Learner driver gets two years, does this seem harsh to you?

Learner driver gets two years, does this seem harsh to you?

Author
Discussion

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

206 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Somewhat harsh for the learner as the instructor who was incharge of her basically made a mistake.


As to introducing more rules and regualtions no thanks we have enough rules and regulations. I can't see why the thousands of parents who use common sense before teaching their kids to drive should be punished.

At very most i would suggest a leaflet sent out with all provisional licenses highlighting cases like this

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

248 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
It does seem very curious that we know nothing about the husband/instructor and any penalties which might have been imposed on him.

My limited understanding of driving instruction is that if the "learner" commits an offence then the "instructor" can (not will) be prosecuted for the same thing.

Most particularly in the case reported it seems bonkers that the first exploration of the car's controls was not conducted somewhere a lot more suitable.

elster

17,517 posts

212 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
It does seem very curious that we know nothing about the husband/instructor and any penalties which might have been imposed on him.

My limited understanding of driving instruction is that if the "learner" commits an offence then the "instructor" can (not will) be prosecuted for the same thing.

Most particularly in the case reported it seems bonkers that the first exploration of the car's controls was not conducted somewhere a lot more suitable.
I see this as entirely the fault of the instructor.

As much as the instructor was her husband he was still the licenced driver in the car and she was under instruction.



JagLover

42,794 posts

237 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Hooli said:
I also can't see why the husband didn't get an equal sentence.
Or indeed a longer sentence than her. What was he thinking taken someone out who had no driving experience whatsoever?

jonah35

3,940 posts

159 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I forgot that you can still get lessons by a non qualified instructor with dual controls.

seems weird doesn't it that you can apply for a provisional and then just get in a car with your husband sat next to you and go driving

i think your first 5/10 lessons should be by a BSM instructor with dual controls or the like

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

248 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
elster said:
I see this as entirely the fault of the instructor.
It is impossible for all of the fault to lie with someone who isn't even in the driving seat so clearly your approach can't fly.

We need to know what charges, if any, were pursued against the husband/instructor.

elster

17,517 posts

212 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
elster said:
I see this as entirely the fault of the instructor.
It is impossible for all of the fault to lie with someone who isn't even in the driving seat so clearly your approach can't fly.

We need to know what charges, if any, were pursued against the husband/instructor.
Why not? The person is driving under supervision. In other walks of life the supervisor is the one who is responsible for the actions of those under instruction. This should be the case. If the person can't instruct to a level that is safe. This is down to the person supervising, not the person under instruction.



thinfourth2

32,414 posts

206 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
jonah35 said:
i think your first 5/10 lessons should be by a BSM instructor with dual controls or the like
Why?

i live next to a farm

There is 14 year olds driving around 300Bhp tractors with more buttons and levers then the tardis

Once they are 16 they can drive around 24 tons of tractor and trailer on public roads

so once they reach 17 they have to sit next to a instructor in a dual control corsa before they should be allowed on the roads


Not everywhere is a city

anonymous-user

56 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
This is about personal responsibility, something that PH generally calls for. She could have refused to take the lesson in that car or could have insisted on being somewhere less risk prone. She sat in the driver's seat, took the controls and must accept responsibility for what occurred. If the judicial system cannot impose such punishments, to act as a lesson and deterrent, then legislation has to take over............

bicycleshorts

1,939 posts

163 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Why?

i live next to a farm

There is 14 year olds driving around 300Bhp tractors with more buttons and levers then the tardis

Once they are 16 they can drive around 24 tons of tractor and trailer on public roads

so once they reach 17 they have to sit next to a instructor in a dual control corsa before they should be allowed on the roads


Not everywhere is a city
In this case, they should take the bus. And if they want to get back home on the same day? Tough, sleep in the bus shelter until the bus comes back round!

Signed,
Fellow country bumpkin.

elster

17,517 posts

212 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
bicycleshorts said:
thinfourth2 said:
Why?

i live next to a farm

There is 14 year olds driving around 300Bhp tractors with more buttons and levers then the tardis

Once they are 16 they can drive around 24 tons of tractor and trailer on public roads

so once they reach 17 they have to sit next to a instructor in a dual control corsa before they should be allowed on the roads


Not everywhere is a city
In this case, they should take the bus. And if they want to get back home on the same day? Tough, sleep in the bus shelter until the bus comes back round!

Signed,
Fellow country bumpkin.
Not that much in the country.

Bus ha ha ha.

bicycleshorts

1,939 posts

163 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
elster said:
Not that much in the country.

Bus ha ha ha.
I must say, I was being optimistic as the bus is now cancelled!

Du1point8

21,620 posts

194 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I still can't work out how he was not able to stop it?

Put handbrake on and pull steering wheel to hit anything but a kid?

ANd I still think the first couple of lessons should be done in a dual control car... going round a car park does not prepare you for a car hurtling past you at 60mph in the opposite direction and panic can set in when that happens.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

206 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I love how the libertaerians on here scream for more laws for each and every problem that they encounter.

If she had run over a 18 year old chav you would't give a fook

Road traffic accidents kill 8 people a day in the UK but i don't hear anyone screaming for lower speed limits etc.

I don't see how punishing the thousands of folk that take to the road for the first time every year will solve the problem of someone not using common sense.

Stick a 16year old in field car and they will have got brakes and gears worked out in an hour

king arthur

6,654 posts

263 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Mobile Chicane said:
I take it all of you lot are Natural Born Drivers and have never experienced the blind panic when the learner's 'blue funk' comes down?

She panicked and lost it.

No chance for her instructor to gather it up in a single-control vehicle, and very sad that someone was killed as a result.
She didn't just panic and lose it though did she? According to the article she set off on her first ever lesson in a car without even knowing where the brake pedal was or what it was for. As a result, a child died. That level of crass stupidy needs to be punished.

GetCarter

29,443 posts

281 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
SpeedMattersNot said:
As said, it leads to an appreciation that at least the first few lessons need to be taken with a professional teacher/driving instructor.

The car is very much a weapon the law seems to not understand. For another example...why are people allowed to change their own wheel on a car, but arn't allowed to re-wire a plug in their own house? It's hillarious! We're not allowed to play with hot water from a gas boiler and rely on "professionals" to ensure our insurance is covered, but anyone can jack a car up and replace a brake caliper with pads and discs and track rod ends haha! Love it! As long as they're seriously harming other people and not just themselves, that is fine. Play ball hehe
Just to keep me in the loop... what legslation means I am not allowed to change a plug in my house? Just about to do so, and don't want to end up in prison.

TIA

Ganglandboss

8,324 posts

205 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
SpeedMattersNot said:
For another example...why are people allowed to change their own wheel on a car, but arn't allowed to re-wire a plug in their own house? It's hillarious!
Who told you that?

Finlandia

7,803 posts

233 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
Ganglandboss said:
SpeedMattersNot said:
For another example...why are people allowed to change their own wheel on a car, but arn't allowed to re-wire a plug in their own house? It's hillarious!
Who told you that?
Don't know about UK, but in Sweden this is actually the (hilarious) truth. All electric wiring must be done by a certified electrician, thus is the law.

7mike

3,025 posts

195 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
I love how the libertaerians on here scream for more laws for each and every problem that they encounter.
You could check out the DSA stats for injuries during tests; far more in non dual fitted vehicles. This is not a new issue (outside of PH)
thinfourth2 said:
If she had run over a 18 year old chav you would't give a fook
You may have a point there

thinfourth2 said:
Road traffic accidents kill 8 people a day in the UK but i don't hear anyone screaming for lower speed limits etc.
Going on 2010 stats it's 5 a day, but judging by early info on 2011 it looks like it's on the up again so don't worry, there'll be plenty out there screaming for lower speed limits soon

thinfourth2 said:
I don't see how punishing the thousands of folk that take to the road for the first time every year will solve the problem of someone not using common sense.
By punishing, I take it you mean having to pay for driving lessons. If they can't afford them they sure as fook can't afford the first year's insurance premium.

thinfourth2 said:
Stick a 16year old in field car and they will have got brakes and gears worked out in an hour
If there are enough understanding farmers around then I'm all for it.

anonymous-user

56 months

Thursday 22nd December 2011
quotequote all
I've taught 2 people to drive now, both to a far higher standard than average.

what can possibly be gained by preventing me teaching more? those calling for mandatory hours with a "qualified" instructor need to get a grip.

the numpty whining about changing their own brakes needs to go forth too - my work is a higher standard than most garages as thered no profit motivated time pressure.

more law isn't the answer: lawyers are scum. an iq test before provisional license would be far better. the bottom 25% ARE too stupid to drive.