'Mythical' swan photo taken down after 'bestiality' fears

'Mythical' swan photo taken down after 'bestiality' fears

Author
Discussion

Zaxxon

4,057 posts

162 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
If your a fricken big Greek god that can turn yourself into a swan, I think you could make yourself have a huge cock to go with it?

Greek mythology is way more fun than modern religion.

Talking snakes and burning bushes? fk of, have a Rapist Swan, a flying horse and a bird with snakes for hair!

Pothole

34,367 posts

284 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Surely she was risking a broken arm, being that close to a swan wasn't she?

PoleDriver

28,665 posts

196 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
It can't be that bad! I've heard that even the Queen is into swan upping!

getmecoat

Puggit

48,531 posts

250 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Zaxxon said:
If your a fricken big Greek god that can turn yourself into a swan, I think you could make yourself have a huge cock to go with it?

Greek mythology is way more fun than modern religion.

Talking snakes and burning bushes? fk of, have a Rapist Swan, a flying horse and a bird with snakes for hair!
rofl

otolith

56,542 posts

206 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Gnits said:
2. Given also that birds have no equipment to insert merely a vent
!
Almost all birds - but not ostriches, ducks, geese, swans or flamingos:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/16112188


fluffnik

20,156 posts

229 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
el stovey said:
So in summary

Swan on top of woman OK.
Golden Retriever on top of woman not OK.
...censorship far, far worse.

There's very little anywhere close to being as obscene as pandering to prurient prudery.

fluffnik

20,156 posts

229 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Greg_D said:
All i have left to say on this topic is that people have started amending their posts to reflect the perceived NSFW nature of the piece!
Says just as much about authoritarianism in the workplace...

Gwagon111

4,422 posts

163 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
They had better hope the guy never sees 'Pan and the she goat'. His head will explode.

hornet

6,333 posts

252 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Munter said:
I think the difference here is that the painting is possible without the event. A photo (assuming not shopped), is actually an event. She really did strike that pose, and there really was some form of "swan" between her legs.
I was under the impression that drawings now fall foul of the recent extreme pornography rules every bit as much as actual pictures, stuffed swans notwithstanding?

fluffnik

20,156 posts

229 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
hornet said:
I was under the impression that drawings now fall foul of the recent extreme pornography rules every bit as much as actual pictures, stuffed swans notwithstanding?
Yup.

Yet another fascist thoughtcrime law. rage

JonRB

Original Poster:

74,891 posts

274 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
hornet said:
I was under the impression that drawings now fall foul of the recent extreme pornography rules every bit as much as actual pictures, stuffed swans notwithstanding?
You're correct - drawings, cartoons and CGI renderings.


MK4 Slowride

10,028 posts

210 months

Tuesday 1st May 2012
quotequote all
Slyjoe said:
Do swans even have cocks?
Would it be a Swan Schlong?
hehe