Climate change - the POLITICAL debate.

Climate change - the POLITICAL debate.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

dickymint

24,556 posts

260 months

turbobloke

104,353 posts

262 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Good. There must be more to be done on energy security, and a few (dozen) other daft ideas ripe for dumping now that Huhne is sidelined.

rovermorris999

5,203 posts

191 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
An interesting point on the earthquakes (perhaps 'tremors' would be a less emotional word to use) on R4 on 'Today' this morning. The chap who did the research for the government report made the point that the tremors were of a similar magnitude to those that have occurred for many decades due to coal mining and that plenty of a similar magnitude happen naturally in the area every year.

Andy Zarse

10,868 posts

249 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
fido said:
turbobloke said:
A powerful group of Conservative ministers has launched an attempt to torpedo the coalition’s flagship “green” home improvement scheme in a move which will spark a major new rift with the Liberal Democrats. Leading Tories inside and outside the cabinet believe the £14 billion “Green Deal” – due to start in six months’ time – must be ditched because it risks leaving key “squeezed middle” voters out of pocket by several thousands of pounds. A senior Tory source told The Sunday Telegraph last night: “The Green Deal was Chris Huhne’s baby. He has gone now and this is the right time to kill it off. Forcing people to pay thousands of pounds extra for unwanted home insulation is the last thing hard-pressed families need at the moment. It’s madness.”
Patrick Hennessy, The Sunday Telegraph, 15 April 2012
Not sure, if that deserves to be in the 'Anti-Green' category; 'Anti-Moronic-Ideas' would be more appropriate. Ironic that a so-called 'liberal' could force someone to improve their home!
On the other hand there's this article in The Guardian...

"It's hard to persuade those of the first view above to change their mind. They are a small minority in society and impervious to the evidence, but they are heavily over-represented among old, rightwing men, i.e the Conservative party."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carri...

Blib

44,362 posts

199 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
rovermorris999 said:
An interesting point on the earthquakes (perhaps 'tremors' would be a less emotional word to use) on R4 on 'Today' this morning. The chap who did the research for the government report made the point that the tremors were of a similar magnitude to those that have occurred for many decades due to coal mining and that plenty of a similar magnitude happen naturally in the area every year.
I heard this morning on the radio that the area of movement was within a radius of a couple of hundred metres and that the adjustment was in the region of one centimetre



IainT

10,040 posts

240 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
dickymint said:
Same report essentially in the telegraph...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/92...

Apache

39,731 posts

286 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
dickymint said:
Wow, that's gonna piss the Greenies off, and a few MPs I should think

Pointman

107 posts

150 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
A new blogger at the DT debuts with giving fracking a thumbs up and the Guardian a kicking.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/timworstall/1...

Pointman

turbobloke

104,353 posts

262 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Pointman said:
A new blogger at the DT debuts with giving fracking a thumbs up and the Guardian a kicking.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/timworstall/1...

Pointman
Thanks for the heads up. The guy is right we need to avoid forward-to-the-Middle-Ages but while in transit we need to avoid sideways-to-the-Dark-Ages as well.

Also while travelling through poor reception this morning did I really catch the unbiased BBC ho ho courtesy of Radio 4 which I caught bits of and which seemed to be airing the most blatant mythology about shale gas, I even thought I heard a repeat of the 'flaming taps in the kitchen' jibberish. And as a big surprise The Guardian's coverage was mentioned. But to cap it all I thought I heard our good friend Juniper hard at it, but no sign of any counterbalancing views signalling how even handed and impartial the BBC are. Clearly I missed these balancing acts when radio reception was dodgy. Then again maybe not.



turbobloke

104,353 posts

262 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Right on Cue.

Britain Gives Shale Gas Fracking Green Light

The UK government on Tuesday backed the exploration of shale gas nearly one year after it temporarily banned the drilling method which triggered two earthquakes in Britain but that has also revolutionised the U.S. energy market. An expert report commissioned by the government said shale gas fracking, a process where pressurised water and chemicals are pumped underground to open shale rocks and release trapped gas, was safe to resume with tighter rules on seismic monitoring and drilling surveys.
Alessandra Prentice, Reuters, 17 April 2012

Lancashire is set to become the centre of Britain’s energy future, after regulators gave the green light for fracking to return. A report published today by the Department for Energy and Climate Change said that energy giant Cuadrilla Resources should be allowed to restart work at its drilling rig in the Lancashire countryside.
Lancashire Evening Post, 17 April 2012

Blast From the Middle Ages Past

Chris Huhne in particular is renowned for his uninhibited antagonism towards natural gas. At the Liberal Democrat party conference in Birmingham last week he promised to halt a new "dash for gas" because it would undermine the UK's unilateral climate targets. David Cameron would be well advised not to allow his green minister to squander Britain's golden shale gas opportunity.
Benny Peiser, Public Service Europe, 27 September 2011

Mr GrimNasty

8,172 posts

172 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
With any luck they'll trigger a quake big enough to take out a few wind farms like dominoes.

Blib

44,362 posts

199 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Thanks for the heads up. The guy is right we need to avoid forward-to-the-Middle-Ages but while in transit we need to avoid sideways-to-the-Dark-Ages as well.

Also while travelling through poor reception this morning did I really catch the unbiased BBC ho ho courtesy of Radio 4 which I caught bits of and which seemed to be airing the most blatant mythology about shale gas, I even thought I heard a repeat of the 'flaming taps in the kitchen' jibberish. And as a big surprise The Guardian's coverage was mentioned. But to cap it all I thought I heard our good friend Juniper hard at it, but no sign of any counterbalancing views signalling how even handed and impartial the BBC are. Clearly I missed these balancing acts when radio reception was dodgy. Then again maybe not.
Juniper was on Five Live this morning. His comments sandwiched an interesting interview with a Canadian fracking expert. Juniper huffed and puffed about the usual stuff. Listing Global warming, earthquakes, water contamintion, etc.

The Canadian chap merely stated his case. Admitting that there were issues that need regulation and enforcement and mentioned that there were many thousands of wells in North America, none of which had caused any major or even significant earthquakes.

Juniper was allowed to retort, of course, He merely blustered once more. I enjoyed that the Canadian totally ignored Juniper and his 'points'.

Finally, Juniper was introduced as Jupiter by the interviewer. Which peeved him somewhat.


turbobloke

104,353 posts

262 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
At least there were two sides aired in that one, though it's remotely possible that the R4 Toady (for that is it) programme did likewise and it all happened in the poor reception zones.

Next time they should introduce him as Phill Jupitus. Or Jennifer Juniper. Just for fun of course.

Blib

44,362 posts

199 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Juniper was allowed to top and tail the Canadian who was only allowed one bite of the cherry. I expected as much, TBH. If it was up to folk like Juniper, we wouldn't have left the trees.

turbobloke

104,353 posts

262 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
And will soon be restricted to caves.

Jaged

3,598 posts

196 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Just seen some Greeie on Ch4 News saying we should not be opening up a new Carbon intensive fuel source.

When will they ask some (retired of course) Scientists onto these news shows??


Anyway, we used Fracking down here in rural Hampshire back in 2006/7!

Did anyone notice?

Blib

44,362 posts

199 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Winchester, earlier.


loafer123

15,475 posts

217 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Jaged said:
Anyway, we used Fracking down here in rural Hampshire back in 2006/7!

Did anyone notice?
That explains Gosport.

dickymint

24,556 posts

260 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
Pointman said:
A new blogger at the DT debuts with giving fracking a thumbs up and the Guardian a kicking.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/timworstall/1...

Pointman
"Do we all get to be warm and toasty for a century or more or do more pictures fall off Lancastrian walls as they shake and tremble alongside the piercing of Gaia's veil?
Put like that's it's pretty clear isn't it? Sorry, Blackpool."

rofl

S7Paul

2,103 posts

236 months

Tuesday 17th April 2012
quotequote all
loafer123 said:
That explains Gosport.
Yep, utterly destroyed the whole town - nearly £15 worth of damage.

(The old ones are always the best.)
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED