EU vote to ban porn

[turbobloke]

hairykrishna said:

How could that even work?

I'm increasingly annoyed that internet related laws seem to be set by people who don't have the first idea what they're doing.

Sure thing, but sadly your comment applies beyond internet considerations.

[Steameh]

Robb F said:

I would put money on these idiots being similar to the jealous ugly people who protest against Hooters. It seems these days you're simply not allowed to enjoy yourself at all. We should cull the whole, boring lot of them.

Has no one told the protesters that the girls who work at Hooters aren't forced to do so? They have a choice to work there?

Or don't they care as long as they have something to protest about.

[hollydog]

Me thinks its a bit hardcore from europe.

[Happy82]

Getragdogleg said:

If Porn is banned, properly banned not banned for seconds until you find a way to get it anyway, there will be a lot of people with tons of time on their hands who are also quite frustrated, a ban on porn could be the call to arms for lots of folks to finally ban the EU.

See, I always try to look for the silver lining.

I can just picture the millions of men waking from their porn-induced slumber..... EU wouldn't know what hit them

[Smiler.]

Meh, I don't miss it.

[Morningside]

There is bound to be a backdoor.

[smegmore]

Fishtigua said:

Ban on adverts for sex tourism?

That's Magaluf holidays buggered then.

[Mr_B]

Blimey, could be UKIP's biggest vote winner.

[Welshbeef]

How many individuals would stop using the web?

I'm sure average usage of web and tissue consumption would decrease so maybe its a green and get you off your arse keeping fit angle?

Or they are idiots people like porn who doesn't also once you start utalisinf proxy servers no matter what the country your in does you'll be able to view whatever you like .


I say no to banning porn.

[Pesty]

Mr_B said:

Blimey, could be UKIP's biggest vote winner.

[AnonSpoilsport]

Digger said:

Article said:

Kartika Liotard, a Dutch left-wing feminist MEP . . .

So what will they do with Amsterdam if she gets her way? There's only so many tulips you can sell.

[Justices]

Robb F said:

What a miserable-looking woman. Perfect candidate for a job aboard a BA flight!

[Don]

g3org3y said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kV7ou6pl5wU

Fact.

That was hilarious...thanks for posting..

[Getragdogleg]

Justices said:

Robb F said:

What a miserable-looking woman. Perfect candidate for a job aboard a BA flight!

When this topic came up the first thing that popped into my head was that picture, I love the way the miserable woman seems to be in a kind of monochrome while those around are young, bright and obviously having more fun.

[MrBrightSi]

Steameh said:

Robb F said:

I would put money on these idiots being similar to the jealous ugly people who protest against Hooters. It seems these days you're simply not allowed to enjoy yourself at all. We should cull the whole, boring lot of them.

Has no one told the protesters that the girls who work at Hooters aren't forced to do so? They have a choice to work there?

Or don't they care as long as they have something to protest about.

This is what i hate about modern femanism, that stupid duality that men are evil becuase they like women at hooters, but women do no wrong if they work at hooters.

Why are men suddenly the evil ones who have brought all this to this world, when its the women who enjoy the wage they get from it and most probably love the attention.

If they really want things to change, shouldn't they first target the women who coast along their entire lives on their looks, before they target me for giving in to finding them attractive?

[fourwheelsteer]

MrBrightSi said:

This is what i hate about modern femanism, that men are evil becuase

Fixed that for you. As I understand it, men are evil and we're always at fault. For everything. Ever!

[Vipers]

Justices said:

Happy82 said:

Ticket please

On top of the heavily-in-your-favour stats for your new line of employment, if you fly a Japanese airline the stewardesses are almost always very tidy too! Airlines on this side of the world understand the basics of getting bums on seats. Attractive staff = returning clients. British Airways bless them, seem to be hell-bent on proving to the world that our great nation is the epicentre of frumpy service wenches. They've chosen not to address this oversight despite me filling it in on the "comments & suggestions to improve our service" box on the questionnaires they've emailed me. If they'd get that bit sorted, I'd go out of my way to fly with them.

Edited by Justices on Saturday 9th March 03:50

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

[Badgerboy]

Vipers said:

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Its contractual, in BA the best flights and cabins are given to the most senior cabin crew, who will have been with the company an absolute age. (Senior being how long you have been doing your job, not how good you are at it. True 'Civil Service' stlye) They have changed all new cabin crew contracts now so they can remedy this (Think more like Virgin) but it will take a quite a while for the 'old guard' to work through the system.

Correct on the Asian airlines though, a pretty face goes a long way!

[Pesty]

I flew business class on virgin a couple of times. I'm sure the cabin crew were picked by a man.

[CommanderJameson]

MrBrightSi said:

This is what i hate about modern femanism, that stupid duality that men are evil becuase they like women at hooters, but women do no wrong if they work at hooters.

Why are men suddenly the evil ones who have brought all this to this world, when its the women who enjoy the wage they get from it and most probably love the attention.

If they really want things to change, shouldn't they first target the women who coast along their entire lives on their looks, before they target me for giving in to finding them attractive?

Well, that's certainly a point of view.

It's the women's fault!