45th President of the United States, Donald Trump. Vol 2

[Byker28i]

scherzkeks said:

...the shocking Rice revelations.

Really, shocking revelations? Thats pushing it a little isn't it? More likely it was part of the breadcrumbs trail left exposing all of Trumps administrations contacts to Russia.

Is there anyone connected to Trump that hasn't taken russian money, benefited from the russians?


How is his defeating ISIS in 30 days going? I mean he's tried everything possible so far, every weekend off, numerous golf games, numerous unrelated tweets?

Hows his first 100 days promises going? Hum, is that now 100 days when he does some work?
https://trumptracker.github.io/

Edited by Byker28i on Tuesday 4th April 10:29

[rscott]

scherzkeks said:

Leaker unmasked. Surveillance started before Trumpo took office. Propaganda purveyors Bloomberg sat on the story to protect Obama officials.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/confirmed...

Taibbi on Russia Truth. With bonus mention of progressive PH conspiracy hero Louise Mensch.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taib...

Er, simple question for you. Why would so many members of Trump's team have such regular contact with so many Russians? If they hadn't been communicating with them then they wouldn't have been picked up by the surveillance.

[scherzkeks]

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

Leaker unmasked. Surveillance started before Trumpo took office. Propaganda purveyors Bloomberg sat on the story to protect Obama officials.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/confirmed...

Taibbi on Russia Truth. With bonus mention of progressive PH conspiracy hero Louise Mensch.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taib...

Er, simple question for you. Why would so many members of Trump's team have such regular contact with so many Russians? If they hadn't been communicating with them then they wouldn't have been picked up by the surveillance.

Let's stick to suspect activity that we have evidence of: Any comment on the Podesta group lobbying to lift sanctions on the Kremlin?

Perhaps CNN will cover it when they are through investigating the origins of Russian dressing.

[rscott]

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

Leaker unmasked. Surveillance started before Trumpo took office. Propaganda purveyors Bloomberg sat on the story to protect Obama officials.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/confirmed...

Taibbi on Russia Truth. With bonus mention of progressive PH conspiracy hero Louise Mensch.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taib...

Er, simple question for you. Why would so many members of Trump's team have such regular contact with so many Russians? If they hadn't been communicating with them then they wouldn't have been picked up by the surveillance.

Let's stick to suspect activity that we have evidence of: Any comment on the Podesta group lobbying to lift sanctions on the Kremlin?

Perhaps CNN will cover it when they are through investigating the origins of Russian dressing.

You mean the lobbying they carried out perfectly legally and declared on the Senate lobbying disclosure forms? On behalf of the US subsidiary of a Russian bank?

[Eric Mc]

America has been well and truly duped. Who would have imagined in the 21st Century that they would be living in a country effectively being run as a puppet state of Russia.

Tom Clancy - we need you.

[rscott]

Eric Mc said:

America has been well and truly duped. Who would have imagined in the 21st Century that they would be living in a country effectively being run as a puppet state of Russia.

Tom Clancy - we need you.

But the Russians have got Steven Seagal to defend them Time for the US to wheel out Chuck Norris?

[zygalski]

Eric Mc said:

America has been well and truly duped. Who would have imagined in the 21st Century that they would be living in a country effectively being run as a puppet state of Russia...

Agreed.
It's a totally bizarre state of (international) affairs.

[scherzkeks]

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

Leaker unmasked. Surveillance started before Trumpo took office. Propaganda purveyors Bloomberg sat on the story to protect Obama officials.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/confirmed...

Taibbi on Russia Truth. With bonus mention of progressive PH conspiracy hero Louise Mensch.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taib...

Er, simple question for you. Why would so many members of Trump's team have such regular contact with so many Russians? If they hadn't been communicating with them then they wouldn't have been picked up by the surveillance.

Let's stick to suspect activity that we have evidence of: Any comment on the Podesta group lobbying to lift sanctions on the Kremlin?

Perhaps CNN will cover it when they are through investigating the origins of Russian dressing.

You mean the lobbying they carried out perfectly legally and declared on the Senate lobbying disclosure forms? On behalf of the US subsidiary of a Russian bank?

The guy who is largely behind Russia Truth lobbied to lift sanctions on the Kremlin and was involved in Uranium 1.

Let that sink in.

[Eric Mc]

zygalski said:

Eric Mc said:

America has been well and truly duped. Who would have imagined in the 21st Century that they would be living in a country effectively being run as a puppet state of Russia...

Agreed.
It's a totally bizarre state of (international) affairs.

Lenin is attributed as once saying "The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them."

Even if the quote isn't 100% true, I am sure that philosophy is still at the core of the way Putin thinks.

His approach would be - "Those idiots only value one thing, displays of wealth and "perceived" power. Let's feed them that illusion but at the same time, rope 'em in so much that we own them".

Trump and his team - and a segment of the American public - have been played like the dopes they are.

[jmorgan]

scherzkeks said:

The guy who is largely behind Russia Truth etc.

Didn't know there was a movement. Who is it?

[Funk]

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

Leaker unmasked. Surveillance started before Trumpo took office. Propaganda purveyors Bloomberg sat on the story to protect Obama officials.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/confirmed...

Taibbi on Russia Truth. With bonus mention of progressive PH conspiracy hero Louise Mensch.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taib...

Er, simple question for you. Why would so many members of Trump's team have such regular contact with so many Russians? If they hadn't been communicating with them then they wouldn't have been picked up by the surveillance.

Let's stick to suspect activity that we have evidence of: Any comment on the Podesta group lobbying to lift sanctions on the Kremlin?

Perhaps CNN will cover it when they are through investigating the origins of Russian dressing.

You mean the lobbying they carried out perfectly legally and declared on the Senate lobbying disclosure forms? On behalf of the US subsidiary of a Russian bank?

The guy who is largely behind Russia Truth lobbied to lift sanctions on the Kremlin and was involved in Uranium 1. Let that sink in.

[Eric Mc]

The only sinking going on is Trump's credibility.

[Zod]

scherzkeks said:

The guy who is largely behind Russia Truth lobbied to lift sanctions on the Kremlin and was involved in Uranium 1.

Let that sink in.

Serious stuff!

[babatunde]

Zod said:

Serious stuff!

Yep, this fker is POTUS, I still don't quite believe it.

[Countdown]

scherzkeks said:

Let that sink in.

It may just be my interpretation but I keep looking at the "evidence" and "links" you present and yet they actually either don't say anything at all to support what you're saying or are just loon ramblings (or both).

The fact that you're relying massively on a website like Zerohedge...doesn't that make you wonder whether it is you who is actually out on the loony fringes?

[Byker28i]

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

Leaker unmasked. Surveillance started before Trumpo took office. Propaganda purveyors Bloomberg sat on the story to protect Obama officials.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/confirmed...

Taibbi on Russia Truth. With bonus mention of progressive PH conspiracy hero Louise Mensch.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taib...

Er, simple question for you. Why would so many members of Trump's team have such regular contact with so many Russians? If they hadn't been communicating with them then they wouldn't have been picked up by the surveillance.

Let's stick to suspect activity that we have evidence of: Any comment on the Podesta group lobbying to lift sanctions on the Kremlin?

Perhaps CNN will cover it when they are through investigating the origins of Russian dressing.

You mean the lobbying they carried out perfectly legally and declared on the Senate lobbying disclosure forms? On behalf of the US subsidiary of a Russian bank?

The guy who is largely behind Russia Truth lobbied to lift sanctions on the Kremlin and was involved in Uranium 1.

Let that sink in.

You know the whole uranium thing has been debunked so many times, beit the clintons involvement or the inaccurate numbers the Donald throws around

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/20...

[jmorgan]

Not sure I am reading the correct flak over Rice but the questions should be why were Trump and associates caught and needed to be unmasked to know who they were. I get the impression someone has been caught with their hand in the cookie jar by someone turning the light on, and the one turning the light on is to blame according to the administration, not the tea leaf.

If you were in a position of authority and knew someone was doing dodgy dealing, is asking who it is illegal in the US?

[scherzkeks]

Byker28i said:

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

Leaker unmasked. Surveillance started before Trumpo took office. Propaganda purveyors Bloomberg sat on the story to protect Obama officials.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/confirmed...

Taibbi on Russia Truth. With bonus mention of progressive PH conspiracy hero Louise Mensch.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taib...

Er, simple question for you. Why would so many members of Trump's team have such regular contact with so many Russians? If they hadn't been communicating with them then they wouldn't have been picked up by the surveillance.

Let's stick to suspect activity that we have evidence of: Any comment on the Podesta group lobbying to lift sanctions on the Kremlin?

Perhaps CNN will cover it when they are through investigating the origins of Russian dressing.

You mean the lobbying they carried out perfectly legally and declared on the Senate lobbying disclosure forms? On behalf of the US subsidiary of a Russian bank?

The guy who is largely behind Russia Truth lobbied to lift sanctions on the Kremlin and was involved in Uranium 1.

Let that sink in.

You know the whole uranium thing has been debunked so many times, beit the clintons involvement or the inaccurate numbers the Donald throws around

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/20...

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release

Dig in.

[Byker28i]

scherzkeks said:

Byker28i said:

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

rscott said:

scherzkeks said:

Leaker unmasked. Surveillance started before Trumpo took office. Propaganda purveyors Bloomberg sat on the story to protect Obama officials.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-03/confirmed...

Taibbi on Russia Truth. With bonus mention of progressive PH conspiracy hero Louise Mensch.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taib...

Er, simple question for you. Why would so many members of Trump's team have such regular contact with so many Russians? If they hadn't been communicating with them then they wouldn't have been picked up by the surveillance.

Let's stick to suspect activity that we have evidence of: Any comment on the Podesta group lobbying to lift sanctions on the Kremlin?

Perhaps CNN will cover it when they are through investigating the origins of Russian dressing.

You mean the lobbying they carried out perfectly legally and declared on the Senate lobbying disclosure forms? On behalf of the US subsidiary of a Russian bank?

The guy who is largely behind Russia Truth lobbied to lift sanctions on the Kremlin and was involved in Uranium 1.

Let that sink in.

You know the whole uranium thing has been debunked so many times, beit the clintons involvement or the inaccurate numbers the Donald throws around

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/20...

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release

Dig in.

Jog on
Sorry is this wiki leaks that did it all off their own back, that no-one from Trumps team had contact with.

Oh Hang on

Roger Stone appeared on ABC news last week and refered to Russian hacker Guccifer 2.0 as 'her' having previously saying he'd had no contact with them. That had to be retracted after his twitter direct messages with 'her' were exposed
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/investigati...

So he had contact with WikiLeaks and the hacker who got the democrat emails, the best contact, so good he knows she was a woman, despite claiming no contact with either. The man who knew before hand about leaks, damaging exposures to the democrats before they happened during the campaign.

See March 27
https://twitter.com/foreignpolicy77

Those russian links just keep getting exposed.

[Zod]

scherzkeks said:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release

Dig in.

You obviously hope that your confident tone will persuade some that your links contain solid, convincing evidence.

Anyone who reads it looking for that will be disappointed unless possessed of such a credulous mind as yours.