking/dealing with is gay or straight, I simply don't see the need to be told like it's paramount to whatever interactions I might be having with them.
look, it's actually quite easy.
a non-gay person does not introduce themselves as such do they? they don;t have tee-shirts made with "I'm straight, get over it" emblazoned in them do they?
why do (some) Gay people feel the need to tell us (at our expense)?
I honestly don't care if who I am speaking/dealing with is gay or straight, I simply don't see the need to be told like it's paramount to whatever interactions I might be having with them.
![rofl](/inc/images/rofl.gif)
Would I be right in assuming you're over 60?
I'm with Scuffers on this one.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
![](/inc/images/censored.gif)
Reminded me of the woman in "meet the kippers"
968 said:
Scuffers said:
I wouldn't except he chose to bring his sexuality into his work, and divert public funds to support his cause.
Ok fine, criticise that, why use a perjorative insult? It shows incredible immaturity.Way i see it, abuse your position in public office, expect to be pilloried
WinstonWolf said:
There you go again, prejudging all elderly people based on your own narrow preconceptions. Funny how supposed liberals are anything but when you scratch below the surface.
I think you might need to change your reading glasses grandad.....Where have I said that ALL old people are the same?
Countdown said:
WinstonWolf said:
There you go again, prejudging all elderly people based on your own narrow preconceptions. Funny how supposed liberals are anything but when you scratch below the surface.
I think you might need to change your reading glasses grandad.....Where have I said that ALL old people are the same?
What is your perceived issue with people over sixty?
Scuffers said:
So, oh great one, what would you describe him as?
Gay zellot?
Gay rights warrior?
Well, to clarify, gay is fine. If you feel that he is a gay rights warrior, then I guess that's fine too. Poofter, whether raving or not, is not fine.Gay zellot?
Gay rights warrior?
I now expect lots of cries of 'well nobody sent me a memo on which words are ok to use.' After all, we've already had the predictable attempts to divert attention with accusations of age prejudice. Sometimes it almost seems scripted in here.
968 said:
Scuffers said:
I wouldn't except he chose to bring his sexuality into his work, and divert public funds to support his cause.
Ok fine, criticise that, why use a perjorative insult? It shows incredible immaturity.As a result, hundreds, if not thousands, of people suffered terribly.
Should he be punished for this?
don4l said:
Chris Smith promoted Gay Rights using money that was intended to protect peoples' homes.
As a result, hundreds, if not thousands, of people suffered terribly.
Should he be punished for this?
If your allegation is true, then he should face a parliamentary select committee to answer these allegations. However, calling him a raving poofter, is a pathetically immature and frankly homophobic comment.As a result, hundreds, if not thousands, of people suffered terribly.
Should he be punished for this?
Countdown said:
WinstonWolf said:
Why ask scuffers if he's over 60 if you're not ageist?
I'm wondering iwhether his homophobia is down to his cultural upbringing.To try and keep it on topic.....do other UKIP supporters share Scuffers' homophobia? I notice none have condemned it.
![rofl](/inc/images/rofl.gif)
Matt Nunns a racist, turns out you're ageist. Brilliant...
Scuffers said:
Why is it so hard for you to understand i was trying to insult the moron?
It's clear you were trying to insult him, but you seem to lack the understanding that insulting people on the basis of their sexual orientation, colour, beliefs etc is wrong. It's quite appropriate that such attitudes should be displayed by a UKIPer because it confirms the suspicion many have that it is a party full of bigots, supported by bigots.Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff