The Blue Sky thread.

Author
Discussion

SteveNorthEast

297 posts

193 months

Sunday 18th April 2010
quotequote all
They should put different coloured smoke in their engines according to the flight paths.

Like a massive map in the sky.

deeps

5,400 posts

243 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
So aircraft are actually causing global cooling via the albedo effect of clouds, that's good news then. Better not tell the Libdems, that would scupper their plans to increase air fares due to man made-up warming.

BMWBen

4,899 posts

203 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Getragdogleg said:
I know that the weather is nice today, I am saying that if the planes were running as normal the sky down here by now would be foggy and trailed.
Sorry, but that's crap.

If the nice weather was caused by no planes, then how come it was forecast to be clear? Do you think weather models include plane movements?

There are still no planes, but now it's hazy with high level cloud where I am - how would your hypothesis deal with that?

I have seen perfectly clear days with planes flying overhead. Explain that.

The reason why the sky was clear yesterday was because we have a dominant high pressure system overhead, with no mixing of air.

The reason it is cloudy today is this:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/charts/FSXX00T...
(the occluded fronts spanning the country being the key).

Westy Pre-Lit

5,087 posts

205 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Well it's cloudy and overcast today, can we all stop moaning now how nice the weather is.nuts

Getragdogleg

Original Poster:

8,847 posts

185 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
BMWBen said:
Getragdogleg said:
I know that the weather is nice today, I am saying that if the planes were running as normal the sky down here by now would be foggy and trailed.
Sorry, but that's crap.

If the nice weather was caused by no planes, then how come it was forecast to be clear? Do you think weather models include plane movements?

There are still no planes, but now it's hazy with high level cloud where I am - how would your hypothesis deal with that?

I have seen perfectly clear days with planes flying overhead. Explain that.

The reason why the sky was clear yesterday was because we have a dominant high pressure system overhead, with no mixing of air.

The reason it is cloudy today is this:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/charts/FSXX00T...
(the occluded fronts spanning the country being the key).
Oh dear.

1: The weather is nice. it was always going to be nice regardless of planes or no planes.

2: Down here in cornwall we get a lot of overhead air traffic.

3: the planes running (in the nice weather we are having anyway) normally leave trails in the sky that spread out and make the (already nice day) sort of cloudy.

4: I wanted to know why some leave trails and some dont, and If you read the thread and the questions and answers in it you would know that at no point did I say the lack of planes is why we have nice weather.

5: it is a bit hazy here today as well but it is clearing into a nice blue sky day again, a day the planes will not fog up and add to the haze already present.


GTIR

24,741 posts

268 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Hedders said:
GTIR said:
When I lived in Perth, Oz the weather was obviously pretty good 10 months of the year - clear blue sky every day.

I did notice however that the sky was never as clear and crisp as when we have clear days in the UK (twice a year!) it was always a bit dirtier.
Perth is the most isolated city in the world and the amount of air traffic was minute compared to the UK so how do you explain the clear blue skys (in comparison) to the UK?

It's just a coincidence, and anyway it clouded over this afternoon in East Anglia.
Is it not possible that there is more dust/sand in the air in Australia than in the UK??
Exactly my point.
Nothing to do with plane emissions or contrails.

don4l

10,058 posts

178 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
The night skies have also been much clearer for the past few nights. Here in Camberley, the limiting magnitude (the dimmest stars that are visible) has been 4.7 instead of the usual 4. That is quite a significant difference.


Don
--

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

244 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
don4l said:
Here in Camberley, the limiting magnitude (the dimmest stars that are visible) has been 4.7 instead of the usual 4. That is quite a significant difference.


Don
--
How do you measure that? Reference stars?

anonymous-user

56 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Getragdogleg said:
BMWBen said:
Getragdogleg said:
I know that the weather is nice today, I am saying that if the planes were running as normal the sky down here by now would be foggy and trailed.
Sorry, but that's crap.

If the nice weather was caused by no planes, then how come it was forecast to be clear? Do you think weather models include plane movements?

There are still no planes, but now it's hazy with high level cloud where I am - how would your hypothesis deal with that?

I have seen perfectly clear days with planes flying overhead. Explain that.

The reason why the sky was clear yesterday was because we have a dominant high pressure system overhead, with no mixing of air.

The reason it is cloudy today is this:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/charts/FSXX00T...
(the occluded fronts spanning the country being the key).
Oh dear.

1: The weather is nice. it was always going to be nice regardless of planes or no planes.

2: Down here in cornwall we get a lot of overhead air traffic.

3: the planes running (in the nice weather we are having anyway) normally leave trails in the sky that spread out and make the (already nice day) sort of cloudy.

4: I wanted to know why some leave trails and some dont, and If you read the thread and the questions and answers in it you would know that at no point did I say the lack of planes is why we have nice weather.

5: it is a bit hazy here today as well but it is clearing into a nice blue sky day again, a day the planes will not fog up and add to the haze already present.
This just all sounds plane stupid to me........

Eric Mc

122,340 posts

267 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Contrails in 1943 -


BMWBen

4,899 posts

203 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Getragdogleg said:
BMWBen said:
Getragdogleg said:
I know that the weather is nice today, I am saying that if the planes were running as normal the sky down here by now would be foggy and trailed.
Sorry, but that's crap.

If the nice weather was caused by no planes, then how come it was forecast to be clear? Do you think weather models include plane movements?

There are still no planes, but now it's hazy with high level cloud where I am - how would your hypothesis deal with that?

I have seen perfectly clear days with planes flying overhead. Explain that.

The reason why the sky was clear yesterday was because we have a dominant high pressure system overhead, with no mixing of air.

The reason it is cloudy today is this:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/charts/FSXX00T...
(the occluded fronts spanning the country being the key).
Oh dear.

1: The weather is nice. it was always going to be nice regardless of planes or no planes.

2: Down here in cornwall we get a lot of overhead air traffic.

3: the planes running (in the nice weather we are having anyway) normally leave trails in the sky that spread out and make the (already nice day) sort of cloudy.

4: I wanted to know why some leave trails and some dont, and If you read the thread and the questions and answers in it you would know that at no point did I say the lack of planes is why we have nice weather.

5: it is a bit hazy here today as well but it is clearing into a nice blue sky day again, a day the planes will not fog up and add to the haze already present.
1. Ok.
2. Ok.
3. We'll assume this to be true for the purposes of argument.
4. If 3 is true, then yes, you did. You're saying that planes make it cloudy.
5. Oh look, you said it again! You're saying that the day wouldn't be getting "nice" as much if there were planes in the sky, that they would add to the haze.

Oh dear indeed.

party

JMGS4

8,741 posts

272 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Global dimming is a factor, and was measured in central USA after 911. I don't know the amount of dimming the 'planes cause but it was measureable, very very small but measureable.

GTIR

24,741 posts

268 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
JMGS4 said:
Global dimming is a factor, and was measured in central USA after 911. I don't know the amount of dimming the'planes cause but it was measureable, very very small but measureable.
clap
Free air miles to you sir for your attention to grammar.

Getragdogleg

Original Poster:

8,847 posts

185 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
BMWBen said:
If 3 is true, then yes, you did. You're saying that planes make it cloudy.
No, I said the aircraft make trails that spread out in a clear sky, they do not make clouds or alter the weather.

BMWBen said:
5. Oh look, you said it again! You're saying that the day wouldn't be getting "nice" as much if there were planes in the sky, that they would add to the haze.
I have noticed that whan aircraft are operating normally the sky soon gets misted up with merging, drifting trails, Its not weather its aircraft induced foggy haze, its not even a thick covering its a sort of misty smeech.

Yet not all aircraft operating in the sky at the same time leave lingering trails.

I prefer the sky minus the trails to be honest, I am not a fking hippy, I dont believe in mmgw I just prefer blue skies, I understand its not going to last forever and I am sure I will be flying in the same sky contributing to the problem soon.


JB!

5,254 posts

182 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
i watched something on global dimming. fascinating, but dont fully understand the science and how you can read it.

anonymous-user

56 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Getragdogleg said:
BMWBen said:
If 3 is true, then yes, you did. You're saying that planes make it cloudy.
No, I said the aircraft make trails that spread out in a clear sky, they do not make clouds or alter the weather.

BMWBen said:
5. Oh look, you said it again! You're saying that the day wouldn't be getting "nice" as much if there were planes in the sky, that they would add to the haze.
I have noticed that whan aircraft are operating normally the sky soon gets misted up with merging, drifting trails, Its not weather its aircraft induced foggy haze, its not even a thick covering its a sort of misty smeech.

Yet not all aircraft operating in the sky at the same time leave lingering trails.

I prefer the sky minus the trails to be honest, I am not a fking hippy, I dont believe in mmgw I just prefer blue skies, I understand its not going to last forever and I am sure I will be flying in the same sky contributing to the problem soon.
Cloudy and a bit rainy in London today after a couple of days of nice weather.....

Ayahuasca

27,428 posts

281 months

Monday 19th April 2010
quotequote all
Check the humidity readings. I live in the sweltering tropics where it is very humid and the sky is never crisp, always dull with atmospheric moisture even if the sun is shining.


JMGS4

8,741 posts

272 months

Tuesday 20th April 2010
quotequote all
GTIR said:
JMGS4 said:
Global dimming is a factor, and was measured in central USA after 911. I don't know the amount of dimming the 'planes cause but it was measureable, very very small but measureable.
clap
Free air miles to you sir for your attention to grammar.
Thank you very much, that's what a good scottish schooling combined with compulsary spelling homework (six three-sylable words every night and the belt if you got it wrong) did for me. None of this namby-pamby PC weak-kneed liberalistic hogwash that passes for edewkayshun today!

V8mate

45,899 posts

191 months

Tuesday 20th April 2010
quotequote all
JMGS4 said:
GTIR said:
JMGS4 said:
Global dimming is a factor, and was measured in central USA after 911. I don't know the amount of dimming the 'planes cause but it was measureable, very very small but measureable.
clap
Free air miles to you sir for your attention to grammar.
Thank you very much, that's what a good scottish schooling combined with compulsary spelling homework (six three-sylable words every night and the belt if you got it wrong) did for me. None of this namby-pamby PC weak-kneed liberalistic hogwash that passes for edewkayshun today!
Now you've broken it.

JMGS4

8,741 posts

272 months

Tuesday 20th April 2010
quotequote all
V8mate said:
JMGS4 said:
GTIR said:
JMGS4 said:
Global dimming is a factor, and was measured in central USA after 911. I don't know the amount of dimming the 'planes cause but it was measureable, very very small but measureable.
clap
Free air miles to you sir for your attention to grammar.
Thank you very much, that's what a good scottish schooling combined with compulsary spelling homework (six three-sylable words every night and the belt if you got it wrong) did for me. None of this namby-pamby PC weak-kneed liberalistic hogwash that passes for edewkayshun today!
Now you've broken it.
F**K! must be all these years in a foreign country! First calss fail, six of the best for me!

Edited by JMGS4 on Tuesday 20th April 09:21