Your voting intentions
Poll: Your voting intentions
Total Members Polled: 1201
Discussion
President Merkin said:
You reckon? You could try voting for a party other than the one that has gleefully sought to divide society at every opportunity if societal cohesion is your big worry.
Never read such a flowering pile of sepia tinted garbage in all my life. Hey Dagnir, we used to have Rickets, Diptheria & child chimney sweeps too, you miss the good old days eh?
Any response to any of the points I've actually made?Never read such a flowering pile of sepia tinted garbage in all my life. Hey Dagnir, we used to have Rickets, Diptheria & child chimney sweeps too, you miss the good old days eh?
Or is meaningless, irrelevant hyperbole all you've got?
Honestly, did you really think this was a good response??
/facepalm
Evanivitch said:
Jordie Barretts sock said:
Perhaps you could explain what is misogynistic in my posts? I've called her thick, because she is. I've also said that she's there because stupid people find her physically attractive. I don't see either of those things as being misogyny.
Other posters have made comments that could be seen as misogynistic. I don't see mine that way.
Other posters have made comments that could be seen as misogynistic. I don't see mine that way.
There you go. You clearly can't accept your own actions. Nor read your own links.I'll own it if you can explain it.
Anyone can play semantics about what was said until they’re blue in the face.
It doesn’t change the fact that she’s a ghastly little specimen.
There’s nothing I want more in UK politics than strong opposition, but she’s nothing but a common tramp who thinks making more noise than anyone else in the room means she’s better at debating.
I’d be embarrassed to have her as a key face of Britain.
It doesn’t change the fact that she’s a ghastly little specimen.
There’s nothing I want more in UK politics than strong opposition, but she’s nothing but a common tramp who thinks making more noise than anyone else in the room means she’s better at debating.
I’d be embarrassed to have her as a key face of Britain.
Jordie Barretts sock said:
Evanivitch said:
Jordie Barretts sock said:
Perhaps you could explain what is misogynistic in my posts? I've called her thick, because she is. I've also said that she's there because stupid people find her physically attractive. I don't see either of those things as being misogyny.
Other posters have made comments that could be seen as misogynistic. I don't see mine that way.
Other posters have made comments that could be seen as misogynistic. I don't see mine that way.
There you go. You clearly can't accept your own actions. Nor read your own links.I'll own it if you can explain it.
Would you say that about a male politician?
Royal Jelly said:
Anyone can play semantics about what was said until they’re blue in the face.
It doesn’t change the fact that she’s a ghastly little specimen.
There’s nothing I want more in UK politics than strong opposition, but she’s nothing but a common tramp who thinks making more noise than anyone else in the room means she’s better at debating.
I’d be embarrassed to have her as a key face of Britain.
Common tramp? I'm assuming you aren't calling her a hobbo.It doesn’t change the fact that she’s a ghastly little specimen.
There’s nothing I want more in UK politics than strong opposition, but she’s nothing but a common tramp who thinks making more noise than anyone else in the room means she’s better at debating.
I’d be embarrassed to have her as a key face of Britain.
Royal Jelly said:
Anyone can play semantics about what was said until they’re blue in the face.
It doesn’t change the fact that she’s a ghastly little specimen.
There’s nothing I want more in UK politics than strong opposition, but she’s nothing but a common tramp who thinks making more noise than anyone else in the room means she’s better at debating.
I’d be embarrassed to have her as a key face of Britain.
The language you use makes you sound as bad as she does.It doesn’t change the fact that she’s a ghastly little specimen.
There’s nothing I want more in UK politics than strong opposition, but she’s nothing but a common tramp who thinks making more noise than anyone else in the room means she’s better at debating.
I’d be embarrassed to have her as a key face of Britain.
chrispmartha said:
President Merkin said:
LimaDelta said:
Dagnir said:
We use to have a national spirit, we used to be proud of being British. We used to want to stick together to protect our country and preserve our wonderful way of life.
Most of that is simply gone. Our societal cohesion has been obliterated. Our trust in our fellow citizens is utterly eroded. So many have been convinced that we're a terrible country with an immoral past.
It has been heartbreaking to watch unfold. To watch so many people willingly destroy what has made us great, whilst preaching that they're the ones doing the right thing, is beyond maddening and truly detestable.
.
Indeed. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be an option to remedy that via the ballot box. Most of that is simply gone. Our societal cohesion has been obliterated. Our trust in our fellow citizens is utterly eroded. So many have been convinced that we're a terrible country with an immoral past.
It has been heartbreaking to watch unfold. To watch so many people willingly destroy what has made us great, whilst preaching that they're the ones doing the right thing, is beyond maddening and truly detestable.
.
Never read such a flowering pile of sepia tinted garbage in all my life. Hey Dagnir, we used to have Rickets, Diptheria & child chimney sweeps too, you miss the good old days eh?
What did I say that was so bad?!? Why does this trigger people? Why can't people engage with the points instead of being outraged. What's there to be outraged about?
It's bonkers.
Your programming is so complete that even in response to a post highlighting said behaviour, you still can't help yourselves.
Useful idiots everywhere. Quite remarkable.
jshell said:
Dagnir said:
768 said:
Timothy Bucktu said:
jshell said:
Starmer says he'd choose Davos and WEF over Westminster. Seems a bit strange to me...
https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1793544149821...
And there are people who think voting makes a difference, or who they vote for makes any difference...it doesn't of course, but I guess having an optimistic outlook is a good thing.https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1793544149821...
Truly baffling how some people support this.
Vot Labour for 'change'!
Vote Tory for 'better'!
Vote LibDem for something.
Vote Reform as a protest... Nothing will change, the Uniparty will win and follow their instructions whilst enriching themselves.
I think we are approaching a new version of the Feudal system. Not exactly as depicted here, but close enough.
It's deliberate...they just don't know what they're doing.
Dagnir said:
Another one spouting irrelevant leftist buzzwords.
What did I say that was so bad?!? Why does this trigger people? Why can't people engage with the points instead of being outraged. What's there to be outraged about?
It's bonkers.
Your programming is so complete that even in response to a post highlighting said behaviour, you still can't help yourselves.
Useful idiots everywhere. Quite remarkable.
They’re not buzzwords, they're things that were prevalent in our past, I’m just asking you when this better time you talk about was?What did I say that was so bad?!? Why does this trigger people? Why can't people engage with the points instead of being outraged. What's there to be outraged about?
It's bonkers.
Your programming is so complete that even in response to a post highlighting said behaviour, you still can't help yourselves.
Useful idiots everywhere. Quite remarkable.
hstewie said:Evanivitch said:
You okay, hun?
Don't really see the obsession with commenting on a politicians attractiveness, seems to be a PH trolls first line of comment for every female politician. Imagine if you're female family members were judge by their attractiveness ahead of their professionalism.
Obsession?Don't really see the obsession with commenting on a politicians attractiveness, seems to be a PH trolls first line of comment for every female politician. Imagine if you're female family members were judge by their attractiveness ahead of their professionalism.
I made one comment, expressing my opinion.
You've made several posts saying the same thing claiming misogyny.
Who's obsessed?
How are people so blind to their own hypocrasy??
Amusing though...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff