45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 3

45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 3

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Tony33

1,130 posts

124 months

Monday 13th November 2017
quotequote all
Not-The-Messiah said:
I don't perticualy like Trump but a what I do hate his this unfair over the top hysterical approach to Trump.
It seems often the case where people are arrogant and downright rude to people they seem to be the most sensitive to getting a bit back. When people are caught blatantly lying and dismissive facts it is hardly surprising that people wish to point this out.

Yes, there are many who would love to see Trump fall because of what he has said an done but it hardly seems that people are twisting his words around to make something that isn't there - it is exactly what he has said and done that people find fault with IMHO.

Halb

53,012 posts

185 months

Monday 13th November 2017
quotequote all
JUst watched Maher, he reckons this is not the end, nor the beginning of the end, but maybe the end of the beginning. biggrin

Gandahar

9,600 posts

130 months

Monday 13th November 2017
quotequote all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41974116


"As soon as the picture was being snapped on the one-two-three he dropped his hands from my waist down to my buttocks and gave it a nice, ripe squeeze, which would account for the fact that in the photograph my mouth is hanging wide open," Ms Corrigan said."

My 3 comments on the matter in hand, pardon the pun.

1. The mouth is not hanging wide open.

2. The phrase " gave it a nice, ripe squeeze, " is rather an unusual expression for any lady to write, has this been over egged on the ripe department by people after $$$ on the current gravy train? Gold diggers?

3. People complaining about a touched bottom after they voted in 45th president of the USA who grabbed women by the pussy ... scratchchin


Hairy front bottom or not? questions questions .....

wink
_

Zod

35,295 posts

260 months

Monday 13th November 2017
quotequote all
Gandahar said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41974116


"As soon as the picture was being snapped on the one-two-three he dropped his hands from my waist down to my buttocks and gave it a nice, ripe squeeze, which would account for the fact that in the photograph my mouth is hanging wide open," Ms Corrigan said."

My 3 comments on the matter in hand, pardon the pun.

1. The mouth is not hanging wide open.

2. The phrase " gave it a nice, ripe squeeze, " is rather an unusual expression for any lady to write, has this been over egged on the ripe department by people after $$$ on the current gravy train? Gold diggers?

3. People complaining about a touched bottom after they voted in 45th president of the USA who grabbed women by the pussy ... scratchchin


Hairy front bottom or not? questions questions .....

wink
_
Misogynist arse!

Edit, I just realised this wasn’t about Trump but Bush Major. These stories suggest an old man who ought to know better, but who does not have Trump’s predatory intent.

Edited by Zod on Monday 13th November 21:55

anonymous-user

56 months

Monday 13th November 2017
quotequote all
Gandahar said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41974116


"As soon as the picture was being snapped on the one-two-three he dropped his hands from my waist down to my buttocks and gave it a nice, ripe squeeze, which would account for the fact that in the photograph my mouth is hanging wide open," Ms Corrigan said."

My 3 comments on the matter in hand, pardon the pun.

1. The mouth is not hanging wide open.

2. The phrase " gave it a nice, ripe squeeze, " is rather an unusual expression for any lady to write, has this been over egged on the ripe department by people after $$$ on the current gravy train? Gold diggers?

3. People complaining about a touched bottom after they voted in 45th president of the USA who grabbed women by the pussy ... scratchchin


Hairy front bottom or not? questions questions .....

wink
_
According to the radio his spokesperson has apologised and accepted he's a bit inappropriate.

Gandahar

9,600 posts

130 months

Monday 13th November 2017
quotequote all
I can imagine. US men of his age brought up in a different era

Check out this

BIG BIG BIG John Wayne

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dILqoEkQ6Hw


Skip to 1 min 30. that was ok in those days. And then a bar fight.....

Context is needed, other wise every old man in the world we will have to cut their hands off, and do some re education brain wise on 2017 and the current climate. Good luck to them.

Modern day man has no exuses though. Back later, doing the washing up, my daughter likes cooking, hates the chores ...

Edited by Gandahar on Monday 13th November 22:05

minimoog

6,907 posts

221 months

Monday 13th November 2017
quotequote all
More swamp draining:

Trump has nominated Brett J. Talley to the federal district judiciary in Alabama. This has been controversial owing to the fact that Talley is only 36, has never tried a case, and received a rare “not qualified” rating from the American Bar Association. Nevertheless despite his lack of relevant experience he has been voted through by the Senate judiciary committee. During his committee hearing he was asked if he has any family members or associates who might constitute a conflict of interest. He replied that he did not.

Turns out he forgot to mention his wife, who is a lawyer in the White House. She is one of the people questioned by Mueller's investigation.

Also she is not just any old White House lawyer; she is the chief of staff to Don McGhan, who happens to oversee, er, Trump's judicial nominations...

What a stshow.



Edited by minimoog on Monday 13th November 22:19

jmorgan

36,010 posts

286 months

Monday 13th November 2017
quotequote all
Ops. Seems a nomination for some legal position needs no qualification and nepotism rules.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/us/politics/tru...

Pass the sauce....

Blue Cat

976 posts

188 months

Monday 13th November 2017
quotequote all
So it appears that Trump the lessor and Wikileaks were working together

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/...


Julian Assange asked to be Australia’s ambassador to the United States.

Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

88 months

Monday 13th November 2017
quotequote all
Blue Cat]S said:
Julian Assange asked to be Australia’s ambassador to the United States.
JA: I'll use the power of the internet to smash state sponsored oppression.
Also JA: Can I be ambassador?

AreOut

3,658 posts

163 months

Tuesday 14th November 2017
quotequote all
umm, I find it hard to believe that JA doesn't know it's Australia deciding about its ambassador appointments and not USA

Blue Cat said:
So it appears that Trump the lessor and Wikileaks were working together

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/...


Julian Assange asked to be Australia’s ambassador to the United States.
they were in communication (although a very brief one) but I wouldn't call that "working together", since Donald Jr. didn't really listen to the advice (maybe it was smart from him I dunno)

Exposing dirt of your opponent is legit strategy so I can't see the problem here especially because WL has never published fake files.


Edited by AreOut on Tuesday 14th November 01:17

roachcoach

3,975 posts

157 months

Tuesday 14th November 2017
quotequote all
AreOut said:
they were in communication (although a very brief one) but I wouldn't call that "working together", since Donald Jr. didn't really listen to the advice (maybe it was smart from him I dunno)

Exposing dirt of your opponent is legit strategy so I can't see the problem here especially because WL has never published fake files.


Edited by AreOut on Tuesday 14th November 01:17
Yeah maybe he is the unluckiest guy in the world with really, really bad fluke timing (my bold):

TFA said:
“Strongly suggest your dad tweets this link if he mentions us,” WikiLeaks went on, pointing Trump Jr. to the link wlsearch.tk, which it said would help Trump’s followers dig through the trove of stolen documents and find stories. “There’s many great stories the press are missing and we’re sure some of your follows [sic] will find it,” WikiLeaks went on. “Btw we just released Podesta Emails Part 4.”

Trump Jr. did not respond to this message. But just 15 minutes after it was sent, as The Wall Street Journal’s Byron Tau pointed out, Donald Trump himself tweeted, “Very little pick-up by the dishonest media of incredible information provided by WikiLeaks. So dishonest! Rigged system!”
Or maybe this is another one for the pile.

Byker28i

61,573 posts

219 months

Tuesday 14th November 2017
quotequote all
Can we talk Tax plans? The ROP/Donald still want to push this trickle down tax plan, giving huge tax cuts to the rich and companies assuming that the benefits would filter down to those below, with higher wages and more jobs.

But this has never happened before. Reagan tried it, as did Bush senior. All that happened was that the rich got richer and the poor got poorer. Companies paid out the extra money to shareholders and bonuses to senior management.

It'll reduce tax revenues by $1.5 trillion over the next 10 years, the legal maximum they can do this. At the moment the deficit is growing significantly. So they are going to run up debt to give huge tax breaks to the wealthy. When the debt runs up, that will lead to budget cuts which is more likely to affect the poor and middle class, further increasing the inequality. The only reason to do this is to reward your wealthy donors...

Of course, the donald weighed in, suggesting using the tax reform to repeal the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, using the savings from 15 million Americans going uninsured to cut income taxes on the wealthy

They are using averages to disguise the gains
Sarah Saunders "The average american family would get a $4000 raise under the presidents tax cut plans. So how could any member of congress be against this?"
Well, as Franklin Leonard said: "If I give 10 apples to one person and none to 9, the average person has 1 apple. Why are 9 people mad?"


AreOut

3,658 posts

163 months

Tuesday 14th November 2017
quotequote all
I can't see anything wrong with that again.

Byker28i

61,573 posts

219 months

Tuesday 14th November 2017
quotequote all
It's not looking bad for the donald either. His last released tax return showed he paid hugely through the alternative minimum tax - which is to be repealed under the new plans. Both House and Senate bills offer big tax cuts for income from “pass-through” corporations — such as the donalds companies and both bills would either kill or scale back estate taxes, allowing Trump’s kids to inherit his fortune tax-free.

Then theres the plan to allow golf courses to claim tax relief through conservation easements

Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

88 months

Tuesday 14th November 2017
quotequote all
AreOut said:
umm, I find it hard to believe that JA doesn't know it's Australia deciding about its ambassador appointments and not USA
You'd have to ask him directly about that. If the mails are true, he asked Don Jr. to ask his dad to make a request to Australia on the issue. Happy to point you to the relevant passage in the article if you didn't read it.

AreOut

3,658 posts

163 months

Tuesday 14th November 2017
quotequote all
I know but it doesn't work that way.

Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

88 months

Tuesday 14th November 2017
quotequote all
AreOut said:
I know but it doesn't work that way.
Yeees, we all know how it works. The point is Assange asked. The further point is he's mental for a) asking & b) entertaining the idea that Australia would make top level diplomatic appointments at the behest of a foreign government.

See also: Farage, Nigel (Fascist party, masquerading behind faux nationalism schtick).

AreOut

3,658 posts

163 months

Tuesday 14th November 2017
quotequote all
Nigel Farage a fascist?!

Eddie Strohacker

3,879 posts

88 months

Tuesday 14th November 2017
quotequote all
AreOut said:
Nigel Farage a fascist?!
Yes. Nigel Farage is a fascist. Now about Assange?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED