Your voting intentions

Poll: Your voting intentions

Total Members Polled: 1201

Conservative : 22%
Labour: 28%
Reform: 13%
Lib-dem: 9%
Indy: 2%
Green: 3%
Not Voting for any of 'em. (Stay At Home).: 12%
Spoil Paper: 8%
SNP: 1%
Plaid Cymru: 0%
Author
Discussion

jshell

11,198 posts

207 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Rivenink said:
Castrol for a knave said:
JagLover said:
Dagnir said:
If you think the population of this country is as happy, fulfilled, stable, trustworthy, secure, safe, relaxed, prosperous etc. Etc. Etc. (You get the idea)......then you're simply living in a different country.


Focusing on a few modern, hot topics of social inequality (that were in their time far less here than most other countries!) in an attempt to drag down the past to justify your progressive mindset, is completely reductive, wholly misplaced and utterly contemptible.
That seems true enough

People seem to think they are living in more progressive times due to a few social issues as you highlight. There are two main problems with this however. Firstly that they are often imported from America, and American issues do not translate so well to here where the fundamental issue was always class rather than race. Secondly we are slowly transitioning from a mass middle class society to one that is far more stratified by wealth. So economically we are not becoming more progressive and comparing now to the 1990s shows stark differences.
If you happen to be gay, or ethnic minority, then we are living in more progressive times, Access to education and especially the workplace is far more open and quantifiably better than it was 20 years ago, and infinitely better than in the 80's and before.

This has, to an extent, been diverted by vested interests on the left and the right, arguing about whether my hamster can be gender fluid.

I agree regarding your comment about wealth. There is an element of society that is accelerating away and that's partly due to inherited wealth and partly due to opportunities provided to them by way of education and connections, that a good many will never see and never be able to leverage.
This is what the culture wars are all about, and why the Government has been so keen on stoking them.

It's all about creating every single distraction they can to divert attention away from the primary issue affecting everyones lives: the systematic transfer of wealth to the wealthiest in society. Keep them too busy raging about migrants and transgender people to think about where the hundreds and hundreds of billions of pounds of Quantative Easing ended up.
Yes. A lot of commentators saying that the talking points are thrown out for the masses to feed on whilst the wealth transfer and societal problems rumble on unabated.

This is why democracy is dead, they're not really even trying to keep up the pretence any more.

bitchstewie

52,336 posts

212 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Rivenink said:
This is what the culture wars are all about, and why the Government has been so keen on stoking them.

It's all about creating every single distraction they can to divert attention away from the primary issue affecting everyones lives: the systematic transfer of wealth to the wealthiest in society. Keep them too busy raging about migrants and transgender people to think about where the hundreds and hundreds of billions of pounds of Quantative Easing ended up.

cossy400

3,191 posts

186 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
chrispmartha said:
Jordie Barretts sock said:
Silvanus said:
cossy400 said:
So SKS is now doubting his manifesto and saying it might not happen due to the Tories ruining the economy.

It's nothing new to lie I suppose.
Which manifesto is this? Labour haven't released their manifesto yet.
I think it was a speech he made this morning (might have been yesterday) where he said his Govt will serve the people. We might not be able to all the things that a Labour Govt would do immediately because of fiscal constraints left over from the Conservative administration.

That's the paraphrase anyway.
So not a manifesto then.

Would you prefer them to lie to you and promise the earth?
You mean none of them tell us stuff then renegade on it....

Rishi and his 5 point plan etc
Now it ll be SKS and his bo$£%ks

Id scrap the lot of them and have one lot so we didnt have to listen to the childish chanting in the commons and they just got on with it.



bitchstewie

52,336 posts

212 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
jshell said:
I can't quite figure who the good and who the bad guys are any more.

But, I suppose that Trudeau inviting a literal Waffen SS member into the Canadian parliament didn't do him any damage, so this might not ruffle too many feathers.

How TF did we get here?
It's the old thing that more than one thing can be true at once isn't it.

You can absolutely support Ukraine fighting Russia's invasion and accept that means some pretty stty people will be involved in that fighting.

Accepting it doesn't mean that you have to welcome literal neo-nazi's into Parliament and be photographed with them holding their flag and call them “heroes”.

What on earth was Johnson thinking.

119

Original Poster:

7,211 posts

38 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
bhstewie said:
jshell said:
I can't quite figure who the good and who the bad guys are any more.

But, I suppose that Trudeau inviting a literal Waffen SS member into the Canadian parliament didn't do him any damage, so this might not ruffle too many feathers.

How TF did we get here?
It's the old thing that more than one thing can be true at once isn't it.

You can absolutely support Ukraine fighting Russia's invasion and accept that means some pretty stty people will be involved in that fighting.

Accepting it doesn't mean that you have to welcome literal neo-nazi's into Parliament and be photographed with them holding their flag and call them “heroes”.

What on earth was Johnson thinking.
God knows what Johnson has to do with the current election.

Jordie Barretts sock

4,982 posts

21 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Hasn't Sunak said he hasn't ruled out bringing him back?

White-Noise

4,374 posts

250 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
Hasn't Sunak said he hasn't ruled out bringing him back?
Yeah I saw that this morning

119

Original Poster:

7,211 posts

38 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
Hasn't Sunak said he hasn't ruled out bringing him back?
I haven’t seen anything about that, especially as they fell out a few years ago I think?

Jordie Barretts sock

4,982 posts

21 months

barryrs

4,420 posts

225 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Surely an attempt to appeal to potential Reform voters.

119

Original Poster:

7,211 posts

38 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
Ta. Didnt realise that was today.

thumbup

That'll make things interesting.

hehe

Jordie Barretts sock

4,982 posts

21 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
You would think so. They surely realise with Reform's vote share, they are neck and neck with Labour.

Silvanus

5,517 posts

25 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
You would think so. They surely realise with Reform's vote share, they are neck and neck with Labour.
I think you over estimate Reforms vote share

Jordie Barretts sock

4,982 posts

21 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Silvanus said:
Jordie Barretts sock said:
You would think so. They surely realise with Reform's vote share, they are neck and neck with Labour.
I think you over estimate Reforms vote share
Well, I haven't looked recently, but how far out am I...

Labour ~ 42%
Con ~ 25%
Ref ~ 12%



Killboy

7,661 posts

204 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
119 said:
bhstewie said:
jshell said:
I can't quite figure who the good and who the bad guys are any more.

But, I suppose that Trudeau inviting a literal Waffen SS member into the Canadian parliament didn't do him any damage, so this might not ruffle too many feathers.

How TF did we get here?
It's the old thing that more than one thing can be true at once isn't it.

You can absolutely support Ukraine fighting Russia's invasion and accept that means some pretty stty people will be involved in that fighting.

Accepting it doesn't mean that you have to welcome literal neo-nazi's into Parliament and be photographed with them holding their flag and call them “heroes”.

What on earth was Johnson thinking.
God knows what Johnson has to do with the current election.
I'd question Trudeau rather than Johnson, but hey-ho.

Evanivitch

20,716 posts

124 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
Silvanus said:
Jordie Barretts sock said:
You would think so. They surely realise with Reform's vote share, they are neck and neck with Labour.
I think you over estimate Reforms vote share
Well, I haven't looked recently, but how far out am I...

Labour ~ 42%
Con ~ 25%
Ref ~ 12%
Your posting in this thread is consistent, at the least laugh

Reform will go the same way as UKIP, lots of votes, no seats.

Jordie Barretts sock

4,982 posts

21 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
I agree. They're a fart in a thunderstorm.

I definitely don't support Reform! Now if you're looking for misogyny...

popeyewhite

20,226 posts

122 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Tory for me.
My prime motivation being the economy and I see no way on Earth that Labour will do better.

tangerine_sedge

4,909 posts

220 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
Tory for me.
My prime motivation being the economy and I see no way on Earth that Labour will do better.
Have you been in a coma for the last few years? hehe

Silvanus

5,517 posts

25 months

Friday 24th May
quotequote all
Jordie Barretts sock said:
Silvanus said:
Jordie Barretts sock said:
You would think so. They surely realise with Reform's vote share, they are neck and neck with Labour.
I think you over estimate Reforms vote share
Well, I haven't looked recently, but how far out am I...

Labour ~ 42%
Con ~ 25%
Ref ~ 12%
No one has actually voted yet