Snap General Election?

[LDN]

turbobloke said:

MaxSo said:

I'm out. Enjoy your evening

MaxSo said:

Just the circle jerkers left now. Have fun boys.

Out a minute or two ago, now In,

What a U-turn up for the books. U-turning is bad, right?

OK.

Eh? Gibberish.

[sidicks]

LDN said:

Eh? Gibberish.

It makes perfect sense to me - is English not your first language?

[turbobloke]

LDN said:

turbobloke said:

MaxSo said:

I'm out. Enjoy your evening

MaxSo said:

Just the circle jerkers left now. Have fun boys.

Out a minute or two ago, now In,

What a U-turn up for the books. U-turning is bad, right?

OK.

Eh? Gibberish.

Righto. Allow me to explain for the hard of thinking which on the basis of evidence includes you.

At 2125 hrs somebody was Out. They said "i'm out" which means they were leaving the discussion.

At 2126 hrs that same person posted again, showing that they had U-turned on being Out as they were clearly In again.

The same person posted to the effect that U-turning is culpable, then did it themselves.

If you think that's gibberish, you need a very basic lesson in comprehension.

[turbobloke]

sidicks said:

LDN said:

Eh? Gibberish.

It makes perfect sense to me - is English not your first language?

Or maybe thinking was bypassed with a spinal cord knee-jerk.

[LDN]

turbobloke said:

LDN said:

turbobloke said:

MaxSo said:

I'm out. Enjoy your evening

MaxSo said:

Just the circle jerkers left now. Have fun boys.

Out a minute or two ago, now In,

What a U-turn up for the books. U-turning is bad, right?

OK.

Eh? Gibberish.

Righto. Allow me to explain for the hard of thinking which on the basis of evidence includes you.

At 2125 hrs somebody was Out. They said "i'm out" which means they were leaving the discussion.

At 2126 hrs that same person posted again, showing that they had U-turned on being Out as they were clearly In again.

If you think that's gibberish, you need a very basic lesson in comprehension.

So you're saying it's not gibberish; just a massively crap joke???

Gotcha.

[Stickyfinger]

Stickyfinger said:

Stickyfinger said:

MaxSo said:

give it rest...

can you tell me the logic behind

Knocked up at 16, left school without any qualifications.....worked as a "care assistant", became Union Rep, joined Labour, got shoe'd in on a safe seat controlled by Momentum/Unions, given Shadow EDUCUMACATION Minister job.

Please enlighten me about Mr Corbyn's thinking

Come on, tell me why and I may vote Labour....or do you just "do" sock-puppetry ?

MaxSo said:

Stickyfinger said:

Come on, tell me why and I may vote Labour....or do you just "do" sock-puppetry ?

Give it a rest

Still waiting....or like them you do not have the skills ?~



Which is it, cheep "one liners" or some intelligent explanation ?

Ladies and Gents.....Labour Quality at its best....or did mummy tell him to go to bed ?

Edited by Stickyfinger on Monday 22 May 21:37

[Moonhawk]

turbobloke said:

At 2125 hrs somebody was Out. They said "i'm out" which means they were leaving the discussion.

At 2126 hrs that same person posted again, showing that they had U-turned on being Out as they were clearly In again.

A u-turn on a flounce

[turbobloke]

LDN said:

So you're saying it's not gibberish; just a massively crap joke???

Gotcha.

You're saying it all, on behalf of others, when you can't follow the most basic of points - the implications are clear.

[sidicks]

LDN said:

So you're saying it's not gibberish; just a massively crap joke???
Gotcha.

It's certainly not gibberish, that's quite clear.

The quality of the joke is subjective, but it clearly went over your head, that's for sure.

[LDN]

turbobloke said:

LDN said:

So you're saying it's not gibberish; just a massively crap joke???

Gotcha.

You're saying it all, on behalf of others, when you can't follow the most basic of points - the implications are clear.

The implication is; you're no comedian

Back on topic I say...

[sidicks]

LDN said:

The implication is; you're no comedian

Back on topic I say...

The implication is that you weren't clever enough to understand the joke!

But back on topic would be good.

[LDN]

sidicks said:

LDN said:

The implication is; you're no comedian

Back on topic I say...

The implication is that you weren't clever enough to understand the joke!

I got the joke; then thought; 'no, it's so poor; surely he must mean something else..'

Sorry to disappoint old chap.

[sidicks]

LDN said:

I got the joke; then thought; 'no, it's so poor; surely he must mean something else..'

Sorry to disappoint old chap.

Evidence suggests otherwise.

[alfie2244]

turbobloke said:

LDN said:

turbobloke said:

MaxSo said:

I'm out. Enjoy your evening

MaxSo said:

Just the circle jerkers left now. Have fun boys.

Out a minute or two ago, now In,

What a U-turn up for the books. U-turning is bad, right?

OK.

Eh? Gibberish.

Righto. Allow me to explain for the hard of thinking which on the basis of evidence includes you.

At 2125 hrs somebody was Out. They said "i'm out" which means they were leaving the discussion.

At 2126 hrs that same person posted again, showing that they had U-turned on being Out as they were clearly In again.

The same person posted to the effect that U-turning is culpable, then did it themselves.

If you think that's gibberish, you need a very basic lesson in comprehension.

I am surprised that you even bothered to explain TBH

[BigMon]

Isn't the salient point here that, given the open goal that Corbyn and his bunch of muppets present, May and the Tories should be just running forward and slotting the ball into the net.

So far she's bent down, fumbled with her laces, taken a miskick and currently appears to be jogging towards the corner flag while a baying crowd are bellowing at her to just score for flocks sake.

I cannot imagine a scenario where Labour get into power, but the Tories are making a massive pigs ear out of what should be a really simple task.

[sidicks]

BigMon said:

Isn't the salient point here that, given the open goal that Corbyn and his bunch of muppets present, May and the Tories should be just running forward and slotting the ball into the net.

So far she's bent down, fumbled with her laces, taken a miskick and currently appears to be jogging towards the corner flag while a baying crowd are bellowing at her to just score for flocks sake.

I cannot imagine a scenario where Labour get into power, but the Tories are making a massive pigs ear out of what should be a really simple task.

That's reasonably fair, I think.

[turbobloke]

LDN said:

turbobloke said:

LDN said:

So you're saying it's not gibberish; just a massively crap joke???

Gotcha.

You're saying it all, on behalf of others, when you can't follow the most basic of points - the implications are clear.

The implication is; you're no comedian

Back on topic I say...

Correct, and there was no joke in any of my posts anyway, so your comment is pointless and irrelevant.

Feel free to have yet another wriggly and obscure last word in defence of an indefensible, horrendous, culpable U-turn if you wish, we can get back on track whenever you want.

After all, it's a U-turn, what could possibly be worse?

[Jockman]

Carl_Manchester said:

The only thing that got skewered today was Jeremy Hunt.

The manifesto pledges stay intact.

Whether that constitutes a stunning U-Turn is up for debate but the usual bleeting from the press seems to be in the 'throw a dog a bone' category looking for any possible positive to pull out of the abyss which is the Labour election campaign.

Looks like a 45% common vote landslide rather than a record 49%+

I would like to drive some of the people bleeting about the unfairness of this policy down to a leafy London suburb, stuffed to the brim with geriatrics, living on their own, sitting in 4/5 bedroom semi-detached houses worth £850k-£1m that they cant even get up the stairs in.

Their kids won't care for them, some of them just want their parents to pop their clogs at the nearest possible opportunity and not visit them once they go into care.

I have been there and seen it all happen and the situation repeat itself first hand. Society cannot be trusted to pay for itself on this count.

And so it falls currently to the state to pay for their care and I am at a total loss how the Tories are promoting this policy and the so called 'socialists' are laughing at it.

Somehow it is fairer that instead of their kids paying, I pay instead. Well bravo on that one Labour, that is a real vote winner. While you are at it, why don't you make me pay for their kids University tuition so they can attend a 'Media Studies' degree as well.

Oh wait, you are doing that aswell? Grand, just grand.

The question remains in the air, however. Why include it in a manifesto?

Were the dividend tax hikes and the limitations on landlord tax relief included in the 2015 manifesto?

I genuinely don't know !!

[alfie2244]

Moonhawk said:

turbobloke said:

At 2125 hrs somebody was Out. They said "i'm out" which means they were leaving the discussion.

At 2126 hrs that same person posted again, showing that they had U-turned on being Out as they were clearly In again.

A u-turn on a flounce

[turbobloke]

sidicks said:

BigMon said:

Isn't the salient point here that, given the open goal that Corbyn and his bunch of muppets present, May and the Tories should be just running forward and slotting the ball into the net.

So far she's bent down, fumbled with her laces, taken a miskick and currently appears to be jogging towards the corner flag while a baying crowd are bellowing at her to just score for flocks sake.

I cannot imagine a scenario where Labour get into power, but the Tories are making a massive pigs ear out of what should be a really simple task.

That's reasonably fair, I think.

Likewise.

May is still the best of a bad bunch and the Conservatives remain the least worst option.