State pension goalposts moved again

State pension goalposts moved again

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

56 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Was this in the Election Manifesto?
Thought not..

Atomic12C

5,180 posts

219 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Jimboka said:
Was this in the Election Manifesto?
Thought not..
Does it have to be?

Is a government restricted to its manifesto?

Are manifestos legally binding in the first place?

Thought not... wink


Moonhawk

10,730 posts

221 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
It had to happen.

Since 1980 - average life expectancy in the UK has risen by around 8 years - yet the state pension age did has not risen at anything like the same rate.

Slagathore

5,824 posts

194 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Jimboka said:
Was this in the Election Manifesto?
Thought not..
http://www.pensionsage.com/pa/UK-public-sector-pension-liability-equivalent-to-81pc-of-GDP.php

I didn't see either part addressing it in their manifestos. It doesn't even seem to get mentioned except for on this forum.

richie99

1,116 posts

188 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Kermit power said:
I've got something similar, and I'm really hoping it will provide a decent pension, but to be honest, with maybe 20 years left to go, and with three school-aged kids and a mortgage at the moment, I really can't get my head around what my financial situation is likely to look like when I retire! hehe

As for this change, even though I'm one of the oldest people to be affected by it, so be it. It should've happened years ago.

Personally, I think the government should peg the retirement age at 5 years before average life expectancy, and reset the age every 5 years for people aged between 45-50.
You can be reassured that the Government will tax the hell out of you for having the temerity to have worked hard, made sacrifices and planned for the future. They have to be able to pay for the slackers who can't be bothered somehow.

They are already sitting there with their greedy mitts ready to shaft you when you pass the lifetime allowance. If you think a million is a lot now, wait until there have been 20 years of inflation eating in to it. Assuming that it isn't lowered further, which seems most likely.

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

172 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
No reason why the average person shouldn't be fit enough to work to 70 or beyond these days, but it depends on them looking after themselves a bit.

Blaster72

Original Poster:

10,927 posts

199 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Mr GrimNasty said:
No reason why the average person shouldn't be fit enough to work to 70 or beyond these days, but it depends on them looking after themselves a bit.
There are plenty of reasons the average person in their 70's might not be fit enough to carry on working.

Not to worry though, the robot revolution is coming apparently to take all the manual jobs so we won't need humans for anything soon anyway.

Seriously though, if all those who used to retire at 65 stay on until they're 68 or even 70 won't there need to be millions more jobs created to account for this?

BoRED S2upid

19,771 posts

242 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Wobbegong said:
BoRED S2upid said:
I am and I do expect sweet FA. I try and tell my mates this but nobody listens. You've got to do it on your own you can't rely on anything from the government.
yes

Unless you've found a way to play the system or self fund, expect to be working to the day you die.
I certainly don't expect to be working much past 60 but yes many will be dropping dead in work and never getting any state pension.

CoolHands

18,837 posts

197 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
It had to happen.

Since 1980 - average life expectancy in the UK has risen by around 8 years - yet the state pension age did has not risen at anything like the same rate.
Life expectancy is not increasing at a linear rate

Sa Calobra

37,315 posts

213 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
They are acting as though they are giving pensioners free money. Yet all our lives we pay tax and N.I.

Ihope the Tories leave power soon. They are getting worse.

I've gone from optimistic feeling to disparaging at how poorly they are handling everything.

Brexit will be fumbled.

BoRED S2upid

19,771 posts

242 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
There are plenty of reasons the average person in their 70's might not be fit enough to carry on working.

Not to worry though, the robot revolution is coming apparently to take all the manual jobs so we won't need humans for anything soon anyway.

Seriously though, if all those who used to retire at 65 stay on until they're 68 or even 70 won't there need to be millions more jobs created to account for this?
Oh yes the robot revolution it will need an army of 70 year olds to pull them out of fountains when they all try and drown themselves.

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

172 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Blaster72 said:
There are plenty of reasons the average person in their 70's might not be fit enough to carry on working.
Well I disagree with your disagreeable disagreement, so there.

oop north

1,602 posts

130 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
richie99 said:
They are already sitting there with their greedy mitts ready to shaft you when you pass the lifetime allowance. If you think a million is a lot now, wait until there have been 20 years of inflation eating in to it. Assuming that it isn't lowered further, which seems most likely.
The lifetime allowance is index linked...

Blaster72

Original Poster:

10,927 posts

199 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
Oh yes the robot revolution it will need an army of 70 year olds to pull them out of fountains when they all try and drown themselves.
rofl

Kermit power

28,807 posts

215 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Sa Calobra said:
They are acting as though they are giving pensioners free money. Yet all our lives we pay tax and N.I.

Ihope the Tories leave power soon. They are getting worse.

I've gone from optimistic feeling to disparaging at how poorly they are handling everything.

Brexit will be fumbled.
Whilst I agree with your third and fourth lines, I'd replace "The Tories" with "Theresa May, to be replaced by someone competent" in the second.

On the first line, though, I completely disagree with you.

When the first pension came in, people weren't expected to live more than about 5 years in retirement, but now they tend to live for about 15 years. Have contributions increased three-fold in real terms in the meantime? No, they haven't.

To give a car analogy, imagine a scheme created whereby you could pay in for 40 years and at the end they gave you a Mini.

What has happened over time is that people are still paying in the same amount for the same period of time, yet at the end of it, you're being given a Merc instead of a Mini.

If you paid in the correct amount for a Mini and they gave you a pushbike, then you'd have every right to be disgruntled, but you shouldn't expect to be given a Merc when you've only paid in enough for a Mini. In so far as it's your children and grandchildren who will end up footing the bill, for you, this is free money.

James_B

12,642 posts

259 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Like others above, I'm assuming that I'll get zero from the state, it's all down to what I can save for myself.

It's annoying that the recent changes neither let me fund it by very much nor offset the income from my alternative investment against cost, but that's just the way things work, I suppose, higher earners have for a fair while now been "asked" to pay more in to the communal pot, and are entitled to take less out.

There's no point moaning about it, though, I just have to put that much more aside, and keep deciding each year if I keep working or not.

Yipper

5,964 posts

92 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
The harsh reality is -- Britain is one of the poorest countries in the Western world, it is burdened with huge public / private debt, and the nation simply cannot afford big pensions for large armies of old folk living decades well into their 70s, 80s and 90s.

With ~80% of Britain a post-industrial, post-service, economic wasteland, and the rich Southeast ~20% about to decline because of Brexit, the country has no choice but to start slashing future public pensions.

If you are under 50, you need to save aggressively for the next 10-20 years and think seriously about moving abroad to somewhere cheaper for retirement, like Bulgaria, Panama or Thailand.

Robertj21a

16,508 posts

107 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all

Nobody ever seems to appreciate that many people who are getting their OAP payments now, at 65, will have probably started work when they were 16 or 18. Many who will now be affected by this small change from 67 to 68 probably won't have started work until after Uni, probably when they're more like 25.

DoubleSix

11,737 posts

178 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
Robertj21a said:
Nobody ever seems to appreciate that many people who are getting their OAP payments now, at 65, will have probably started work when they were 16 or 18. Many who will now be affected by this small change from 67 to 68 probably won't have started work until after Uni, probably when they're more like 25.
Vast majority of my peers had jobs before Uni and worked 20+ hours a week around Uni to make ends meet - silver spoons need not apply.

towser44

3,512 posts

117 months

Wednesday 19th July 2017
quotequote all
DoubleSix said:
Robertj21a said:
Nobody ever seems to appreciate that many people who are getting their OAP payments now, at 65, will have probably started work when they were 16 or 18. Many who will now be affected by this small change from 67 to 68 probably won't have started work until after Uni, probably when they're more like 25.
Vast majority of my peers had jobs before Uni and worked 20+ hours a week around Uni to make ends meet - silver spoons need not apply.
Yep, I've worked continually full-time since I left college at 18 (with only a 3 day break between jobs in those 17 years due to redundancy), but even when at college between 16 and 18 I worked at least 25 hours a week at a supermarket, most weeks it was 35 hours (pre-minimum wage also, so it was for a grand sum of £2.14 an hour).