3rd Iranian Nuclear Scientist Killed
Discussion
ChiChoAndy said:
Countdown said:
ChiChoAndy said:
True, but that does not mean they are attempting to get to the higher percentage of enrichment. It simply means they are producing more of the 20% enriched stuff. Having more gas centrifuges does not mean they are trying to get weapons grade material. An increase in production does not equal an attempt to get weapons grade.
Other countries have offered to supply low-enriched uranium to the Iranians. If that was all they wanted then why not just buy it (thereby avoding sanctions)?If it was genuinely for non-military means the Israelis and the US would not be as concerned as they are, IMO of course.
Countdown said:
Guess we're going to have to differ on this one
If it was genuinely for non-military means the Israelis and the US would not be as concerned as they are, IMO of course.
I think Irans invasion history stands for itself. I'd be more concerned by Israel and its refusal to sign the NPT.If it was genuinely for non-military means the Israelis and the US would not be as concerned as they are, IMO of course.
ChiChoAndy said:
Countdown said:
Guess we're going to have to differ on this one
If it was genuinely for non-military means the Israelis and the US would not be as concerned as they are, IMO of course.
I think Irans invasion history stands for itself. I'd be more concerned by Israel and its refusal to sign the NPT.If it was genuinely for non-military means the Israelis and the US would not be as concerned as they are, IMO of course.
Countdown said:
ChiChoAndy said:
Countdown said:
Guess we're going to have to differ on this one
If it was genuinely for non-military means the Israelis and the US would not be as concerned as they are, IMO of course.
I think Irans invasion history stands for itself. I'd be more concerned by Israel and its refusal to sign the NPT.If it was genuinely for non-military means the Israelis and the US would not be as concerned as they are, IMO of course.
Mossad getting busy
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-165015...
same style same job description!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-165015...
same style same job description!
bbc said:
A university lecturer and nuclear scientist has been killed in a car explosion in north Tehran.
Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan, an academic who also worked at the Natanz uranium enrichment facility, and the driver of the car were killed in the attack.
The blast happened after a motorcyclist stuck an apparent bomb to the car.
Several Iranian nuclear scientists have been assassinated in recent years, with Iran blaming Israel and the US. Both countries deny the accusations.
Mostafa Ahmadi-Roshan, an academic who also worked at the Natanz uranium enrichment facility, and the driver of the car were killed in the attack.
The blast happened after a motorcyclist stuck an apparent bomb to the car.
Several Iranian nuclear scientists have been assassinated in recent years, with Iran blaming Israel and the US. Both countries deny the accusations.
Jimbeaux said:
thinfourth2 said:
Well we can pretty rule out the yanks on this one
No crashed helicopters and only 2 people killed
We can rule out MI-6 as well too.....someone killed, no apologies issued, no council houses in Britain being readied for 50 of his closest relatives.No crashed helicopters and only 2 people killed
Jimbeaux said:
Iranian nuke scientists are killed in this manner over a few years: A motorcycle rides up in traffic and places a "sticky" bomb on the passenger window and rides off, the mini-bomb goes off killing only the scientist, 007 style. This is interesting. Two schools of thought:
1) It is the Israelis, CIA, MI-6, or assorted Western interests.
2) It is Saudia Arabia because there is an undercurrent battle between the Arab Saudis and the Persian Iranians for dominance in both the ME and the Islamic "world".
While the first option comes to mind right away, the second makes sense when we understand that there are others in the ME besides just Israel that do not want a nuclear Iran.
What are PH thinkers' takes on this?
http://www.taiwannews.com.tw/etn/news_content.php?...
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/another-...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43865727/ns/world_news...
Mossad1) It is the Israelis, CIA, MI-6, or assorted Western interests.
2) It is Saudia Arabia because there is an undercurrent battle between the Arab Saudis and the Persian Iranians for dominance in both the ME and the Islamic "world".
While the first option comes to mind right away, the second makes sense when we understand that there are others in the ME besides just Israel that do not want a nuclear Iran.
What are PH thinkers' takes on this?
http://www.taiwannews.com.tw/etn/news_content.php?...
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/another-...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43865727/ns/world_news...
Edited by Jimbeaux on Sunday 24th July 16:33
mattnunn said:
Jimbeaux said:
Iranian nuke scientists are killed in this manner over a few years: A motorcycle rides up in traffic and places a "sticky" bomb on the passenger window and rides off, the mini-bomb goes off killing only the scientist, 007 style. This is interesting. Two schools of thought:
1) It is the Israelis, CIA, MI-6, or assorted Western interests.
2) It is Saudia Arabia because there is an undercurrent battle between the Arab Saudis and the Persian Iranians for dominance in both the ME and the Islamic "world".
While the first option comes to mind right away, the second makes sense when we understand that there are others in the ME besides just Israel that do not want a nuclear Iran.
What are PH thinkers' takes on this?
Mossad 1) It is the Israelis, CIA, MI-6, or assorted Western interests.
2) It is Saudia Arabia because there is an undercurrent battle between the Arab Saudis and the Persian Iranians for dominance in both the ME and the Islamic "world".
While the first option comes to mind right away, the second makes sense when we understand that there are others in the ME besides just Israel that do not want a nuclear Iran.
What are PH thinkers' takes on this?
Jimbeaux said:
thinfourth2 said:
Well we can pretty rule out the yanks on this one
No crashed helicopters and only 2 people killed
We can rule out MI-6 as well too.....someone killed, no apologies issued, no council houses in Britain being readied for 50 of his closest relatives.No crashed helicopters and only 2 people killed
There has been a huge change in this country since cameron took office and what you say simply wouldn't happen
So i demand an apology
Only 45 of his closest relatives would get a free house now
thinfourth2 said:
Jimbeaux said:
thinfourth2 said:
Well we can pretty rule out the yanks on this one
No crashed helicopters and only 2 people killed
We can rule out MI-6 as well too.....someone killed, no apologies issued, no council houses in Britain being readied for 50 of his closest relatives.No crashed helicopters and only 2 people killed
There has been a huge change in this country since cameron took office and what you say simply wouldn't happen
So i demand an apology
Only 45 of his closest relatives would get a free house now
Jimbeaux said:
thinfourth2 said:
Well we can pretty rule out the yanks on this one
No crashed helicopters and only 2 people killed
We can rule out MI-6 as well too.....someone killed, no apologies issued, no council houses in Britain being readied for 50 of his closest relatives.No crashed helicopters and only 2 people killed
Jimbeaux said:
Countdown said:
Jimbeaux said:
Iranian nuke scientists are killed in this manner over a few years: A motorcycle rides up in traffic and places a "sticky" bomb on the passenger window and rides off, the mini-bomb goes off killing only the scientist, 007 style. This is interesting. Two schools of thought:
1) It is the Israelis, CIA, MI-6, or assorted Western interests.
2) It is Saudia Arabia because there is an undercurrent battle between the Arab Saudis and the Persian Iranians for dominance in both the ME and the Islamic "world".
While the first option comes to mind right away, the second makes sense when we understand that there are others in the ME besides just Israel that do not want a nuclear Iran.
I've read countless suggestions that it's the Israelis. As others have pointed out, they have a history of carrying out this type of killing. I've not read any suggestion anywhere that suggest the Saudis are behind this have ever done this kind of thing (until now).1) It is the Israelis, CIA, MI-6, or assorted Western interests.
2) It is Saudia Arabia because there is an undercurrent battle between the Arab Saudis and the Persian Iranians for dominance in both the ME and the Islamic "world".
While the first option comes to mind right away, the second makes sense when we understand that there are others in the ME besides just Israel that do not want a nuclear Iran.
Personaly, I lean more toward the Israeli option but see the Saudi one as interesting conversation at least.
Edited by Jimbeaux on Sunday 24th July 23:06
Blatantly Mossad.
The US wouldn't bother sending people in as it would cause a st storm if they were found out. Lets the Israelis deal with it and if they get caught who cares? It's just two Arab nations squabbling.
Feel sorry for the poor scientist bloke though. Car bomb assassination, what a way to go.
I generally dislike the Israelis and their treatment of the palestinians, I also think it's a joke that Israel is allowed to have nuclear weapons and Iran isn't.
Both countries are full of religious nutjobs but I'm pretty certain there's more in Israel than there is in Iran!
Let Iran get the nuke, they won't do st with it. It'll just be there as a deterrent from US influence.
Look at Pakistan. Full of terrorists, Osama bin laden was hiding there all along probably with the knowledge of the Pakistani armed forces/government.
What does the US do? fk all. A few drone strike, IIRC. But for the most part leaves Pakistan alone and even sends them a shed load of aid.
Having the bomb seems like a no brainer when it comes to protecting yourself from the US.
The US wouldn't bother sending people in as it would cause a st storm if they were found out. Lets the Israelis deal with it and if they get caught who cares? It's just two Arab nations squabbling.
Feel sorry for the poor scientist bloke though. Car bomb assassination, what a way to go.
I generally dislike the Israelis and their treatment of the palestinians, I also think it's a joke that Israel is allowed to have nuclear weapons and Iran isn't.
Both countries are full of religious nutjobs but I'm pretty certain there's more in Israel than there is in Iran!
Let Iran get the nuke, they won't do st with it. It'll just be there as a deterrent from US influence.
Look at Pakistan. Full of terrorists, Osama bin laden was hiding there all along probably with the knowledge of the Pakistani armed forces/government.
What does the US do? fk all. A few drone strike, IIRC. But for the most part leaves Pakistan alone and even sends them a shed load of aid.
Having the bomb seems like a no brainer when it comes to protecting yourself from the US.
Norfolkit said:
Jimbeaux said:
Countdown said:
Jimbeaux said:
Iranian nuke scientists are killed in this manner over a few years: A motorcycle rides up in traffic and places a "sticky" bomb on the passenger window and rides off, the mini-bomb goes off killing only the scientist, 007 style. This is interesting. Two schools of thought:
1) It is the Israelis, CIA, MI-6, or assorted Western interests.
2) It is Saudia Arabia because there is an undercurrent battle between the Arab Saudis and the Persian Iranians for dominance in both the ME and the Islamic "world".
While the first option comes to mind right away, the second makes sense when we understand that there are others in the ME besides just Israel that do not want a nuclear Iran.
I've read countless suggestions that it's the Israelis. As others have pointed out, they have a history of carrying out this type of killing. I've not read any suggestion anywhere that suggest the Saudis are behind this have ever done this kind of thing (until now).1) It is the Israelis, CIA, MI-6, or assorted Western interests.
2) It is Saudia Arabia because there is an undercurrent battle between the Arab Saudis and the Persian Iranians for dominance in both the ME and the Islamic "world".
While the first option comes to mind right away, the second makes sense when we understand that there are others in the ME besides just Israel that do not want a nuclear Iran.
Personaly, I lean more toward the Israeli option but see the Saudi one as interesting conversation at least.
Edited by Jimbeaux on Sunday 24th July 23:06
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff