Climate change - the POLITICAL debate. Vol 4
Discussion
jjlynn27 said:
I read this thread from time to time, and it's always the same, durbster and PN destroying conspiracy nutjobs.
Have to say, after reading this, gonna check the share price for Priory group, they are bound to go up.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
Have to say, after reading this, gonna check the share price for Priory group, they are bound to go up.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
Mandy Rice-Davis said:
Well you would say that wouldn't you.
Ali G said:
jjlynn27 said:
I read this thread from time to time, and it's always the same, durbster and PN destroying conspiracy nutjobs.
Have to say, after reading this, gonna check the share price for Priory group, they are bound to go up.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
PPE or highers in Beckham studies?Have to say, after reading this, gonna check the share price for Priory group, they are bound to go up.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
![scratchchin](/inc/images/scratchchin.gif)
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
jjlynn27 said:
Ali G said:
jjlynn27 said:
I read this thread from time to time, and it's always the same, durbster and PN destroying conspiracy nutjobs.
Have to say, after reading this, gonna check the share price for Priory group, they are bound to go up.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
PPE or highers in Beckham studies?Have to say, after reading this, gonna check the share price for Priory group, they are bound to go up.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
![scratchchin](/inc/images/scratchchin.gif)
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
![rofl](/inc/images/rofl.gif)
Ali G said:
jjlynn27 said:
Ali G said:
jjlynn27 said:
I read this thread from time to time, and it's always the same, durbster and PN destroying conspiracy nutjobs.
Have to say, after reading this, gonna check the share price for Priory group, they are bound to go up.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
PPE or highers in Beckham studies?Have to say, after reading this, gonna check the share price for Priory group, they are bound to go up.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
![scratchchin](/inc/images/scratchchin.gif)
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
![rofl](/inc/images/rofl.gif)
Now, tell me about your last homoeopathy session. Or chemtrails. Or any other conspiracy (I'm not really that picky, I enjoy them all equally).
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
jjlynn27 said:
Ali G said:
jjlynn27 said:
Ali G said:
jjlynn27 said:
I read this thread from time to time, and it's always the same, durbster and PN destroying conspiracy nutjobs.
Have to say, after reading this, gonna check the share price for Priory group, they are bound to go up.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
PPE or highers in Beckham studies?Have to say, after reading this, gonna check the share price for Priory group, they are bound to go up.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
![scratchchin](/inc/images/scratchchin.gif)
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
![rofl](/inc/images/rofl.gif)
Now, tell me about your last homoeopathy session. Or chemtrails. Or any other conspiracy (I'm not really that picky, I enjoy them all equally).
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
jjlynn27 said:
Ali G said:
Once heard about this chap called jjlynn27 with an obsessive tendency towards all matters concerning conspiracy theories but with so little grasp of reality that all that he could do was to point, gurgle and dribble.
Do you expect any other reaction to any of your posts? ![biggrin](/inc/images/biggrin.gif)
Apparently not as per your contributions which amount to little more than spamming!
It was a quite spectacular contribution combining both sly dig at intellectual ability and tin-foil hattered nutiness - so well done on that front!
![clap](/inc/images/clap.gif)
Hey, ho carry on - lets not pollute the thread any further - and that means you.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
cookie118 said:
"These are the kind of non-stories that get picked on by the organized denialists and twisted beyond recognition.”The irony is strong in this load of hypocrisy.
Jinx said:
durbster said:
That's the best you have? ![laugh](/inc/images/laugh.gif)
(hint: that's not science)
QED![laugh](/inc/images/laugh.gif)
(hint: that's not science)
Oh well, at least you avoided the strategy of others, that is: writing some "sciencey" blurb while citing papers that make you seem authoritative - but don't actually support your position - and hoping nobody will bother to check.
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff