James Stunts business’ raided, days after brothers death
Discussion
Giving away gold bars...generous chap all the same:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8978347/J...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8978347/J...
I’ve been close to a family recently that has far from abided by rules and has quite literally found them funny for their gain.
I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
Petrus1983 said:
I’ve been close to a family recently that has far from abided by rules and has quite literally found them funny for their gain.
I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
You don’t mean récupérations, you mean repercussions.I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
loafer123 said:
Petrus1983 said:
I’ve been close to a family recently that has far from abided by rules and has quite literally found them funny for their gain.
I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
You don’t mean récupérations, you mean repercussions.I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
Petrus1983 said:
I’ve been close to a family recently that has far from abided by rules and has quite literally found them funny for their gain.
I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
World we live in, the UK I think to many seems like a lawful non corrupt society in reality we are no different to any other just better at not letting the mask slip. Crime paysI’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
Been following this for a while and trying to scratch the surface
Personally I think he had a bit of money and a lot of Front, met a rather rich lady and used his allowance to play big roller poker tables and pay for a huge convoy to follow him around
There is bugger all about past companies, you dont earn billions without a trail.
There is also bugger all negative information online, apart from Mail/Sun stories. This however probably explains why: https://www.1cor.com/brighton/2019/06/07/paul-ashw...
Id imagine hes been paying websheriff for a few years to "cleanse" peoples online opinions on him and there have been various cease and desist letters sent out when you claim anything at all....probably from Web Sheriff , who he failed to pay. The blogs I've read on him have been removed from Google results and sent pictures of the cease and desist letters.
Then you have his "old masters" art collection, well spend a bit of time reading through this little lot:
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/jamesstunt/
Essentially it looks like he been using the services of a certain Tony in Florida to produce paintings, paintings that ended up in Charlies castle and also paintings he used as leverage to get large loans , mainly when his other half left him and the pocket money stopped..... Some of the loans went ahead others were refused when it came to light the paintings were fakes
Then you have the ML........I imagine he was used used as a Front for certain people to clean their dirty stuff, easy enough when you have a gold business. Im sure this will all come out the wash
Id like to know if his claimed "godfather" is his actual godfather and if so that means his parents knew him well......
Or did the Godfather just latch on to him and pump and dump him
PS: Another video, qtch it whilst you can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk6lMhdMk8Q
Personally I think he had a bit of money and a lot of Front, met a rather rich lady and used his allowance to play big roller poker tables and pay for a huge convoy to follow him around
There is bugger all about past companies, you dont earn billions without a trail.
There is also bugger all negative information online, apart from Mail/Sun stories. This however probably explains why: https://www.1cor.com/brighton/2019/06/07/paul-ashw...
Id imagine hes been paying websheriff for a few years to "cleanse" peoples online opinions on him and there have been various cease and desist letters sent out when you claim anything at all....probably from Web Sheriff , who he failed to pay. The blogs I've read on him have been removed from Google results and sent pictures of the cease and desist letters.
Then you have his "old masters" art collection, well spend a bit of time reading through this little lot:
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/jamesstunt/
Essentially it looks like he been using the services of a certain Tony in Florida to produce paintings, paintings that ended up in Charlies castle and also paintings he used as leverage to get large loans , mainly when his other half left him and the pocket money stopped..... Some of the loans went ahead others were refused when it came to light the paintings were fakes
Then you have the ML........I imagine he was used used as a Front for certain people to clean their dirty stuff, easy enough when you have a gold business. Im sure this will all come out the wash
Id like to know if his claimed "godfather" is his actual godfather and if so that means his parents knew him well......
Or did the Godfather just latch on to him and pump and dump him
PS: Another video, qtch it whilst you can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk6lMhdMk8Q
Burwood said:
loafer123 said:
Petrus1983 said:
I’ve been close to a family recently that has far from abided by rules and has quite literally found them funny for their gain.
I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
You don’t mean récupérations, you mean repercussions.I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
I was trying to be helpful.
MX5Biologist said:
No aUK diplomatic passport. You can buy diplomatic passports from many countries.
https://www.dw.com/en/diplomatic-passports-pouches...
that's pretty cool!https://www.dw.com/en/diplomatic-passports-pouches...
TwistingMyMelon said:
Been following this for a while and trying to scratch the surface
Personally I think he had a bit of money and a lot of Front, met a rather rich lady and used his allowance to play big roller poker tables and pay for a huge convoy to follow him around
There is bugger all about past companies, you dont earn billions without a trail.
There is also bugger all negative information online, apart from Mail/Sun stories. This however probably explains why: https://www.1cor.com/brighton/2019/06/07/paul-ashw...
Id imagine hes been paying websheriff for a few years to "cleanse" peoples online opinions on him and there have been various cease and desist letters sent out when you claim anything at all....probably from Web Sheriff , who he failed to pay. The blogs I've read on him have been removed from Google results and sent pictures of the cease and desist letters.
Then you have his "old masters" art collection, well spend a bit of time reading through this little lot:
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/jamesstunt/
Essentially it looks like he been using the services of a certain Tony in Florida to produce paintings, paintings that ended up in Charlies castle and also paintings he used as leverage to get large loans , mainly when his other half left him and the pocket money stopped..... Some of the loans went ahead others were refused when it came to light the paintings were fakes
Then you have the ML........I imagine he was used used as a Front for certain people to clean their dirty stuff, easy enough when you have a gold business. Im sure this will all come out the wash
Id like to know if his claimed "godfather" is his actual godfather and if so that means his parents knew him well......
Or did the Godfather just latch on to him and pump and dump him
PS: Another video, qtch it whilst you can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk6lMhdMk8Q
I went to school with people like this (went to a posh boarding school), all mouth and no trousers and also borderline psychiatric illness. Is his name even James Stunt? Personally I think he had a bit of money and a lot of Front, met a rather rich lady and used his allowance to play big roller poker tables and pay for a huge convoy to follow him around
There is bugger all about past companies, you dont earn billions without a trail.
There is also bugger all negative information online, apart from Mail/Sun stories. This however probably explains why: https://www.1cor.com/brighton/2019/06/07/paul-ashw...
Id imagine hes been paying websheriff for a few years to "cleanse" peoples online opinions on him and there have been various cease and desist letters sent out when you claim anything at all....probably from Web Sheriff , who he failed to pay. The blogs I've read on him have been removed from Google results and sent pictures of the cease and desist letters.
Then you have his "old masters" art collection, well spend a bit of time reading through this little lot:
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/jamesstunt/
Essentially it looks like he been using the services of a certain Tony in Florida to produce paintings, paintings that ended up in Charlies castle and also paintings he used as leverage to get large loans , mainly when his other half left him and the pocket money stopped..... Some of the loans went ahead others were refused when it came to light the paintings were fakes
Then you have the ML........I imagine he was used used as a Front for certain people to clean their dirty stuff, easy enough when you have a gold business. Im sure this will all come out the wash
Id like to know if his claimed "godfather" is his actual godfather and if so that means his parents knew him well......
Or did the Godfather just latch on to him and pump and dump him
PS: Another video, qtch it whilst you can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk6lMhdMk8Q
TwistingMyMelon said:
Been following this for a while and trying to scratch the surface
Personally I think he had a bit of money and a lot of Front, met a rather rich lady and used his allowance to play big roller poker tables and pay for a huge convoy to follow him around
There is bugger all about past companies, you dont earn billions without a trail.
There is also bugger all negative information online, apart from Mail/Sun stories. This however probably explains why: https://www.1cor.com/brighton/2019/06/07/paul-ashw...
Id imagine hes been paying websheriff for a few years to "cleanse" peoples online opinions on him and there have been various cease and desist letters sent out when you claim anything at all....probably from Web Sheriff , who he failed to pay. The blogs I've read on him have been removed from Google results and sent pictures of the cease and desist letters.
Then you have his "old masters" art collection, well spend a bit of time reading through this little lot:
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/jamesstunt/
Essentially it looks like he been using the services of a certain Tony in Florida to produce paintings, paintings that ended up in Charlies castle and also paintings he used as leverage to get large loans , mainly when his other half left him and the pocket money stopped..... Some of the loans went ahead others were refused when it came to light the paintings were fakes
Then you have the ML........I imagine he was used used as a Front for certain people to clean their dirty stuff, easy enough when you have a gold business. Im sure this will all come out the wash
Id like to know if his claimed "godfather" is his actual godfather and if so that means his parents knew him well......
Or did the Godfather just latch on to him and pump and dump him
PS: Another video, qtch it whilst you can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk6lMhdMk8Q
I'll be surprised if this post lasts, I had a reply in this thread deleted for far less than thisPersonally I think he had a bit of money and a lot of Front, met a rather rich lady and used his allowance to play big roller poker tables and pay for a huge convoy to follow him around
There is bugger all about past companies, you dont earn billions without a trail.
There is also bugger all negative information online, apart from Mail/Sun stories. This however probably explains why: https://www.1cor.com/brighton/2019/06/07/paul-ashw...
Id imagine hes been paying websheriff for a few years to "cleanse" peoples online opinions on him and there have been various cease and desist letters sent out when you claim anything at all....probably from Web Sheriff , who he failed to pay. The blogs I've read on him have been removed from Google results and sent pictures of the cease and desist letters.
Then you have his "old masters" art collection, well spend a bit of time reading through this little lot:
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/jamesstunt/
Essentially it looks like he been using the services of a certain Tony in Florida to produce paintings, paintings that ended up in Charlies castle and also paintings he used as leverage to get large loans , mainly when his other half left him and the pocket money stopped..... Some of the loans went ahead others were refused when it came to light the paintings were fakes
Then you have the ML........I imagine he was used used as a Front for certain people to clean their dirty stuff, easy enough when you have a gold business. Im sure this will all come out the wash
Id like to know if his claimed "godfather" is his actual godfather and if so that means his parents knew him well......
Or did the Godfather just latch on to him and pump and dump him
PS: Another video, qtch it whilst you can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk6lMhdMk8Q
Oakey said:
TwistingMyMelon said:
Been following this for a while and trying to scratch the surface
Personally I think he had a bit of money and a lot of Front, met a rather rich lady and used his allowance to play big roller poker tables and pay for a huge convoy to follow him around
There is bugger all about past companies, you dont earn billions without a trail.
There is also bugger all negative information online, apart from Mail/Sun stories. This however probably explains why: https://www.1cor.com/brighton/2019/06/07/paul-ashw...
Id imagine hes been paying websheriff for a few years to "cleanse" peoples online opinions on him and there have been various cease and desist letters sent out when you claim anything at all....probably from Web Sheriff , who he failed to pay. The blogs I've read on him have been removed from Google results and sent pictures of the cease and desist letters.
Then you have his "old masters" art collection, well spend a bit of time reading through this little lot:
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/jamesstunt/
Essentially it looks like he been using the services of a certain Tony in Florida to produce paintings, paintings that ended up in Charlies castle and also paintings he used as leverage to get large loans , mainly when his other half left him and the pocket money stopped..... Some of the loans went ahead others were refused when it came to light the paintings were fakes
Then you have the ML........I imagine he was used used as a Front for certain people to clean their dirty stuff, easy enough when you have a gold business. Im sure this will all come out the wash
Id like to know if his claimed "godfather" is his actual godfather and if so that means his parents knew him well......
Or did the Godfather just latch on to him and pump and dump him
PS: Another video, qtch it whilst you can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk6lMhdMk8Q
I'll be surprised if this post lasts, I had a reply in this thread deleted for far less than thisPersonally I think he had a bit of money and a lot of Front, met a rather rich lady and used his allowance to play big roller poker tables and pay for a huge convoy to follow him around
There is bugger all about past companies, you dont earn billions without a trail.
There is also bugger all negative information online, apart from Mail/Sun stories. This however probably explains why: https://www.1cor.com/brighton/2019/06/07/paul-ashw...
Id imagine hes been paying websheriff for a few years to "cleanse" peoples online opinions on him and there have been various cease and desist letters sent out when you claim anything at all....probably from Web Sheriff , who he failed to pay. The blogs I've read on him have been removed from Google results and sent pictures of the cease and desist letters.
Then you have his "old masters" art collection, well spend a bit of time reading through this little lot:
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/jamesstunt/
Essentially it looks like he been using the services of a certain Tony in Florida to produce paintings, paintings that ended up in Charlies castle and also paintings he used as leverage to get large loans , mainly when his other half left him and the pocket money stopped..... Some of the loans went ahead others were refused when it came to light the paintings were fakes
Then you have the ML........I imagine he was used used as a Front for certain people to clean their dirty stuff, easy enough when you have a gold business. Im sure this will all come out the wash
Id like to know if his claimed "godfather" is his actual godfather and if so that means his parents knew him well......
Or did the Godfather just latch on to him and pump and dump him
PS: Another video, qtch it whilst you can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk6lMhdMk8Q
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
loafer123 said:
Petrus1983 said:
I’ve been close to a family recently that has far from abided by rules and has quite literally found them funny for their gain.
I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
You don’t mean récupérations, you mean repercussions.I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
Petrus1983 said:
loafer123 said:
Petrus1983 said:
I’ve been close to a family recently that has far from abided by rules and has quite literally found them funny for their gain.
I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
You don’t mean récupérations, you mean repercussions.I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
I did wonder about the proliferation of accents!
loafer123 said:
Petrus1983 said:
loafer123 said:
Petrus1983 said:
I’ve been close to a family recently that has far from abided by rules and has quite literally found them funny for their gain.
I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
You don’t mean récupérations, you mean repercussions.I’m not like that and we’re distanced - but it did make me realise how easy it was - and more importantly relatively low récupérations - which never seemed to happen.
I did wonder about the proliferation of accents!
n3il123 said:
Oakey said:
TwistingMyMelon said:
Been following this for a while and trying to scratch the surface
Personally I think he had a bit of money and a lot of Front, met a rather rich lady and used his allowance to play big roller poker tables and pay for a huge convoy to follow him around
There is bugger all about past companies, you dont earn billions without a trail.
There is also bugger all negative information online, apart from Mail/Sun stories. This however probably explains why: https://www.1cor.com/brighton/2019/06/07/paul-ashw...
Id imagine hes been paying websheriff for a few years to "cleanse" peoples online opinions on him and there have been various cease and desist letters sent out when you claim anything at all....probably from Web Sheriff , who he failed to pay. The blogs I've read on him have been removed from Google results and sent pictures of the cease and desist letters.
Then you have his "old masters" art collection, well spend a bit of time reading through this little lot:
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/jamesstunt/
Essentially it looks like he been using the services of a certain Tony in Florida to produce paintings, paintings that ended up in Charlies castle and also paintings he used as leverage to get large loans , mainly when his other half left him and the pocket money stopped..... Some of the loans went ahead others were refused when it came to light the paintings were fakes
Then you have the ML........I imagine he was used used as a Front for certain people to clean their dirty stuff, easy enough when you have a gold business. Im sure this will all come out the wash
Id like to know if his claimed "godfather" is his actual godfather and if so that means his parents knew him well......
Or did the Godfather just latch on to him and pump and dump him
PS: Another video, qtch it whilst you can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk6lMhdMk8Q
I'll be surprised if this post lasts, I had a reply in this thread deleted for far less than thisPersonally I think he had a bit of money and a lot of Front, met a rather rich lady and used his allowance to play big roller poker tables and pay for a huge convoy to follow him around
There is bugger all about past companies, you dont earn billions without a trail.
There is also bugger all negative information online, apart from Mail/Sun stories. This however probably explains why: https://www.1cor.com/brighton/2019/06/07/paul-ashw...
Id imagine hes been paying websheriff for a few years to "cleanse" peoples online opinions on him and there have been various cease and desist letters sent out when you claim anything at all....probably from Web Sheriff , who he failed to pay. The blogs I've read on him have been removed from Google results and sent pictures of the cease and desist letters.
Then you have his "old masters" art collection, well spend a bit of time reading through this little lot:
https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/jamesstunt/
Essentially it looks like he been using the services of a certain Tony in Florida to produce paintings, paintings that ended up in Charlies castle and also paintings he used as leverage to get large loans , mainly when his other half left him and the pocket money stopped..... Some of the loans went ahead others were refused when it came to light the paintings were fakes
Then you have the ML........I imagine he was used used as a Front for certain people to clean their dirty stuff, easy enough when you have a gold business. Im sure this will all come out the wash
Id like to know if his claimed "godfather" is his actual godfather and if so that means his parents knew him well......
Or did the Godfather just latch on to him and pump and dump him
PS: Another video, qtch it whilst you can: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tk6lMhdMk8Q
![smile](/inc/images/smile.gif)
Im just listing my thoughts, anything listed above is available on google and I make no qualms to it being true
What's wrong with the chaps post above? The Art has been proven, fake and the ex con, artist has confirmed he was paid to create said Art. Look up Dan Bilzerian. Another faker who claimed to have made 100m gambling and trading when the truth is it trust fund money his father illegal scammed in New York(and served prison for securities fraud). How he got away with it just shows you how lame the laws actually are. The feds go after balzerian senior and poof the money is in a trust and the father files for bankruptcy.
All the money Stunt had has been frozen by the authorities as they suspect he is a criminal and I would wager you don't get such an order with just light weight evidence. The prior lifestyle is that which is being reported. (up till 2018). He has no such means now. That was all Bernies money via his daughter(via a trust his ex wife controls).
The back story of oil, shipping etc is all made up rubbish to try and legitimise large sums of money-a cover if you like. Pretty lame.
According to the papers he is about to be charged formerly with laundering money and art forgery. He is a bankrupt. My guess he will end up in prison but say it's all a stitch up.
All the money Stunt had has been frozen by the authorities as they suspect he is a criminal and I would wager you don't get such an order with just light weight evidence. The prior lifestyle is that which is being reported. (up till 2018). He has no such means now. That was all Bernies money via his daughter(via a trust his ex wife controls).
The back story of oil, shipping etc is all made up rubbish to try and legitimise large sums of money-a cover if you like. Pretty lame.
According to the papers he is about to be charged formerly with laundering money and art forgery. He is a bankrupt. My guess he will end up in prison but say it's all a stitch up.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff